2020/2021 Tokyo Summer Olympics

KYli

Brigadier
You can't have a good football team when not many Chinese play football to begin with. I believe the numbers of professional football players have dropped to a few thousands just a few years ago before recovery to tens of thousands recently compare with hundreds of thousands in other countries.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I wanna ask your opinion on sports scene between China and Western nations namely I guess the US. We know in China that many Olympic athletes get talent spotted at young age and enrolled in special sports school. In US, it's through the NCAA system. Which do you think fits china better? Should they stick to wat they are familiar with or try a mix of the two?

Also the sports culture is embedded deeply in American society to the point of fanatical worshipping of sports stars and teams by the general population. In china I guess academics and education are more deeply ingrained and emphasized. While this is good for producing engineers and scientists, sports and fitness do contribute to a more well balanced life and healthier population.
Of course, Americans are still more obese in general but their sports culture does seem to contribute to their much better performance in team sports .

For selfish reasons I like to see china perform well in team sports especially in the higher profile men's games like football and basketball. Just yesterday, France had 3 teams in the finals on one day. What is the best way to achieve better performance in this area for China? I don't think more investment is the answer.

France had NBA players and also does the state sponsorship model. Indeed so does UK (through UK Sport) and Australia.

Only the US does not have a direct government sports sponsorship model.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

KYli

Brigadier
I wanna ask your opinion on sports scene between China and Western nations namely I guess the US. We know in China that many Olympic athletes get talent spotted at young age and enrolled in special sports school. In US, it's through the NCAA system. Which do you think fits china better? Should they stick to wat they are familiar with or try a mix of the two?

Also the sports culture is embedded deeply in American society to the point of fanatical worshipping of sports stars and teams by the general population. In china I guess academics and education are more deeply ingrained and emphasized. While this is good for producing engineers and scientists, sports and fitness do contribute to a more well balanced life and healthier population.
Of course, Americans are still more obese in general but their sports culture does seem to contribute to their much better performance in team sports .

For selfish reasons I like to see china perform well in team sports especially in the higher profile men's games like football and basketball. Just yesterday, France had 3 teams in the finals on one day. What is the best way to achieve better performance in this area for China? I don't think more investment is the answer.
It doesn't matter what China does. Men basketball and volleyball skewed too much towards right talents that China is unlikely to have. Beside, NBA is only popular in the US and China. Compare with FIFA, NBA doesn't have the same influence and appeal to the world audience. I would think focusing upon Women basketball, football, and volleyball is more productive. For men team sports, football should be prioritized. Basketball should maintain being the best team in Asia. Men Volleyball should not be bothered.
 

getready

Senior Member
For this Olympics, I don't think China "over-performed". I think they more or less got what they set out to do, plus or minus a few surprise victories and some unexpected losses.

London 2012's 38 golds was a carry over momentum from the 2008 Beijing Olympics, where China put enormous investments to ensure success. Rio was when those momentum fizzled out. Tokyo's medal count reflects the ever upward projection since the early 2000s, disregarding the bump of 2008 and 2012. So, from here on out, I'm looking forward to 40 plus golds from the Chinese contingent no matter where the Olympics are to be held.
I agree with this.


In summary of the games, I think it's more or less within expectations. China performed strongly in areas they are expected to perform well in traditionally. Diving weightlifting table tennis etc. Gymnastics maybe some will consider as underperformed but since 2008 china has been on steady decline, more so for the women than men. So results are not unexpected although china still had 3 gold and a few silvers. Shooting we also did well imo.

These games afaik we didn't have a truly breakthrough surprise in gold medal like we did in athens with liu xiang. Su's achievement is truly amazing but he didn't medal if we really reduced it to tangible terms. I was looking forward to Zheng Nina who competed in heptathlon but I guess the tokyo games is too soon for her. Paris will be where she reaches her peak years. Still she was the only Asian in the final, it's very encouraging to see.

The weakness in team events is still very evident here. Women's volleyball, possibly our lone medal hope in team event, bombed due to injury and bad form.

In the future, I think people are concentrated on track and field plus swimming as they have alot of medals on offer and they are considered the main draw of the Olympics. As they should. But we should not also forget disciplines like cycling, rowing and the new sports introduced in Olympics. All these provide opportunities that outside of the usual ones.

I do not know enough of martial arts sports so I won't comment aside from suggesting karate should be out. And although I feel for hua tian, Equestrian too. Along with the very outdated pentathlon.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I wanna ask your opinion on sports scene between China and Western nations namely I guess the US. We know in China that many Olympic athletes get talent spotted at young age and enrolled in special sports school. In US, it's through the NCAA system. Which do you think fits china better? Should they stick to wat they are familiar with or try a mix of the two?

