BRICS & New World Order Thread

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1693554160080.png




Germany publishes strategy "against" BRICS. Some interesting insights regardless:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Berlin debates how to deal with BRICS’ increase in influence. The group admits six new members, embeds itself intensively in the Middel East and weakens the position of the US dollar.

The threat of apprehending Russia’s President Vladimir Putin on his way to South Africa was aimed at stirring up tensions within the BRICS group. Just before the summit and fully in line with the strategy of division, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock declared that every country must keep asking itself, “which partnership best suits its own values and interests.” It would not help to coordinate internally with Moscow, if Russia, “at the same time, literally bombs the grain deal, and countries such as Brazil or South Africa also suffer as a result.[1] The strategy did not work.
The New Development Bank (NDB), founded by BRICS in 2014 as an alternative to the World Bank, and which began work in 2015, is also transitioning away from the US dollar. Over the past few years, the NDB has accepted Egypt, the UAE, and Bangladesh. Uruguay is in the process of joining.
The portion of NDB activities that are not being transacted in US dollars is already at 22 percent, the major portion of which are loans denominated in yuan. According to NDB President Dilma Rousseff, in the period from 2022 – 2026, that amount should be increased to 30%.[10] This will include loans in Brazilian reais, South African rand and Indian rupees.
According to Berlin, continuing the attempt to divide BRICS will hardly be successful. Already before the BRICS summit, SWP was recommending that it would be better to adopt a sort of strategy of inclusion. This could possibly consist of opening major events, such as the Munich security Conference, more to issues pertaining to the Global South.[11]
The first declaration made by Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock after the BRICS summit in Johannesburg contained elements of this "strategy of inclusion". Baerbock announced that cooperation would continue, not only with the BRICS countries – with the exception of Russia and to a limited extent with China – but also with the new members. “We want to cooperate with the countries around the world, of course also with those who have views that differ from ours.”[12] It is unlikely that BRICS members would forego genuine independence for such offers of integration.
 

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 118010




Germany publishes strategy "against" BRICS. Some interesting insights regardless:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Berlin debates how to deal with BRICS’ increase in influence. The group admits six new members, embeds itself intensively in the Middel East and weakens the position of the US dollar.

Sometimes I wonder what it is about the west and their love of controlling others, they haven't gotten rid of imperialist thinking. On one hand, they want to "de-risk" from China citing national security but can't understand why the Global South also wants to "de-risk" from them under the same pretext. When you wake up and at a stroke of a pen snatch up someone's wealth in the name of sanctions don't be surprised when others want to change this system.

They have their own groups (G-7, NATO, etc) but refuse for others to create and form their own groups catering to their interests, honestly I don't get these people. Why does the rest of the world have to be slaves to them? How can you preach freedom but then deny others freedoms to do what's in their interests? Nobody is forming an alliance to destroy western civilization, we simply want alternatives to the current system.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Sometimes I wonder what it is about the west and their love of controlling others, they haven't gotten rid of imperialist thinking. On one hand, they want to "de-risk" from China citing national security but can't understand why the Global South also wants to "de-risk" from them under the same pretext. When you wake up and at a stroke of a pen snatch up someone's wealth in the name of sanctions don't be surprised when others want to change this system.

They have their own groups (G-7, NATO, etc) but refuse for others to create and form their own groups catering to their interests, honestly I don't get these people. Why does the rest of the world have to be slaves to them? How can you preach freedom but then deny others freedoms to do what's in their interests? Nobody is forming an alliance to destroy western civilization, we simply want alternatives to the current system.
It's cowardice. They wish to engage every fight as a group of countries isolating and picking on one country until it submits. 1 vs 1 they dare do nothing; no one in the West would dare challenge China or Russia alone, not even America. A group vs a group, they are also in fear, hence the constant ridiculous requests and coercions for countries that are sanctioned by the West to not work with other countries that are also sanctioned by the West. The worst nightmare of the West is every country they've offended and bullied coming together and backing each other. To preserve their need to cowardly bully countries many vs 1, they need to form groups but act like it's a crime against humanity for others to form groups.
 
Last edited:

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Sometimes I wonder what it is about the west and their love of controlling others, they haven't gotten rid of imperialist thinking. On one hand, they want to "de-risk" from China citing national security but can't understand why the Global South also wants to "de-risk" from them under the same pretext. When you wake up and at a stroke of a pen snatch up someone's wealth in the name of sanctions don't be surprised when others want to change this system.

They have their own groups (G-7, NATO, etc) but refuse for others to create and form their own groups catering to their interests, honestly I don't get these people. Why does the rest of the world have to be slaves to them? How can you preach freedom but then deny others freedoms to do what's in their interests? Nobody is forming an alliance to destroy western civilization, we simply want alternatives to the current system.
Money, natural resources, intelligentsia... The West has been sucking Third World countries dry for 500 years. Individual Third World country cannot stand up to the West and stop the bleeding. However, as a group with the backing of Russia and China, they can.
 

Fedupwithlies

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sometimes I wonder what it is about the west and their love of controlling others, they haven't gotten rid of imperialist thinking. On one hand, they want to "de-risk" from China citing national security but can't understand why the Global South also wants to "de-risk" from them under the same pretext. When you wake up and at a stroke of a pen snatch up someone's wealth in the name of sanctions don't be surprised when others want to change this system.

They have their own groups (G-7, NATO, etc) but refuse for others to create and form their own groups catering to their interests, honestly I don't get these people. Why does the rest of the world have to be slaves to them? How can you preach freedom but then deny others freedoms to do what's in their interests? Nobody is forming an alliance to destroy western civilization, we simply want alternatives to the current system.
Now you're starting to see what we see.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
Indonesia rejects Pentagon’s 'joint' press release attributed to Jakarta which criticized Moscow and Beijing..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Image
 

SDtom

New Member
Registered Member
Sometimes I wonder what it is about the west and their love of controlling others, they haven't gotten rid of imperialist thinking. On one hand, they want to "de-risk" from China citing national security but can't understand why the Global South also wants to "de-risk" from them under the same pretext. When you wake up and at a stroke of a pen snatch up someone's wealth in the name of sanctions don't be surprised when others want to change this system.

They have their own groups (G-7, NATO, etc) but refuse for others to create and form their own groups catering to their interests, honestly I don't get these people. Why does the rest of the world have to be slaves to them? How can you preach freedom but then deny others freedoms to do what's in their interests? Nobody is forming an alliance to destroy western civilization, we simply want alternatives to the current system.

Because with their controls they can influence and sometimes dedicate economic and political policies in other countries, even in developed countries like South Korea and Japan. With those powers, their companies can monopolize and lead the global progression of in almost all important sectors, they can destabilize or even split countries up to take their resources and reinforce their geopolitical interests.

However, if others and mainly the global south start to come together they will be able to fend for themselves from those attacks and enable them to have long term developments(costly physical infra, educational centers, communications networks, etc). That's why western medias keep smearing and attacking BRIC, China's BRI, AIIB, etc. Even with the much talked about BRIC and its recent expansion it is not strong or cohesive enough to be an effective working group today.
 
Top