I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.
Looking at the Trident 2 figures in more detail, if the throw weight is only 67%, you get 77% extra range.
So if you half the throw weight, you could get double the range.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.
Which figures? Must have been posted a while back.Looking at the Trident 2 figures in more detail, if the throw weight is only 67%, you get 77% extra range.
So if you half the throw weight, you could get double the range.
Looking at the weight of the JL-2, the JL-2 is probably capable of reaching the USA while carrying a 1-ton payload. Unless China is absolutely inept at solid-fueled rockets (we know it isn't) that's the capability a 42 ton and 3 stage missile should have.How is the development work for the JL-3 SLBM been going on?
Seems like JL-3 would be fitted abroad the upcoming Type 096 SSBNs.
Once the JL-3 is ready for service, will the Type 094 SSBNs receive them too? Or their size limits would only permit the usage of JL-2?
Considering that JL-3 is a MASSIVE upgrade of China's sea-based nuclear triad.
My suspicion is that they purposely offset the point of impact. With the current real time telemetry and tracking technology, one does not need a direct hit to prove the accuracy of a missile.It's either subscale or they missed and the RV is nearer the camera (much nearer)
View attachment 85693
Either that, mockup is far smaller, or it was nuclear lolI suspect the impact is MUCH nearer the camera than it is the carrier. No way in hell an RV is going to have a fireball that big in relation to a carrier.
this for sale on ebay or where or how I can get oneThis looks like an 'official' model.