What I said is, to reach the same speed, with deck wind you can have shorter catapult.
I don't believe the length of a shorter catapult makes too much difference, given the overall deck size
The C13 steam catapult is 75m
What I said is, to reach the same speed, with deck wind you can have shorter catapult.
076 is an amphibious ship, not that big deckI don't believe the length of a shorter catapult makes too much difference, given the overall deck size
The C13 steam catapult is 75m
Does anyone know what version of the Red Banner 9 missile is currently used on the Type 52D and Type 55 destroyers? Is it the HHQ-9A or the HQ-9B? (Basically, is the HQ-9B able to be used on naval ships?)
Quora is a cesspool that has got infected with people who exists on the near end of Dunning Kruger effect. I remember Quora of 2014s and it was a very different place.Stupid question but why do modern navy doesn't build super battleship like Iowa/Yamato anymore? I read on Quora that arguably they are even better than modern destroyer one-on-one
Military platforms don't engage this way. What most military enthusiasts/followers don't understand is that it's about systems and logistics.one-on-one
Don’t really understand the question since SM-3 and SM-6 are very different missiles. The former is dedicated for ballistic missile interception and ASAT. The latter is the latest addition to complement the existing SM-2 series.Does the Chinese Navy have missile projects like SM-3/SM-6?
What i mean is whether these are chinese equivalent versions?SM-3 ve SM-6 çok farklı füzeler olduğu için soruyu gerçekten anlamıyorum. İlki balistik füze önleme ve ASAT'a adanmıştır. İkincisi, mevcut SM-2 serisini tamamlayan en son eklemedir.