Since when did Tibet became a nation before China? Your weak arguments and claims has no legitimacy in history. You are now copying by words and perspectives because you have NOTHING left to prove that Tibet should be separated from China. "You know nothing Jon Snow." No matter how much you hate the CPC or the PRC at this state you and your disgusting kind WILL NEVER tear us apart. You can try die by fighting us and we will still be here. There are more of us than you.
Me and my disgusting kind, eh? Winter is coming for you if you continue along this path, I have no doubt. In any case, your nearly total ignorance of history is not a reason for you to have a tempest in a teacup. The entire internet is at your fingertips and yet you are obviously too goddamn lazy to fact-check Tibetan history for yourself, and instead have decided to double down on your hilariously ignorant nerdraging temper tantrum. Here, let me help you, because it sounds like you're probably too shaken with nerdrage to think straight right now:
You will find sources noting the establishment of the Tibetan Empire by the 7th century (starting with the reign of Namri Songtsen), with externally verifiable sources (e.g. Chinese). Please note that the Yuan dynasty started during the 13th century. The Tibetans even managed to sack Chang'an (X'ian) in 763AD during the reign of Trisong Detsen, which at the time was the capital city of the Tang. Peace was not declared between the Tibetan Empire and the Tang dynasty until 821AD. The next time you try to make one of your hilariously and massively ignorant 'historical' claims, do try to fact-check it first before you make yourself look like an even bigger fool.
Hmmm...just like those Tibetan serfs who suppose to take it up the arse from the Dalai Lama and his group of stooges? Many of them suffered because of that oppressive brain washing cult that killed them. So how come you conveniently erase that part of history for your weak arguments? Oh yeah...because you know nothing.
Sure, sure. It must have been only the close clique of the Dalai Lama that threw off the shackles of the Yuan and then the Qing and was responsible for all the uprisings since 1950. It was all Dalai according to your genius self. None of the Tibetan commoners had any desire to not be under the thumb of a foreign power. If you really think that, then why don't we find out EXACTLY how many Tibetans would prefer the evil oppressive Dalai Lama to the wondrous CCP. Or are you still too afraid to find out?
Bottom line is this: Tibet is NOT conquered land. North America, South America, and Australia and New Zealand are conquered land. You just simply don't want Tibetans to be a part of the PRC. Tibet and Tibetans history are being recorded and study far more aggressively than in any Western academia or even by Tibetan themselves. The Chinese Ministry of culture, history, sociology, anthropology, architecture, linguist, music, and language. As a result, this retains and sustain the culture of the Tibetans. Meanwhile Westerners are trying to spread their religious institutional beliefs through out the world and you are not concern about that? That tells me that your priority is messed up. That means you are just trolling to get China to be separated into many parts therefore weaker and submittal to your favorite whatever religious cult that you belong to.
Tibet is conquered land. It was conquered by the Mongols, then the Manchurians, then the PLA. This is a fact of history that (thankfully) does not depend on nerdraging ultranationalists' opinions. I don't have a firm stance on whether Tibet should be a part of the PRC; I have said this before but you were not listening due to your brainwashed indoctrination.
