China to recieve an Export Waiver for the C-130

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Actually (this is my own opinion though and not base on any credible sources), China would buy, even if it is only one C-130.

Reason? It would be a slight gesture of closing a bit of the gap between the trade deficit that the US had been talking about. Well... China has the money, they can easily buy a few of these white elephants and stored them somewhere in their backyard.

Plus with the successful sales of this piece of equipment, it will open the door for future export from other sources like the EU. US couldn't say much then, as they themselves had sold military hardware (even in the guise of using it for civilian purposes), to China. There really is no other restriction for the EU to start selling their hardware too.

That said, this is a win-win situation for China, US and perhaps EU too.

@Zoom,

As to landing and taking off of transport plane the size of C-130 from the Varyag is something that I have not heard of. It is not just the runway that made up the whole thing. Where are you going to store your C-130? Carrier are quite space constraint (I think Popeye would know more in this topic).

Not saying that it can't be done, but it is not usual practice. And I doubt it would make Y-9 obsolete... afterall there is only 5 C-130 in this sales.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Well... China has the money, they can easily buy a few of these white elephants and stored them somewhere in their backyard.

White elephants? By no means is a C-130 a white elephant.

The Lockeed has no problem selling them. I don't think a J model would be sold to China but I would not be surprised.

The Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules is the world's most advanced tactical airlifter. Designed and developed with mission flexibility in mind combat delivery, air-to-air refueling, special operations, disaster relief and humanitarian missions the C-130J has a unique mix of agility and performance to consistently operate at very high tempo operations efficiently and reliably.
The C-130J Super Hercules is the only airlifter with the range and flexibility for emerging theaters and evolving concepts of operation. This tactical transport aircraft has already proven itself in many kinds of missions, many in the harshest operating conditions possible.
Crews from the United States, Australia, Denmark, Italy and the United Kingdom are now experiencing the high reliability, range, speed and payload-carrying capabilities of the C-130J firsthand. They will be joined soon by crews from Norway, Canada, and India.
c130j_flags.gif
As for a C-130 on a carrier,,C-130s were tested on the USS Forrestal in 1963..here's a video..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
More on the C-130 on the FID..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


When one reviews the encyclopedic range of accomplishments by the C-130 Hercules and its valiant aircrews over the years, surely one of the most astounding took place in October 1963 when the U.S. Navy decided to try to land a Hercules on an aircraft carrier. Was it possible? Who would believe that the big, four-engine C-130 with its bulky fuselage and 132-foot wing span could land on the deck of a carrier?

Not only was it possible, it was done in moderately rough seas 500 miles out in the North Atlantic off the coast of Boston. In so doing, the airplane became the largest and heaviest aircraft to ever land on an aircraft carrier, a record that stands to this day.

When Lt. James H. Flatley III was told about his new assignment, he thought somebody was pulling his leg. "Operate a C-130 off an aircraft carrier? Somebody's got to be kidding," he said. But they weren't kidding. In fact, the Chief of Naval Operations himself had ordered a feasibility study on operating the big propjet aboard the Norfolk-based U.S.S. Forrestal (CVA-59). The Navy was trying to find out whether they could use the Hercules as a "Super COD" - a "Carrier Onboard Delivery" aircraft. The airplane then used for such tasks was the Grumman C-1 Trader, a twin piston-engine bird with a limited payload capacity and 300-mile range. If an aircraft carrier is operating in mid-ocean, it has no "onboard delivery" system to fall back on and must come nearer land before taking aboard even urgently needed items. The Hercules was stable and reliable, with a long cruising range and capable of carrying large payloads

The aircraft, a KC-130F refueler transport (BuNo 149798), on loan from the U.S. Marines, was delivered on 8 October. Lockheed's only modifications to the original plane included installing a smaller nose-landing gear orifice, an improved anti-skid braking system, and removal of the underwing refueling pods. "The big worry was whether we could meet the maximum sink rate of nine feet per second," Flatley said. As it turned out, the Navy was amazed to find they were able to better this mark by a substantial margin.

