Two Chinese ballistic firing tests scheduled for November 19 in the yellow zone..
Ramping up China nuclear scary stories to force China into nuclear arms deal?China has fielded new, longer-range ballistic missiles on its six nuclear-powered submarines, allowing it to hit the continental US from much closer to its own shores, the US acknowledged publicly for the first time Friday.
No, China can't be forced into any deal and certainly won't be pressured by Bloomberg articles. They're just reporting facts incompetently - the new missile is the JL-2A, not JL-3.
Ramping up China nuclear scary stories to force China into nuclear arms deal?
"for the first time Friday"
Ramping up China nuclear scary stories to force China into nuclear arms deal?
And why you think it is likely JL-2A? "We keep close track of those submarines" the Adm says. He should know what is inside the launch tubesAnyway, still seems likely it's just the JL-2A, not the actual JL-3? (Analogous to DF-31 -> 31A, cpl thousand km range extension but not 41). Another Admiral parroting it probably doesn't mean much.
Why would he? He visited one of the subs?And why you think it is likely JL-2A? "We keep close track of those submarines" the Adm says. He should know what is inside the launch tubes
He has same source as @clockwork: Sinodefence ForumWhy would he? He visited one of the subs?
I read through the article. Doesn't seem like there is any contradiction in there. This is what the admiral said. Do you expect them to report it differently?"for the first time Friday"
>It would allow China to target the continental US “from a protected bastion within the South China Sea,” US Strategic Command Commander Admiral Charles Richard told the Senate Armed Services Committee back in March.
...refuting their own title in the article...
What's up with western media writing on nuke stuff always being so amateurish and cringe? Whether WSJ, NYT, FT, etc.
Anyway, still seems likely it's just the JL-2A, not the actual JL-3? (Analogous to DF-31 -> 31A, cpl thousand km range extension but not 41). Another Admiral parroting it probably doesn't mean much.
I think they get the designation wrong, this very "JL-3" is probably an upgraded version of JL-2, with aerospike, more advanced carbon fiber.
Ramping up China nuclear scary stories to force China into nuclear arms deal?
新一代高速飞行器有个核心关键件——减阻装置,因其位于头部最顶端,常被人称为飞行器的“王冠”。火箭院总体设计部3室设计师胡振兴,就是这顶“王冠”的设计者,10年间,他的目标只有一个:为飞行器戴上轻质、高效的“王冠”。
Even with 10,000+ km range, it can barely reach CONUS from SCSI think they get the designation wrong, this very "JL-3" is probably an upgraded version of JL-2, with aerospike, more advanced carbon fiber.
Why do they make it a such a big deal, I mean it can carry 3 x 150kt-200kt warheads and that's it. Perhaps sending a signal that US can track loading process with their keyhole satellite? But the missile comes with canister and JL-2A didn't change that much in diameter or length, how do they tell whether it is JL-2 or JL-2A.
It is not a secret that PLAN didn't satisfy with JL-2 when 094 appeared unloaded and undeployed in CCTV report, and they were waiting for SLBM to reach CONUS and finally got them in tubes. US intelligence could just see the rapid deployment of JL-2A and determine it is "JL-3" instead of old JL-2.