Also the sports culture is embedded deeply in American society to the point of fanatical worshipping of sports stars and teams by the general population. In china I guess academics and education are more deeply ingrained and emphasized. While this is good for producing engineers and scientists, sports and fitness do contribute to a more well balanced life and healthier population.
Of course, Americans are still more obese in general but their sports culture does seem to contribute to their much better performance in team sports .

For selfish reasons I like to see china perform well in team sports especially in the higher profile men's games like football and basketball. Just yesterday, France had 3 teams in the finals on one day. What is the best way to achieve better performance in this area for China? I don't think more investment is the answer.
I'll redirect you to the third paragraph here which addresses what China can do but probably shouldn't:

If China wants to be more competitive in team sports and rich people sports like swimming, it will need to nurture sports culture in its population. This will hinder its academic focus and its tech drive, which is the real competition, not a game. Right now, China does a really great job of getting as many golds as it can for morale-boosting using a relatively genetically homogenous population and picking only the poorest people in this population in a state-directed effort so as not to hinder the academic focus of its cities and its middle-upper class. China's gold medalists are specifically selected for showing athletic potential in early youth but poor academic potential as no parent is likely to give up a class ace to a sports trainer; it is a last resort for kids who don't have a reasonable path to an academic future. This means that China correctly prioritizes education and technology and uses what's left over for sports.

Do I think that China should nurture sports culture in its entire population to win more Olympic medals? No, not now. Now we need as much speed as possible in the tech race. Once America is beaten, however, China can go in this direction, primarily for promoting life balance and health, and secondarily to be competitive in international sports. By this time, China can maintain its tech lead with its very large and very intelligent population on cruise control and afford to divert these resources to sports and athleticism. It will probably even happen naturally without much government initiative when China is ahead and the pressure is off. However, I have to note that going into cruise control is dangerous; because you can't pull out. You'll be locked into it as people go willingly from high pressure to low pressure lifestyle but not the other way around. The US would probably happily throw away its gold medals if it could put its population into Manhattan Project mode on 5G and lithography/semiconductors. But it's not going to happen. Once the population is in BBQ and beer sports fist-bump mode, it's easier to move a mountain than to move them back into tech competition mode.

But now is not the time; now is the final dash for tech supremacy, so the final dash for the Olympic medals is on the backburner. China's approach now is the best; get as many medals as possible without disturbing the culture of insatiable, no cost too great obsession for academic/STEM excellence.
 
Last edited:

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I agree with this.


In summary of the games, I think it's more or less within expectations. China performed strongly in areas they are expected to perform well in traditionally. Diving weightlifting table tennis etc. Gymnastics maybe some will consider as underperformed but since 2008 china has been on steady decline, more so for the women than men. So results are not unexpected although china still had 3 gold and a few silvers. Shooting we also did well imo.

These games afaik we didn't have a truly breakthrough surprise in gold medal like we did in athens with liu xiang. Su's achievement is truly amazing but he didn't medal if we really reduced it to tangible terms. I was looking forward to Zheng Nina who competed in heptathlon but I guess the tokyo games is too soon for her. Paris will be where she reaches her peak years. Still she was the only Asian in the final, it's very encouraging to see.

The weakness in team events is still very evident here. Women's volleyball, possibly our lone medal hope in team event, bombed due to injury and bad form.

In the future, I think people are concentrated on track and field plus swimming as they have alot of medals on offer and they are considered the main draw of the Olympics. As they should. But we should not also forget disciplines like cycling, rowing and the new sports introduced in Olympics. All these provide opportunities that outside of the usual ones.

I do not know enough of martial arts sports so I won't comment aside from suggesting karate should be out. And although I feel for hua tian, Equestrian too. Along with the very outdated pentathlon.

China has a good shot in boxing. Zou Shiming won gold in 2008 and 2012.

Equestrian can be improved. They are one of the best Asian teams and with good coaches they can get within at least top 8. China has a long cavalry tradition and it should be put to use.

Karate isn't permanent.
 

getready

Senior Member
I think Park Ji-Sung is borderline world-class. But Son Heung-min is actually well within world class. I watched him play in the EPL, he is easily within the top 10 best EPL players. Son Heung-min started his professional football career at age of 18 in the German Bundesliga. He was practically trained into a professional footballer in Germany.

If China wants to produce some truly world-class players, it has to be done in the best football leagues in the world. Right now China is just throwing money at the problem. i.e.: Buying football players and coaches from Europe, Brazil, etc with ridiculous money. What China should do is to scout the best footballing talents around the country and allow the biggest European clubs to sign them. China should have some fine talents, but the Chinese football league is still not mature yet. Its not a good place for them to develop. These potential talents need to complete their training in the best overseas leagues to truly realize their potential. Kinda like how China sends their brightest minds to the best overseas universities in the past. Many of these people then came back to China and upgraded its learning institutions.
I think it's difficult to agree on world class players sometimes cuz there is really no strict definition of the meaning. It can be pretty arbitrary as it's not like a certain amount of goals or appearance for national team qualify a player as one. While I dun think Son is a true world class player I can understand why those who consider him as such.

