Jesus, this can happen with every deal. A power of dumb arguments - there's a high risk that Japanese will start leaving Earth for Mars starting in 2030 and what will Australia do in such situation?
"This can happen with every deal" -- I agree completely, and I stated so as well in my previous posts:
"it is very prudent to consider the political relationships between the buyer and seller in a weapons deal, and it cannot be ignored."
And..
"That is why future political possibilities in any relationship are a very big factor for any sort of weapons deal, if the change in the relationship can influence the future operation and support of the weapon in question.
That is a consideration for any nation making any sort of weapons deal, and is an issue for Australiato consider in its submarine procurement as well."
Frankly I'm confused as to why you think the argument is a dumb one; Mr White is merely saying Aus needs to weigh up what a potential strategic partnership with Japan may mean for its own geopolitical flexibility in future, and how it may compare with going with a European sub.
He's not even making any statements or criticisms of each sub offer from a technical or capability point of view, but rather the primary concern in the article was about the affecy of the sub deal on Australia's geopolitics. Nothing wrong with that I think.