TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
The reported water pressure and plumbing issues of the Kun probably don't help matters combined with the limited numbers of trained aviation fixed wing aviation sailors as the Russians only have the one carrier.
I posted the following on the Indian Military News thread last week:
So, far we the Indians have announced that a Talwar frigate will escort her out of port, soon to be met by an AOR vessel. The Indians have announced that it will be the Deepak, A50, which was launched in 2010. Somewhere between Norway and the English channel, three more Indian vessels will join with them, but the Indians have not announced who they will be yet.
Perhaps one will be the Akula nuclear attack submarine, INS Chakra. I would expect two more of their modern indigenous Shivalik frigates, which are as big as most traditional destroyers.
Perhaps INS Trikand, F51 will be that first Talwar Frigate. She is their latest Talwar class and was also built in Russia. She was recently in Portsmouth, England.
We also know now, that once through the Suez canal, that India's other Carrier, INS Viraat, R22, will meet with the group and conduct exercises with the Virkamaditya in the Arabian Sea and then also escort her home.
Anyhow here is the group we are getting a picture of. The Akula and two Shivalik are my own guesses...we will know for sure later:
INS Virkamaditya Aircraft Carrier, 44,500 tons
INS Trikand, F51, Guided-missile Frigate, 4,050 tons
INS Deepak, A50, AOR Vessel, 27,000 tons
INS Satpura, F48, Guided-missile Frigate, 6,800 tons
INS Sahyadri, F49, Guided-missile Frigate, 6,800 tons
INS Chakra, Nuclear attack submarine,
INS Viraat, R22, Indian STOVL Carrier
I expect the Viraat will have a couple of her own escorts too. If the Indians end up with this group of six vessels in the Vikram group, and then another three or four in the Viraat group, when they combine, it will be an impressive dual Carrier Task Force in the Arabian Sea and send a powerful message..
Very nice ships, and they will extend India's already considerable naval power in the Indian Ocean. I still think India would have been better off taking the US deal of free USS Kitty Hawk for buying F-18s, even with the political strings.
The US never offered India Kitty Hawk. Never happened.
Firstly the USN is not in the habit of selling off or giving away super carriers.
This is a rumor that started after some Indian journalist visited the Kitty Hawk while operating in the Bay of Bengal and asked the CO what would happen to the ship when it is decommissioned in 2008..I will paraphrase his answer. "It would be nice if we could give it to an ally like India".
Go to 54 seconds on the video in this link. That's how the rumor got started about Kitty Hawk. The Hawk is presently resting at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton WA.
Read the illustrious history of CV-63. No where does this history state that the Hawk was up for sale or to be given to India.
The US never offered India Kitty Hawk. Never happened.
Firstly the USN is not in the habit of selling off or giving away super carriers.
]
the USN has not sold off a major surface or submersible combatant for decades. And never a carrier. The only offer I know of was a option given to Australia for a Essex class in the 1960s. The Australian Navy turned it down because the cost to refit her would have been prohibitive.
[video=youtube;kL0GAqAdc5w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL0GAqAdc5w[/video]
Exactly. The US never did make any kind of offer whatsoever, just as you say Popeye. In fact the Department of the Navy itself squashed the claim that same year with a very direct and terse announcement:The US never offered India Kitty Hawk. Never happened.
This is a rumor that started after some Indian journalist visited the Kitty Hawk while operating in the Bay of Bengal and asked the CO what would happen to the ship when it is decommissioned in 2008..I will paraphrase his answer. "It would be nice if we could give it to an ally like India".
US Navy Spokes person said:"The Navy has no plans of transferring the Kitty Hawk to India."
Typically, hot rumors need something spicy to get started — sin, scandal, etc. — not 80,000 tons of old steel. But when it comes to the future of the carrier Kitty Hawk, which is to leave its forward-deployed assignment in Japan later this year, the scuttlebutt is flying: Will the ship stay in the fleet as a training carrier? Will the Navy give it to India?
Official answers: no and no. But mess-deck intelligence has a way of enduring past denials.
Aboard the carrier George Washington, which is to take the Kitty Hawk's place in Japan this year, rumors are circulating that the older ship will move to Naval Station Mayport, Fla., to become a training carrier, a junior officer said. But sources at Naval Air Forces in San Diego have said that "no such ideas are currently being entertained" and that the ship will steam to San Diego and leave service.
The Feb. 27 visit of Defense Secretary Robert Gates only enflamed speculation in the Indian and Russian news media — and, more recently, in a U.S. magazine — that the Pentagon could give the Kitty Hawk to India if New Delhi agrees to buy a number of U.S.-made F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. The idea was to drive a wedge between the Indian government and the Russian defense industry, which has struggled to deliver an old Soviet aircraft carrier that India bought years ago. With the Kitty Hawk, India would get a carrier, Russia would lose its sale and Boeing would move a nice set of brand-new aircraft.
Not gonna happen, the Navy says.
"The Navy has no plans to transfer Kitty Hawk to India, nor is this a subject of discussion between our navies at any level," Navy spokesman Lt. Clay Doss said.