In addition to Flatley, the crew consisted of Lt.Cmdr. W.W. Stovall, copilot; ADR-1 E.F. Brennan, flight engineer; and Lockheed engineering flight test pilot Ted H. Limmer, Jr. The initial sea-born landings on 30 October 1963 were made into a 40-knot wind. Altogether, the crew successfully negotiated 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unarrested full-stop landings, and 21 unassisted takeoffs at gross weights of 85,000 pounds up to 121,000 pounds. At 85,000 pounds, the KC-130F came to a complete stop within 267 feet, about twice the aircraft's wing span! The Navy was delighted to discover that even with a maximum payload, the plane used only 745 feet for takeoff and 460 feet for landing roll. The short landing roll resulted from close coordination between Flatley and Jerry Daugherty, the carrier's landing signal officer. Daugherty, later to become a captain and assigned to the Naval Air Systems Command, gave Flatley an engine "chop" while still three or four feet off the deck.

Lockheed's Ted Limmer, who checked out fighter pilot Flatley in the C-130, stayed on for some of the initial touch-and-go and full-stop landings. "The last landing I participated in, we touched down about 150 feet from the end, stopped in 270 feet more and launched from that position, using what was left of the deck. We still had a couple hundred feet left when we lifted off. Admiral Brown was flabbergasted."

The plane's wingspan cleared the Forrestal's flight deck "island" control tower by just under 15 feet as the plane roared down the deck on a specially painted line. Lockheed's chief engineer, Art E. Flock was aboard to observe the testing. "The sea was pretty big that day. I was up on the captain's bridge. I watched a man on the ship's bow as that bow must have gone up and down 30 feet." The speed of the shop was increased 10 knots to reduce yaw motion and to reduce wind direction. Thus, when the plane landed, it had a 40 to 50 knot wind on the nose. "That airplane stopped right opposite the captain's bridge," recalled Flock. "There was cheering and laughing. There on the side of the fuselage, a big sign had been painted on that said, "LOOK MA, NO HOOK."

From the accumulated test data, the Navy concluded that with the C-130 Hercules, it would be possible to lift 25,000 pounds of cargo 2,500 miles and land it on a carrier. Even so, the idea was considered a bit too risky for the C-130 and the Navy elected to use a smaller COD aircraft. For his effort, the Navy awarded Flatley the Distinguished Flying Cross.

Excerpts from Herk: Hero of the Skies, by Joseph Earl Dabney, Airlines Publications and Sales, Ltd., 1979.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
White elephants? By no means is a C-130 a white elephant.

The Lockeed has no problem selling them. I don't think a J model would be sold to China but I would not be surprised.


As for a C-130 on a carrier,,C-130s were tested on the USS Forrestal in 1963..here's a video..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I think he meant that the C-130's won't be able to be properly used in the military because of the (eventual) lack of spare parts and maintenance. Even the most durable aircraft is useless if you don't give it the proper support and that's what happened with China's handful of blackhawks over the years.

And I think zoom was joking about putting a C-130 on teh varyag... I doubt the ski jump could handle a hercules, or vice versa...

China really should buy a few C-130's, just to open up possible future arms sales, but use it exclusively for the oil spills/civilian tasks -- they have to be very careful not to get lured into buying too many Hercules or the Y-9 may be eclipsed.I believe the latter has a very good potential of being China's own "super hercules," and could have good long term prospects as a variety of platforms and possible foreign sales.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Thanks for that clarification..but. China could get parts for a C-130 from many different countries. Pakistan comes to mind. It would be possible to have a C-130 on a CV..of course with no ski ramp.,,but it's not going to happen!
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Thanks for that clarification..but. China could get parts for a C-130 from many different countries. Pakistan comes to mind. It would be possible to have a C-130 on a CV..of course with no ski ramp.,,but it's not going to happen!

