China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Becoming upset when challenged.
I don't know where you could have read that. Another one of your English problems, no doubt.
Like i was saying.
No, haha, I said it's competitive and you thought it was absolute, as in everyone rising together. "Like you were saying" everything wrong.
Nobody will deny that. It is you and PRC gov who think US becoming weak just because CHina is rising.
Comparatively. Is this another word that you don't understand?
Thanks for admiting that having tech independance does not mean US losing.
Unfortunately, you gave premature gratitude like applicants thanking the interviewer for their consideration when they were not really considered at all. Losing... sales? That's quite a small picture you've burrowed yourself into. Even sales will eventually start to decline when it's glaringly obvious that your tech is inferior like in 5G. I'm talking about losing dominant position, big picture.
This is where having alliance is primordial. Where are the China allies?
It's not primordial; it is everyone seeking safety by cowering to the leading power. Only strength is primordial. China's has alliances, especially with Russia, the most powerful ally in the world other than China and the US. But until Chinese power overtakes that of America's it will lack "allies" in comparison. Fear of the American whip is the main obstacle.
And like member Totoro said :
"The single biggest strategic vulnerability china has is relative lack of allies and potentially small world market acess if it cant intice enough countries to be neutral and contimie trading freely with it. Evertying else, the weapons, geography, oil etc is secondary. "
This may be China's biggest strategic vulnerability because internally, China has everything well under control. Even though it is the biggest, it does not mean that it is a fatal vulnerability. You cannot entice someone to be neutral when they are afraid of American hard power. We have seen just that. So, putting the horse before the cart again, would mean that China needs to supplant American power before it gains these allies.
Tech independance is also secondary.
No, tech is first. You can conquer the world on your own power if your tech is good enough.
But PRC said they don't do alliance thing.
LOLOL WHAT? When the PRC say they "don't do alliance thing?" LOL
That is why they threaten everybody for everything and anything. Either they don't really want to compete with US or they are incompetent in IR.
They give loans and loan forgiveness all the time to small countries. But really, when comprehensive power is still below the US, it's about as good as it gets; you can't make a country want to fight against America for your own good. Your reading comprehension and understanding are the only things that are incompetent, and thoroughly so.
 
Last edited:

escobar

Brigadier
No, haha, I said it's competitive and you thought it was absolute, as in everyone rising together. "Like you were saying" everything wrong.
Comparatively. Is this another word that you don't understand?

Term theatrical dance? OK

Unfortunately, you gave premature gratitude like applicants thanking the interviewer for their consideration when they were not really considered at all. Losing... sales? That's quite a small picture you've burrowed yourself into. Even sales will eventually start to decline when it's glaringly obvious that your tech is inferior like in 5G. I'm talking about losing dominant position, big picture.

Lol, the issue was if China having tech independance mean US losing. I refute that and now you are in theatrical thing.

It's not primordial; it is everyone seeking safety by cowering to the leading power. Only strength is primordial.

And strenght also come from alliance. US primary draw its power from alliance.

China's has alliances, especially with Russia, the most powerful ally in the world other than China and the US.
And you just admit that at least there is a powerful Country like Russia not against CHina. You just admit that alliance matters.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Term theatrical dance? OK
I don't know what further words you don't understand. It's up to you to not use them like you always do.

Lol, the issue was if China having tech independance mean US losing. I refute that and now you are in theatrical thing.
You failed to refute it and I don't know what theatrical thing means. You mean you didn't understand the word "dance" so now you replace it with "thing"? LOL You are really taking a huge swing several levels higher than your debate/English skills permit.

And strenght also come from alliance. US primary draw its power from alliance.
Yes, that's true. It didn't always rely on foreign power but the US is realizing that one-vs-one it's going to lose against China so it's digging deep in its bag of henchmen grunts to see what it can come up with. Quite desperate, and still unable to stop China from closing in on it.

And you just admit that at least there is a powerful Country like Russia not against CHina. You just admit that alliance matters.
Yes, I "admit" that Russia is not against China and I "admit" that alliance is not inconsequential. You've lost all of your points to me so now you're inventing things for me to "admit" which I have never denied before? LOL
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Well US is doing the ‘salami slicing’ tactic using PRC playbook. US is testing China redline.
PRC gov not prepared for this "war'. It seems PRC gov don't know what to do exactly.
The instigator is trying to provoke a reaction. If you do not react, you will drive the instigator mad thereby exposing its real intention. Then you can make the appropriate action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top