manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Except the trade war and the pandemic have proven you wrong. China basically got through unscathed while everytime the US tried to hurt China, it hurt itself. You use your imaginary theory and supposition but we use real life experience.Except, no. 90% of US trade is contained within the Western Hemisphere. The same cannot be said about China. The US is basically autarkic, China is not and thus China would suffer more.
LOLOL The US loses everywhere. They lost to China in Korea, lost to China in Vietnam, losing ground in the SCS, and for a new low, just lost in Afghanistan to the Taliban, who apparently read Mao's little red book. But I'm sure no matter how badly the US loses, there will be people strapped to a copium mask imagining WIN WIN WIN LOLYeah, China would start a war (that the US would win) and China would have more casualities and hurt more of its trading partners. WIN WIN WIN for the United States
What's a CVN? You mean FONOPS? We tail them, we warn them, we dance, but we get the real results. It's disrespectful, but not really harmful to China.Then why is China so mad about the CVNs?
Don't know what you are talking about. What does "care so much about" mean? What sentence, what quote, what issue?Then why do even Chinese officials care so much about dollar hegemony?
Nope, these word games are exactly what I'm talking about. China's GDP briefly went to 5.8% but American GDP never soared. It was at best 3.1% but fell back into the low 2%. It's stable at best.Nope. In 2H 2019, China's growth rate fell below 6% but the US growth rate kept soaring.
This is a completely nonsensical response to a post about the Taliban winning in Afghanistan. The US keeps trying to inflict damage but always loses because China keeps growing and outgrowing the US in economics and tech. The US has never won anything against China, not any war, not in growth/development.Yeah so in a US/China contest where the goal is to be the hegemon, the US can keep inflicting more damage onto China than vice-versa so the US always win.
Growth needs to be solid, high tech growth, not puffy cheap low tech growth. This is China's transition from a large country to a high tech powerful country. You are the only one here inanely trying to argue that developing high tech self-sufficiency is wrong.And has inefficient allocation and has growth rates massively harmed.
No, China diversified clients and its trade grew while American trade shrank and American industries struggled with higher and unstable prices from poor domestic substitutes. The proof is in the numbers; China kept outgrowing the US and that's real winning.It would have been larger if the US didn't do tariffs and the tariffs hurt China more than the US so the US wins.
Blind hate is a smart strategy? LOL It only makes yourself ignorant and ill-prepared as you don't understand your foe. America wasted its energy trying to sabotage China while China's superior GDP growth was unstoppable. China's trade with all countries, even those who hate China like India, exploded upwards. China's projects in other countries are to be paid off by them and Huawei is forging ahead with its profits, it's 5G, and chip sufficiency. It's not about immediate profits; it's about quality long term growth and this is just perfect for China's quality long term growth to self-sufficiency.It's a smart strategy, adaptive as conditions changed. Now, all Chinese infrastructure projects in the developed world are dead in the water, Huawei's market share is gone in Europe, the EU-China CAI is dead, and that's only the start of China's European market access.
Get out of here with the ridiculous predictions of what would have happened from 1800. The US has its own system and China uses ours. Immigration is not the topic here and not China's pursuit.Most of US history? If the US closed immigration in 1800, the US would only have 100M people. It now has 330M very productive people. Heck, even Alabama has a higher GDPPC than China.
What an idiotic response. If the US prints money and devalues its currency, that's endless growth. If others follow then they print themselves into the ground? LOL No! There is certain production capacity. If the US prints more dollars, it takes more to buy it; if it prints less, it takes less to but it. Same for everyone else.So they devalue their own currencies and thus have import inflation. Even better for the US since the EMs print themselves into the ground and that hurts China's exports markets but it doesn't hurt the US since the US is functionally autarkic.
China's lithography is far ahead of America's, and while China's jet engines are a weakness, the are sufficient, improving, and among the handful of countries in the world that can make an engine much less an engine in excess of 100kN. On the other hand, Chinese quantum communications, AI, magnetic rail tech is ahead of the US. And China spent far less on these things. China is much faster and more efficient.Nope. The US war machine is responsible for cutting edge research in computing, in materials science and in integrated circuits that make China's lithography and aircraft engines a joke.
In the pipeline but American government specializes in waste and getting so little for so much money, and so long time. They have no chance at competing with China.And even then, state governments spend so much money on capital formation and now the federla government is only going to spend more. So much capital formation in the pipeline
Nope, all of China's cities will be fine but the US will be in shambles, at least in its pride, but physically as well if it pushes for it.Nope. Shanghai, Xiamen and Guangzhou will be in shambles but San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle will see life continue as norma.
Only against small countries. Because a nation chose the US over Venezuela/Iran, that means the same for China? LOL American power wanes by the day. They try to threaten, coerce, bribe and beg but in the end Chinese business is better and people will choose their own interests. Chinese goods power the world. American threats drag unwilling "allies" to sail in circles and quickly go home.Nope. It would force all the world to choose between the US & China and they always choose the US (just look at the Israeli desalination plant, the UK nuclear plant, the UK HS2, Huawei, etc, etc). They always always always choose the US because US coercieve capacities are amazing.
LOL Gonna talk like that? Chinese/Russian agents hacked the US election, split America in 2, then caused Americans to ransack their own capital building and set fire to cities all across America. If America can ever recover, it is scarred forever.LOL, a few CIA agents caused terrorism in Xinjiang and that caused China to spend billions of dollars on counterterrorism
The CAI was about giving Europeans more access to China's market and when they messed up, China took it away from them. See how they complain; do you see Chinese complaining?and gave the US a tool to sabotage the EU-China CAI and a pretext for more sanctions. It cost the US a few thousand dollars and China tens of billions.
The US can't control ground that's 3 feet back from where it just stood against goat farmers with AKs. The US is losing control everywhere while China takes control of the future in tech and economy.The US controls this escalation ladder
Last edited: