Australian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Some people never learn;

Saab Makes Late Pitch For Australian Sub Project

HELSINKI — With the clock ticking, Saab has pitched a late-hour proposal to the Australian government that could alter the outcome of that country’s submarine acquisition program, which had up to now been concentrated on bids by German and Japanese firms.

Australia’s Future Submarine project remains in a state of political flux after Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s ruling Liberal Party raised the possibility of the new submarines being built outside Australia. Such a move has been criticized by opposition leaders as a significant policy re-positioning action by the government that favors Japan’s Kawasaki/Mitsubishi’s Soryu-class offering. Germany’s Thyssen*Krupp is offering its Type 214 design..... to read more
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

To straighten it out Saab acquired ThyssenKrupp’s submarine shipyard which was formerly Kockums. So former Kochums and labor party pushing ASC is placing bids as well.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Canberra LHD

With final contractor sea trials now completed, plans are well underway for the majority of NUSHIP Canberra’s ship’s company to move down to the ship, which is currently berthed at Williamstown, Victoria.

Two-hundred out of the 380 strong Canberra team will move from Sydney to Williamstown on a RAAF KC-30 in the coming weeks, as momentum builds for the ship to be handed over to Navy.

Canberra’s Commanding Officer, Captain Jonathan Sadleir, said that the next three months will mark an end and a beginning.

“The coming three months mark the completion of a significant project milestone in terms of delivering the first Landing Helicopter Dock (LHD) into Navy, but will also mark the beginning of a new platform in our fleet that will shift and grow the Australian Defence Force’s capability to a completely new level,” Captain Sadleir said.

“I sense a huge shift in the ship's company this month as we make final preparations to go to Williamstown and embark in the ship.

“I think the team is really starting to absorb what it means to be a part the ship’s company that is bringing one of the largest and most complex acquisitions ever bought by the Australian Defence Force into our Navy,” he said.

There’s already more than 100 Canberra personnel down at the ship, involved in a range of work including compartment and systems inspections.

“With over 1100 compartments in the ship, the handing over of compartments has to be a graduated process over time and this is well underway to meet the ship’s handover schedule,” Captain Sadleir said.

The ship is berthed at BAE Systems dockyard at Williamstown alongside sister ship Adelaide. Canberra has just completed two weeks at sea conducting her final contractor sea trials off the east Australian coast and in Jervis Bay.

One focus for Canberra is certifying Duty Watch teams so that they can be responsible for the ship in harbour. This is the first step in a series of milestones for the ship’s company to achieve as they bring Canberra into the Fleet.

“Duty Watch certification will see us starting to bring the rest of the Fleet with us on the learning journey the ship’s company has been travelling for the last 18 months,” Captain Sadleir said.

“We look forward to working with Fleet and moving forward together as we stand the first LHD Duty Watch teams up.

“Apart from Duty Watch certification, we will also be storing the ship – this is a huge evolution that requires careful planning and a team focus,” he said.



Members of NUSHIP Canberra's ship's company apply vertical shoring during damage control training at the School of Survivability and Ship Safety.

Members of NUSHIP Canberra's ship's company apply vertical shoring during damage control training at the School of Survivability and Ship Safety.


Canberra will also conduct a period of ‘fast cruising’ before leaving Williamstown. This process tests the ship’s watch and station bill. The ship’s company will be onboard and will carry out scenarios as if at sea – including evolutions like leaving harbour, a man overboard, or a mechanical breakdown - all done while being berthed alongside the wharf.

Until this point, the ship’s company has been predominately based out of Sydney, where the ship will soon be home-ported. The ship is scheduled to move from Williamstown to Fleet Base East in Sydney in November where the Commissioning will take place on 28 November.

“I’m already so proud of what has been achieved to this point. The next few months until Christmas hold the biggest challenges yet and the work done by the ship's company so far provides me great confidence as we embark on this period in history,” Captain Sadleir said.

