Then why did he delete the post within seconds ?
And didn't you also claim it was just a rocket launch and I am the one who doesn't know how notam work lol
China ICBM/SLBM, nuclear arms thread
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
And didn't you also claim it was just a rocket launch and I am the one who doesn't know how notam work lol
Using NOTAMs to predict a PLARF missile launch is the most common approach—what’s so new about that? The reason I thought it was a rocket launch is that this trajectory differs from previous PLARF trajectories, and there’s a maritime rocket launch site nearby; I didn’t consider the possibility of an SLBM.
It’s quite normal for OSINT to make errors in judgment, but that’s entirely different from the BS of claiming NOTAM information is top-secret!
antiterror13
Brigadier
what are youtrying to say? this is a serious and semi-professional discussion
antiterror13
Brigadier
NZ and Australia had been briefed by China on the upcoming test.
Where did you get thge info that Japan was briefed 30 mins after the launch?
No, they notified Japan before the launch—specifically at 11:30 local time in Japan (10:30 Beijing time)—and Japan also mentioned the NOTAM issued on July 5, indicating that they had already anticipated it before the official notification.
Nvm then. I saw it on X.
Anyway question, do China retrieve the remains after test? Or do they just leave it there in the ocean? Will it risk other countries to try and retrieve for study/reverse engineer
Yes Liao Wang 1 is there for exactly this reason.
Which also means LW1 has been commissioned now.
It was a dummy warhead—probably just a counterweight—so letting it sink to a depth of 4 to 5km in the South Pacific wouldn’t pose any risk.
Now that we've seen the test launches of the DF-31AG (by the PLARF) in 2024 and the JL-2 (by the PLAN) in 2026. Let's see when the PLAAF will test launch its JL-1, which would complete the demonstration of China's nuclear triad.
Last edited: