@ bd popeye
According to "Afghanistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance" the US spent about $14b from 2002 up to and including 2010 on economic assistance to Afghanistan. A large part of that money was spent in ways most Afghans will have considered waste:
corruption, sending legal personnel and professors to the US, trying to improve the position of women, subsidizing NGO's.
Then is there payment to alleviate the destruction due to war. Does all that compensate for that destruction and what about the destruction due to the poppies eradication program that, strangely, is also part of the US assistance? The work of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams is, according to your previous post, largely wasted. So what part of the $14b can be honestly counted as real assistance and is experienced as such by the Afghans?
According to "Afghanistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance" the US spent about $14b from 2002 up to and including 2010 on economic assistance to Afghanistan. A large part of that money was spent in ways most Afghans will have considered waste:
corruption, sending legal personnel and professors to the US, trying to improve the position of women, subsidizing NGO's.
Then is there payment to alleviate the destruction due to war. Does all that compensate for that destruction and what about the destruction due to the poppies eradication program that, strangely, is also part of the US assistance? The work of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams is, according to your previous post, largely wasted. So what part of the $14b can be honestly counted as real assistance and is experienced as such by the Afghans?