China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

[Equation]

Hey fellas I found this article that might answer some of ya's questions. Now I'm NOT taking anyone side, so don't be biting and screaming at me. Read the article and judge if for yourself, and let me know what you think.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Hendrik_2000]

Strategy page another one of those retarded analyst who has no clue about China's 2nd artllery but blabber their own ignorance and spread their own personal opinion in the internet

 

[Vini_Vidi_Vici]

Not making any comments to further fuel the argument, but out of curiosity, where is "US official announcement of DF-41 launch”? DoD website? Or announced by Whitehouse Spokesperson.

 

[kroko]

Are you trying to act ignorant? CCTV do not need to know what secret 2nd artillery has. They just need to report what CCP asked them to published what the public needs to know about 2nd artillery.
Again , its you who need to prove its a hoax. Not us!

Listen, did CCTV ever stated that DF-41 existed ? AFAIK they only discussed if it existed or not. If you have additional evidence, present please.

I am asking you to present legit source to prove it its a hoax because some of us present third party source and you have NOT!

I don't to hear your own endless babbling. your personal opinion is worthless.

Base on your constant , overbearing sourgrape attitude, I think you could be a russian, worrying Chinese advancement surpassing the russian's hardwares.

my, calm down. Dont be mad with me. Its not my fault that you didnt read the last posts before making that post. And besides that freebeacon article, where is the "third party source" ? again, the onus is on you to prove that this DF-41 test happened.

and FYI, im not russian, far from it, lol.

 

[Franklin]

Hey fellas I found this article that might answer some of ya's questions. Now I'm NOT taking anyone side, so don't be biting and screaming at me. Read the article and judge if for yourself, and let me know what you think.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I didn't even read the article when i saw the words Strategy Page.

 

[TyroneG]

L Its not my fault that you didnt read the last posts before making that post. And besides that freebeacon article, where is the "third party source" ? again, t.

New York Times. Third time mentioned.

 

[Vini_Vidi_Vici]

New York Times. Third time mentioned.

NYT is an anti-China paper, just like the Washington Times and Washington post. Those papers would post anything to fuel the China-Threat argument. Newspapers don't write what's accurate, they write what's interesting and attention grabbing.
There's a lot of right-winged newspaper that constantly write bloated facts about China, often quoting from shaky sources. This doesn't make them credible.

 

[Hendrik_2000]

NYT is an anti-China paper, just like the Washington Times and Washington post. Those papers would post anything to fuel the China-Threat argument. Newspapers don't write what's accurate, they write what's interesting and attention grabbing.
There's a lot of right-winged newspaper that constantly write bloated facts about China, often quoting from shaky sources. This doesn't make them credible.

New york times might have their own agenda but they are not in the habit of lying. there is such thing as editing. Before any news is pubished , they are vetted and edited by their own editor for accuracy.

I like the way China basher have selected amnesia. Any news not to their liking they said oh it must be faked or cannot be determined its accuracy but if ONI produced the submarine noise chart they just gulp it lock stock and barrel. Even if those chart are produced before even the Chinese type 93, 95 are built! Amazing

No the pentagon or White house is not on habit of confirming or denying any russian or chinese missile test. Even though I bet they discussed among themsleves in the internal memo

 

[J-XX]

Lol. That was the same article that was presented in this thread a few posts behind. See my post nº 492.


Running out of arguments, hendrik ?

Another news article talking about another news article? Heh
BTW that news article (marked in bold) happens to be the same freebeacon article by bill gertz. Seems like a circle of information.

Now you are a mod? why disputing this test makes me a flamer and trying to stir trouble?


AFAIK, they discussed it on CCTV. They didn’t say that DF-41 existed. Just because CCTV is government owned doesn’t mean that they know everything. Or do you think that PLA would pass 2nd artillery secrets to journalists ??
As for proving, I don’t have to prove anything. Iam pointing to the fact that only freebeacon has report this news, no one else. They have been disproven before. Now you are telling me to prove that DF-41 doesn’t exist? It is you who are insisting in the veracity of this report. Prove it.

Lol. You have too much confidence on those two.

LOL you have too much confidence in your opinion.
Bill Gertz would would have more knowledge than everyone in this forum.
Not just Bill Gertz, but Richard Fisher and Mark Stokes aswell.

 

[J-XX]

Exactly that is my guess as well Either russian emigre or Eastern European immigrant living in Canada

no, he is not russian.

he is from an english speaking country for sure (US, UK, canada, australia).

my guess is american. (has that denial attitude about everything china does, and DF-41 is a missile to hit the mainland US so its natural).