American Economics Thread

KingBroward

New Member
Registered Member
Even if you assume all US' 3% growth is healthy and not simply inflation stacking, it's still a mathematical impossibility to catch up with China, which is accelerating away at 5%+.

Only hope US has at this point of catching up with China is the ww2 German strategy I.e. annexing lands into itself lol

Trump actually has that idea with Canada :D but Canada alone still does not make up for the GDP gap between the 2 global major powers. Maybe try all of the EU...
A US 3% growth rate vs. China's 5% growth rate would mean it would take 2-3 decades for China to converge to US GDP levels despite China having a 4x population of the United States
 

KingBroward

New Member
Registered Member
No actually, you read into it more than is actually there. Asians got STEM PhDs because we're good at STEM, and have a culture of excellence. And you imagined that that we did that for US immigration because Americans like to imagine that the world revolves around them. The enormous number of Chinese STEM degrees that have never applied to go to the US and the supermajority of which whom return to China after foreign studies prove you wrong, although your theory was so unreasonably American-centric that it was the one that needed proving in the first place, not the counter-argument.
I'm not going to reply to everything else since it's largely pointless but the 80% return rate isn't doctorates, it's mostly a gigantic surge in Chinese undergraduate seeking in other countries, but undergraduate degrees do not have paths to permanent residency in the United States (more generally). PhD earners largely stay in the US but regardless, the US economy is not make or break on ~3-4K replaceable students
Oh, this is some 5%<3% American mathematical illiteracy magic here? LOL
Capital deepening vs total factor productivity growth are different.
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Because keeping interest rates high serves no purpose when inflation is solved. It restrains the size of the economy for no good reason. Productivity shocks are deflationary
Then why it drop it even further? Lol
Powell literally said they he doesn't expect any more interest rate drop due to inflation creeping up.
 

KingBroward

New Member
Registered Member
Then why it drop it even further? Lol
Powell literally said they he doesn't expect any more interest rate drop due to inflation creeping up.
Interest rates moving too quickly in any one direction can cause financial sector chaos since a substantial amount of the financial sector borrows at fixed rates and lends at floating rates
 

kentchang

Junior Member
Registered Member
Interest rates moving too quickly in any one direction can cause financial sector chaos since a substantial amount of the financial sector borrows at fixed rates and lends at floating rates

No chaos. This is why the fixed rate is lower. This is why there are Swap agreements. Your view is very simplistic.
 

KingBroward

New Member
Registered Member
No chaos. This is why the fixed rate is lower. This is why there are Swap agreements. Your view is very simplistic.
Wholesale borrowing (brokered deposits/CDs/commercial paper/etc) tends to be the treasury rate plus a spread. Swap agreements don't diffuse risk as much as they just push it to another place in the financial sector (the Reserve Primary Fund writing a CDS on Lehman CP didn't remove the risk of a Lehman default, it just pushed it to AIG)
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Interest rates moving too quickly in any one direction can cause financial sector chaos since a substantial amount of the financial sector borrows at fixed rates and lends at floating rates
Nah, he signaled that he is concerned about inflation in his speech.

Credit card defaults are on the rise. They need to lower interest rates to help out.

US GDP is inflated mainly by its health care expenditure which is significantly inflated. Also caused people to go into debt to pay medical bills.

Without the over inflated health care, their GDP would be substantially lower
 
Top