The days of China throwing money at foreign players and coaches is over. There was a crackdown on this practice few years ago. I agree with the scouting and letting them play in top European leagues. But the Chinese football authorities know this too. Problem is reality bites. Simply there is no great young talent. A few with potential who were sent to football teams overseas did not progress as well as expected. The problem is much more difficult to tackle and cannot be solved in near future. Unlike Brazil or Argentina or the European countries, there simply isn't a conveyor belt of young talents being produced year by year. Heck even Korea and Japan is doing much better than China on this front.

The problems with Chinese football have been well documented. I guess I'm just going to repeat ad nauseam wats already been discussed for over a decade.
 

MixedReality

Junior Member
Registered Member
I agree with this.


In summary of the games, I think it's more or less within expectations. China performed strongly in areas they are expected to perform well in traditionally. Diving weightlifting table tennis etc. Gymnastics maybe some will consider as underperformed but since 2008 china has been on steady decline, more so for the women than men. So results are not unexpected although china still had 3 gold and a few silvers. Shooting we also did well imo.

These games afaik we didn't have a truly breakthrough surprise in gold medal like we did in athens with liu xiang. Su's achievement is truly amazing but he didn't medal if we really reduced it to tangible terms. I was looking forward to Zheng Nina who competed in heptathlon but I guess the tokyo games is too soon for her. Paris will be where she reaches her peak years. Still she was the only Asian in the final, it's very encouraging to see.

The weakness in team events is still very evident here. Women's volleyball, possibly our lone medal hope in team event, bombed due to injury and bad form.

In the future, I think people are concentrated on track and field plus swimming as they have alot of medals on offer and they are considered the main draw of the Olympics. As they should. But we should not also forget disciplines like cycling, rowing and the new sports introduced in Olympics. All these provide opportunities that outside of the usual ones.

I do not know enough of martial arts sports so I won't comment aside from suggesting karate should be out. And although I feel for hua tian, Equestrian too. Along with the very outdated pentathlon.

Swimming, athletics, rowing, canoeing, cycling should be the targets. They have many events where just a couple of great athletes can win multiple golds. They are racing events where there is no influence of judges. Swimming and athletics get the most media attention during the Olympics.
 

getready

Senior Member
I'll redirect you to the third paragraph here which addresses what China can do but probably shouldn't:

If China wants to be more competitive in team sports and rich people sports like swimming, it will need to nurture sports culture in its population. This will hinder its academic focus and its tech drive, which is the real competition, not a game. Right now, China does a really great job of getting as many golds as it can for morale-boosting using a relatively genetically homogenous population and picking only the poorest people in this population in a state-directed effort so as not to hinder the academic focus of its cities and its middle-upper class. China's gold medalists are specifically selected for showing athletic potential in early youth but poor academic potential as no parent is likely to give up a class ace to a sports trainer; it is a last resort for kids who don't have a reasonable path to an academic future. This means that China correctly prioritizes education and technology and uses what's left over for sports.

Do I think that China should nurture sports culture in its entire population to win more Olympic medals? No, not now. Now we need as much speed as possible in the tech race. Once America is beaten, however, China can go in this direction, primarily for promoting life balance and health, and secondarily to be competitive in international sports. By this time, China can maintain its tech lead with its very large and very intelligent population on cruise control and afford to divert these resources to sports and athleticism. It will probably even happen naturally without much government initiative when China is ahead and the pressure is off. However, I have to note that going into cruise control is dangerous; because you can't pull out. You'll be locked into it as people go willingly from high pressure to low pressure lifestyle but not the other way around. The US would probably happily throw away its gold medals if it could put its population into Manhattan Project mode on 5G and lithography/semiconductors. But it's not going to happen. Once the population is in BBQ and beer sports fist-bump mode, it's easier to push a mountain than to move them back into tech competition mode.

But now is not the time; now is the final dash for tech supremacy, so the final dash for the Olympic medals is on the backburner. China's approach now is the best; get as many medals as possible without disturbing the culture of insatiable, no cost too great obsession for academic/STEM excellence.
Ah thanks for the detailed explanation. Perhaps for selfish reason as a sports fan and China supporter, I let personal emotions get the better of whats really good for China right now.
 

getready

Senior Member
Kinda having withdrawals now that the Olympics are over. The 16 days been really fun to catch the games and the spectacle and following up with people's reaction on weibo. I know most will not agree with me but really like watching the Olympics lol. Maybe more than even the world cup.
 
Top