@ougoah thank you very much, I learn a lot from your post above
how about French new warhead Tête nucléaire océanique (TNO or oceanic nuclear warhead) ? would it be roughly the same as current Chinese warhed? What is the designation of new Chinese warhead ? (after 535)
TNO is "more robust but less optimized" (source: )@bustead AFAIK the French currently have the M5.2 SLBM in service with the more modern TNO warhead. The TN75 warhead was used in the M5.1. The French are currently testing the M5.3 which is supposed to enter service in a couple of years.
We know that there is the 575 warhead, which is supposed to be a 150 kt warhead small enough to be fitted on cruise missiles easily. New ICBMs with HGVs may have a newer warhead design but we don't have any details yet.Lol I have no idea about Chinese warhead after 535 except we know that there have been many more developments after it. After all, 535 is 30+ years old design. This stuff is public info. We know when DF-31 first reached service and likely was in service before announcement on induction. We know the one that reached service in 2005 used 535 (single warhead). We have guesses on its yield and weight.
>Meanwhile, analysts caution that China is likely to load only some of its silos with missiles, and only some of those may be nuclear-tipped.China Accelerating Nuclear Buildup Over Rising Fears of US Conflict
There IS no such conv Df-41. A Space based EW system will not miss multiple missiles fired toward CN to distroy 300 silos on three sites.>Meanwhile, analysts caution that China is likely to load only some of its silos with missiles, and only some of those may be nuclear-tipped.
Ah yes, the famous conventional DF-41.
What I want to know is the growth of the mobile force. How many new DF-41 TELs are we inducting. The harping about those 300 silos grows old. Even if they were all loaded with DF-41s and China completed the early warning system today, the survivability isn't great. , stealth cruise missiles, depressed trajectory SLBMs etc. are all conceivable threats that might defeat LoW.
How obvious does sarcasm need to be?There IS no such conv Df-41.
The point isn't "missing" it. How much reaction time will the silo fields have to Tridents being launched from Bohai or just off Jiangsu? The US could try to destroy the silos directly that way or suppress them via high altitude pindown as described while using other weapons like cruise missiles to destroy the incapacitated silos.A Space based EW system will not miss 300 missiles fired toward CN to distroy 300 silos on three sites.
How obvious does sarcasm need to be?
The point isn't "missing" it. How much reaction time will the silo fields have to Tridents being launched from Bohai or just off Jiangsu? The US could try to destroy the silos directly that way or suppress them via high altitude pindown as described while using other weapons like cruise missiles to destroy the incapacitated silos.
Or if a B-21 just launched a bunch of LRSOs at them or something would China even detect that?