I don't think China would be able to get any spare parts if the US decided that they are not going to sell. Of course many countries might have the capability to develope and manufacture spare parts for this type of aircraft, I don't think they would want to sell these spares to China, unless they are prepared to go out against the US.

Plus, although Russia or any other nations or organization might not be producing a C-130 in term of tech (actually I doubt this), they are able to sell alternatives that are more or less in the same league as the C-130.

When I say C-130 as white elephants, I actually means, China does not really need this type of aircrafts, not that C-130 is not good or anything (I believe Singapore also operate a few). The main thing here is C-130 that was going to be sold to China is only limited to 5 plane and with no technology transfer or license to build further units. To China these five planes will be white elephants.

But China sometime needed white elephants so as to open out the door for other benefits.

Think of it this way, I have only a sole vendor selling me military hardware which I might not be able to build yet. This vendor is monopolising the market and he could charge or delay delivery as and when he deemed fit. But if I have another vendor that could do the same. I might be able to push down the price per unit.

That say, at present moment, China could either rely on Russia for their transport aircraft or build their own transport.

Buying from Russia is no doubt a cheap alternative and manufacturing one or designing one take time (which China is doing at present moment). However they might need transport urgently for their civilian or military usage. And Russia might know this, so they might charge per unit price higher than it usually was or given a leadtime that was not acceptable.

Now, US offered to sell their C-130 (5 units), might be very expensive, but this would open door for EU to start their own business with China. So effectively China would have two more vendors in the pictures willing to sell transport or other hardware.

Well... even if US is offering to sell only 5 units of C-130 at present moment, I believe with negotiation, US might even open out for more purchases, also as a way of decreasing the trade deficit between China and US (whereby US had claimed China of having an unfair trade terms whereby the goods sold to US is much cheaper than if it was manufactured in US itself.)

And Russia upon seeing that they really have quite a bit of competition here and it was no longer a monopoly... they would think twice about rising per unit cost or leadtime, and even draft out better deals that would benefit China and herself too.

Well... it is all about business here. And not tech quality and stuff like that.

As I have mentioned before... it is not always about buying something of the best quality or correct choice... instead it is always buying something that is politically correct.
 

Quickie

Colonel
I think some of the comments were already envisioning a situation if the U.S. were to decide to hold back the parts for some reason. The supplying of parts should already be part of the buying agreement. If nothing major happens along the way, China should be able to operate the 5 planes just as normally as other countries currently operating the plane.
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
I think some of the comments were already envisioning a situation if the U.S. were to decide to hold back the parts for some reason. The supplying of parts should already be part of the buying agreement. If nothing major happens along the way, China should be able to operate the 5 planes just as normally as other countries currently operating the plane.

remember the time when China operate Black Hawks? Well... I believe it is in the contract that US should sell spare parts to China for maintanence of the aircraft... But when things strained between China and US... the spare parts also stop coming in.

This might exactly be the same thing with the C-130... in actual fact, I believe that is also why whenever China buy hardware from another nation, they wanted technology transfer and better still licence production of that hardware. So when something happen, China can still maintain and even have the capability to build these hardware by herself.
 

Red Moon

Junior Member
The thing is that this plane is intended for oil spill cleanup. Refusing to provide spare parts would be just stupid. The US would be blamed for contributing to environmental problems, on top of losing business for no reason at all.

However, I noticed that China.org.cn had an article on this asserting that the US may lift arms embargo. It does sound stretched, but on the other hand, I have noticed a definite change in tone in US-China relations in the last couple of days.
 

zoom

Junior Member
The thing is that this plane is intended for oil spill cleanup. Refusing to provide spare parts would be just stupid. The US would be blamed for contributing to environmental problems, on top of losing business for no reason at all.
They refused to send spares for the black hawks initially despite getting reassurances they would be strictly used for disaster relief.Political tools will be used no matter what logic dictates.If China buys these ,they need to ensure they can operate them independent of US or anyone else.
 
Top