Me too. I think it would be a good move.I would be more than happy to see BAE take over as prime contractor for the AWD project.
Agreed.After the completion of the Anzac class FFH at the Williamstown yard far too much knowledge and skills were lost due to a lack of follow on work. Given these skills and knowledge have again been built up with the construction of hull blocks for the AWD project and LHD fit out it's imperative that this workforce is kept together. It would seem on the face of it that the Government is heeding lessons learned from past experience.
That would be an interesting, and very logical move. Same hull but in a mulit-role frigate configuartion with far less AAW capabilities. I had also heard that the UKs Type 26 GCS was a considetration. Is that true?As I've already stated earlier in the thread, I suspect the Government would like to base the future frigate program around the F100 hull if it can be demonstrated that naval shipbuilding in this country is capable of delivering on time and on budget. Serial production of a portion of the F100 hull blocks for this program out of the Williamstown yard makes sense given it has already produced them for the AWD.
I am hoping that Australia teams with Japan and gets a good tranfer deal and a good building deal to build an improved, Australian specific version of the Soryu SSKs, right there in Australia.I also think it's makes sense that ASC in Adelaide is allowed to concentrate on Collins SSG maintenance work. Some major strides have been made in this program of late and needs to continue if they are to be a part of the future submarine requirement.
They are a very good, proven design, and the Australian's own expertise added to them will do nothing but imporve them, IMHO.