Canberra’s Leading Seaman Combat Systems Operator, Aumau Falepau, said she is excited about what is about to unfold.

“I’m very excited. The whole process of being part of bringing the first Landing Helicopter Dock into the Fleet has made people feel really valued. No matter what rank or what job you have everyone is learning, and the contribution of everyone is so important,” Leading Seaman Felapau said.

“There is a huge sense of anticipation amongst the ship’s company - people are just so keen to get on with the workload ahead.

“People are already imagining how they will set up their mess decks and work stations.

“The periods I’ve spent onboard so far have been very valuable – it’s definitely going to be a leg work out every day!” she said.

Canberra will be able to conduct amphibious operations and land a force of over 1,000 personnel by helicopter and water craft, along with all their weapons, ammunition, vehicles and stores. The LHDs will also be capable of conducting large-scale humanitarian and disaster relief missions.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

shen

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Soryu submarine deal: Japanese insiders warn sub program will cost more, hurt Australian jobs
ABC

By North Asia correspondent Matthew Carney September 15, 2014, 7:41 pm
Share

Facebook
Twitter
G+
Pinterest
Mail

Former senior Japanese military personnel have spoken out for the first time against the submarine deal the Abbott Government hopes to conclude with Japan.

Australia is considering buying 10 state-of-the-art Soryu class submarines from Japan, at a reported price of more than $20 billion.

But Japanese military insiders have warned that it will cost much more.

They told the ABC there was great reluctance within the Japanese military to share their expertise, and said it would take Australia decades to perfect the submarines' top secret technology.

The Federal Government wants to replace its Collins class submarines with Soryus by 2030.

The technology around the Soryu has been classified as top secret, but insiders have described them as the world's best non-nuclear powered submarine, with the capacity to stay submerged for weeks.

"It's an issue of hull strength. Japan has secret technology, like special steel and noise reduction. So the issue is how can we share it," Kazuhisa Ogawa, a former government defence adviser and one of Japan's top military analysts, said.

He said submarine warfare was decided by how quiet and deep the vessels could go.

Former Japanese submarine commander Toshihide Yamauchi was at sea for nearly 30 years.

He said it took Japan 60 years to develop and master the Soryu technology, and he believed they would not just give it all away.

Mr Yamauchi said Japan may provide just some of its knowledge to Australia.

"This is not just about building a hull, it's the most advanced submarine in the world and unless Australia studies it intensely and Japan helps, it will take decades," he said.

"Australia could have many technical and implementation problems."

Mr Yamauchi and Mr Ogawa both told the ABC that an Australian budget of $20 billion would mean that all the construction would have to happen in Japan.

And they said any attempts to do any of the work in Adelaide would double the price.

Mr Ogawa said if construction happened in Japan it would be bad for Australian jobs, but good for the Japanese economy.

"If the issue of military secrets can be resolved then Japanese business will be happy it will bring jobs and growth," he said.

Last week, Opposition Leader Bill Shorten demanded the Coalition Government stand by a pre-election commitment to build Australia's next fleet of submarines in South Australia.

Mr Shorten addressed a rally of workers from the Australian Submarine Corporation in Adelaide and told workers the nation's defence capabilities relied upon skilled workers as well as soldiers.

"Australia's security relies on four uniforms: Army, Navy, Air Force and Defence contractor, which is you," Mr Shorten said.

"If we fight we will win, and when we get rid of the rotten Abbott Government we will build our submarines in Australia, where it should be."
Deal will bind Japanese and Australian defence forces

Retired submarine commander Mr Yamauchi said he believed buying the Japanese subs was not in Australia's best interests, adding that Australia should keep developing its own industry.

"Australia should be clear about what kind of submarine it wants for its naval strategy for the later half of this century.

"Then it needs to ask Japan what part it can help with and get co-operation. Just to ask for the whole Soryu is not a good idea."

To run and service a fleet of 10 Soryu submarines will require at least 1,000 staff, who need to be trained for 10 to 15 years

Some of the training is expected to take place in Japan.

