I think everyone is over thinking this a little.
Despite turkey being a NATO member, ankara has been moving away from NATO politically of late, and it is a stretch to believe the US would exert such control over what is through and through, another nation's affairs. Nor is it the first time a US ally has bought non US/NATO equipment.
We might think its groud breaking that a Chinese SAM managed to beat out international peers in a competition, but in the scheme of things it is just another day at the office for the other vendors.
We should take a moment to ponder if the FD-2000 sale may lead HQ-9 to be compromised if US sought to strongarm a "look" at turkey's eventual systems, but this is an export version, likely with relevant modifications and safeguards in place to mitigate what an enemy may be able to serve to use against the domestic HQ-9, and there are other ways to control sensitive components, such as stationing a permanent liaison or technician to "watch over" the systems and make sure the Turks don't let ill motives parties get their hands on it.
It is a ground breaking win, because China has never won anything close to this large outside its own turf of Asian and African countries. This might turn out to be even larger export deal than JF-17 project (really depends on how many PAF purchases). China is certainly not at the level of those other vendors (Especially Lockmart and Rosoboronexport)
It will be an export version of HQ-9 (called FD-2000) so chances are any sensitive hardware and software would be substantially modified or downgraded from the domestic version. No way they would've sold the mainstay of their IADS without considering all the juicy intelligence US could siphon from it.
and 3 billion (actually 3 billion - costs) would probably be peanuts compared to whatever PLA is allocating to fund the HQ-9 successor.
It has -- on quite a few defence media sites. Don't expect mainstream media to give this deal much exposure, it's not that news worthy for your average joe.
Well, we don't quite know if HQ-9 actually has a slant range that high, despite what sinodefence.com says. I remember a brochure years ago saying it was more like 120km, which is still competitive with the other offerings, mind. And the presence of an AESA acquisition radar isn't exactly unique to HQ-9, all the others had high performance phased array radars as well, probably with comparable anti LO performance.
No, I think what won china this deal (apart from competitive performance), was its low price, terms such as co production and tech transfer, turkey's movements towards a more independent foreign policy outside of NATO, and possible under the table doodads that may include "unrelated" economic deals, probably in about that order of importance.
I agree with most of this. I think the brochure said 125 km, which is already an improvement over 90 km of FT-2000. But the actual engagement envelope of the system they export is classified. And I would think if they are transferring technology and working with Turkish on this one, the system will end up with better specs than what's advertised on the trade shows. Especially since all of the advancements thtat they continue to make in long range SAM.
The other thing to think of is that Russians were offering similar advantages like lower price (although not as low), co-production, tech transfers and independence of NATO and HQ-9 beat S-300PMU2. That to me is a huge deal, because PMU2 is a really great system.