China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Xi told Biden that China's stockpile is much smaller than United States.

Hopefully that puts end on peoples claims that China has massive arsenal hidden in somewhere.
While there are not many peoples who claim what you insist they did, i'd like to know the source.
Why should China divulge details of their nuclear program to the US? Can that avert whatever is US planning to do against China?
What's the cause and effect here ?
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
FOBS just doesn't make much sense.
This is big news. So itsn't a FOBS.
It's much better to consider the issue purely from the perspective of orbital mechanics. Any small object moving under the influence of a much larger body's gravitation traces an ellipse (technically, it traces a conic section but let's not overcomplicate things). In the case of an ICBM, the ellipse it traces happens to intersect with the Earth. I believe the most sensible route for this platform is a quasi-orbital ellipse, in that the short arm of the ellipse intersects the Earth's atmosphere. As I mentioned in a previous post, you can use this to insert a glider with zero cumulative thermal loading (since up to that point it had travelled in space) at orbital speed (~8 km/s) relatively close to your target.

"FOBS" as it's popularly conceived usually means a circular orbit above the atmosphere. That's just about the stupidest way to deploy any weapon, as you will have to expend an unsightly amount of fuel bringing the vehicle down from orbit. By contrast, you would need none whatsoever if you programmed the trajectory properly.
Unless I am mistaken that's a proper US-style Global Prompt Strike weapon
Prompt Global Strike with Chinese Characteristics.
 

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
I thought it would be something like this.
FOBS just doesn't make much sense.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Holy shit, intercontinental HGV
I am really confused. Isn't this what people were saying the FOBS-HGV system did anyway? Partial orbit that circled the globe, then deorbit to release an HGV? How does his description differ at all from previous ones?

Also, didn't Russia already deploy an intercontinental HGV with the Avangard
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I thought it would be something like this.
FOBS just doesn't make much sense.
Well it's still FOBS + HGV as we guessed earlier, it's just the HGV part of it has really really long range.

The FOBS part may not be the intention, it's probably more in order for the HGV to achieve it's super long guide range it needs to re-enter at full orbital velocity and not just suborbital, so it just happens to make the launcher into a FOBS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top