The deal has the potential to bind the Japanese and Australian defence forces together for decades.

Mr Yamauchi said it would mean Japan would have 20 Soryu subs, and Australia 10.

"They'll have a very big military power in the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans. Having common weapons systems will mean security ties will become stronger. China will be upset most by this."
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
How good are the Soryus? I guess no one really knows. How is the acoustic signature when compare to say Virginia or Seawolf in standard operating depth and speed?
 

shen

Senior Member
How good are the Soryus? I guess no one really knows. How is the acoustic signature when compare to say Virginia or Seawolf in standard operating depth and speed?

I'm sure it is quiet enough, as most modern SSKs are. The licensed Swedish AIP is also mature technology. One obvious problem is that Soryus is too short ranged for Australian operational need. Any modification to increase range would probably increase the price dramatically.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
I'm sure it is quiet enough, as most modern SSKs are. The licensed Swedish AIP is also mature technology. One obvious problem is that Soryus is too short ranged for Australian operational need. Any modification to increase range would probably increase the price dramatically.

Not necessarily.. while I agree that Australia is HUGE and surrounded by large bodies of water, their submarine force will be used mainly as a defensive tool and will operate primarily on the East end of the Indian Ocean, southern Pacific, the Coral Sea, South China seas and the waters near the Indo archipelago.

Unless of course the Kiwis have some odious plans to mount a large sea invasion of Australia that I am not aware of ;)

From a tactical, operation and strategic standpoint due to her long coastlines (and coastlines of her neighbors) having numbers is much much more important than range. 10-12 SSKs spread out over 3 bases would be a much wiser choice than say 5 or 6 SSNs.

USN is a different animal because they go thousands of miles and have bases spread all over the world.
 
Last edited:

shen

Senior Member
Not necessarily.. while I agree that Australia is HUGE and surrounded by large bodies of water, their submarine force will be used mainly as a defensive tool and will operate primarily on the East end of the Indian Ocean, southern Pacific, the Coral Sea, South China seas and the waters near the Indo archipelago.

Unless of course the Kiwis have some odious plans to mount a large sea invasion of Australia that I am not aware of ;)

From a tactical, operation and strategic standpoint due to her long coastlines (and coastlines of her neighbors) having numbers is much much more important than range. 10-12 SSKs spread out over 3 bases would be a much wiser choice than say 5 or 6 SSNs.

USN is a different animal because they go thousands of miles and have bases spread all over the world.

Collins class has almost twice the range of Soryu. It was specifically designed for Australian operational needs. Off the shelf Soryu is out of question on that alone. Australia may purchase some technologies from the Japanese and built the subs at home in order to gain enough domestic political support.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Collins class has almost twice the range of Soryu. It was specifically designed for Australian operational needs. Off the shelf Soryu is out of question on that alone. Australia may purchase some technologies from the Japanese and built the subs at home in order to gain enough domestic political support.

How do you know the range of the Soryu is half that of Collins? I would assume that data is kept pretty secret. Do not confuse AIP range with actual range. They are not the same.
AIP is a game changer in the world of diesel electric boats... the capabilities of Soryu would dwarf the Collins just based on the AIP itself nevermind the other advancements in the hull and electronics of the boat
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
How do you know the range of the Soryu is half that of Collins? I would assume that data is kept pretty secret. Do not confuse AIP range with actual range. They are not the same.

AIP is a game changer in the world of diesel electric boats... the capabilities of Soryu would dwarf the Collins just based on the AIP itself nevermind the other advancements in the hull and electronics of the boat
In addition to all of this...I doubt that an off the shelf Soryu will be in the cards.

The Australians will work with the Japanese to ensure a couple of things I believe:

1) That whatever their specific requirements may be are designed into the new build boats.
2) That the Australians will seek to have their version of the Soryu boats built in Australia.

I believe Japan is anxious to deal and take a place at the arms export table. I believe they will work out something acceptable to both sides.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top