China Flanker Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.

SinoSoldier

Colonel
I was under the impression that although both F-15SK and F-15SG were based upon the F-15E airframe, they were designed with airsuperiority in mind since they are the mainstay fighters for their respective nations. Other aircraft that entered the South Korean competition were the Su-35 and Eurofighter Typhoon. I think this is indicative of what South Korea was looking for.

They are designed with the secondary option of engaging in air to air combat. This simply means that they are able to fire guided air to air missiles and have some form of airborne radar.
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
They are designed with the secondary option of engaging in air to air combat. This simply means that they are able to fire guided air to air missiles and have some form of airborne radar.

Well , F-15 was originally designed with "Not a pound for air-to-ground" philosophy . F-15E was developed from two-seater F-15B so aircraft retains a lot of its air-to-air capability . Kinetically , F-15s are behind Su-27 family and even Americans admit that :

The US Air Force claims the F-15C is in several respects inferior to, or at best equal to, the MiG-29, Su-27, Su-35/37, Rafale, and EF-2000, which are variously superior in acceleration, maneuverability, engine thrust, rate of climb, avionics, firepower, radar signature, or range. Although the F-15C and Su-27P series are similar in many categories, the Su-27 can outperform the F-15C at both long and short ranges. In long-range encounters, with its superiorr radar the Su-27 can launch a missile before the F-15C does, so from a purely kinematic standpoint, the Russian fighters outperform the F-15C in the beyond-visual-range fight.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Still , these are very capable fighters and should not be underestimated in air-to-air combat .
 

hardware

Banned Idiot
 近日,美国媒体日前发表文章称,中国航母缺乏战斗群防卫能力,舰载机编队和防护舰队严重不足,这使其在面临美军时将身陷险境。中国航母没有专用的电子战飞机是一大“硬伤”,军事专家尹卓在接受北京电视台《军情解码》采访时表示,歼15改装成电子战飞机.
在谈到美国媒体质疑中国航母没有配备电子战飞机,我们有什么应对措施时,尹卓表示,电子战飞机的缺失,这是比较容易弥补的。因为航母上专用的电子战飞机,它是舰载机的同型机改装。我军的歼15舰载机,功率非常大,其电子战能力应该是很强的,给歼15配上电子干扰吊舱,或者配上其他电子侦察装备外加电子干扰手段,都是没有问题的。也就是,我们现在的平台已经有了,而且是重型平台,比F-35改成电子战飞机要强得多。(黄子娟)
J based radio interview,some J-15 will convert into EW aircraft similiar to EA-18G.
(error on blogger ,confuse unable to tell the different between EA-18G and F-35)
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Well , F-15 was originally designed with "Not a pound for air-to-ground" philosophy . F-15E was developed from two-seater F-15B so aircraft retains a lot of its air-to-air capability . Kinetically , F-15s are behind Su-27 family and even Americans admit that :

The US Air Force claims the F-15C is in several respects inferior to, or at best equal to, the MiG-29, Su-27, Su-35/37, Rafale, and EF-2000, which are variously superior in acceleration, maneuverability, engine thrust, rate of climb, avionics, firepower, radar signature, or range. Although the F-15C and Su-27P series are similar in many categories, the Su-27 can outperform the F-15C at both long and short ranges. In long-range encounters, with its superiorr radar the Su-27 can launch a missile before the F-15C does, so from a purely kinematic standpoint, the Russian fighters outperform the F-15C in the beyond-visual-range fight.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Still , these are very capable fighters and should not be underestimated in air-to-air combat .

Let's not forget that all the countries which use F-15s (US, Israel, Japan Singapore, Saudi Arabia) also have very mature and robust C4ISR and air defense systems which exponentially increases the ability of the Eagle.

Also outside of the USAF, these F-15s are used primarily for defensive purposes as well. Israel is the exception (defensive + offensive) however the distances that IAF Eagles fly is usually well within reach of it's C4ISR and Israeli air defence umbrella. It will be extremely rare if ever to see F-15s flying and relying strictly just on themselves in any sort of operations.
Comparing the abilities of the F-15 strictly on it's own merit makes for interesting and fun academic discussion however in real world operations that is really not that important. In the real world F-15s will be part of a force multiplier operations.

The countries that fly F-15s also have other make as well and any operation will be a combo of these aircraft types also eithe rin hi-hi, hi-lo mix etc to maximize effectiveness.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
The US Air Force claims the F-15C is in several respects inferior to, or at best equal to, the MiG-29, Su-27, Su-35/37, Rafale, and EF-2000, which are variously superior in acceleration, maneuverability, engine thrust, rate of climb, avionics, firepower, radar signature, or range. Although the F-15C and Su-27P series are similar in many categories, the Su-27 can outperform the F-15C at both long and short ranges. In long-range encounters, with its superiorr radar the Su-27 can launch a missile before the F-15C does, so from a purely kinematic standpoint, the Russian fighters outperform the F-15C in the beyond-visual-range fight. [/I]

Raptor funding.

Enough said.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
¦^��: China Flanker Thread II

From Huitong:

There has been a rumor that a further improved version (J-11C/J-18?) optimized for air-superiority is being developed but this has not been confirmed.
 

hardware

Banned Idiot
 战斗机制造业往往集成了一个国家在材料、动力和设计等领域的尖端技术。打造新式战机固然能带动相关领域实力的提升,但循序渐进地改进现役战机同样可积累宝贵经验。根据超大获得的相关消息证实,中国生产的双发重型战斗机歼-11系列,即将迎来最新的一个改进型号:歼-11D,关于“歼-11D”的具体消息目前尚未明确,但据推测应该是一款隐身化的双发单座战斗机,计划在2014年实现首飞。
J-11D to make her test flight in 2014.according to the blogger is a twin seat, stealth version of J-11.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
 战斗机制造业往往集成了一个国家在材料、动力和设计等领域的尖端技术。打造新式战机固然能带动相关领域实力的提升,但循序渐进地改进现役战机同样可积累宝贵经验。根据超大获得的相关消息证实,中国生产的双发重型战斗机歼-11系列,即将迎来最新的一个改进型号:歼-11D,关于“歼-11D”的具体消息目前尚未明确,但据推测应该是一款隐身化的双发单座战斗机,计划在2014年实现首飞。
J-11D to make her test flight in 2014.according to the blogger is a twin seat, stealth version of J-11.

Flying with Russian engines...?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top