2014 Ukrainian Maidan Revolt: News, Views, Photos & Videos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Piotr

Banned Idiot
Kiev snipers hired by Maidan leaders
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Estonia confirms authenticity of Paet-Ashton conversation on Kiev snipers
The Estonian Foreign Ministry has confirmed the authenticity of a telephone conversation posted on the Internet between Minister of Foreign Affairs Urmas Paet and EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs Catherine Ashton regarding the events in Ukraine, the press service of the Estonian Foreign Ministry reports.

"It is extremely unfortunate that this wiretapping was conducted. It’s not an accident that this conversation was posted (on the Internet) today," Paet said. Earlier, he said that the conversation with Ashton took place last week, immediately after the head of the MFA’s return from Ukraine to Estonia.

"My conversation with Ashton took place last week directly after my visit to Ukraine. At that time, I was in Estonia already," he said.

The diplomat refrained from more detailed comments until he "sees the recording".

The conversation between Paet and Ashton took place on February 26, after Paet’s visit to Ukraine. During the conversation, Paet told what he had learned at the meetings in Kiev, and expressed concern about the situation, the press service said. Particular interest was inspired by Paet’s words with reference to doctor Olga Bogomolets who had been rendering medical assistance to the victims in the Maidan, about snipers shooting at people in Kiev.

Kiev snipers hired by new coalition, not Yanukovych - Estonian FM to Ashton

The snipers who shot at protesters and police in Kiev were allegedly hired by Maidan leaders, according to a leaked phone conversation between the EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Estonian foreign affairs minister, which has emerged online.

"There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition," Paet said during the conversation.

"I think we do want to investigate. I mean, I didn’t pick that up, that’s interesting. Gosh," Ashton answered.
The call took place after Estonia’s FM Urmas Paet visited Kiev on February 25 at the peak of clashes between the pro-EU protesters and security forces in the Ukrainian capital.

Paet also recalled his conversation with a doctor who treated those shot by snipers in Kiev. She said that both protesters and police were shot at by the same people.

"And second, what was quite disturbing, this same Olga [Bogomolets] told as well that all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among policemen and then people from the streets, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides," the Estonian FM stressed.

Ashton reacted to the information by saying: "Well, yeah…that’s, that’s terrible."

"So that she then also showed me some photos she said that as a medical doctor she can say that it is the same handwriting, the same type of bullets, and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened," Paet said.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Kiev snipers hired by Maidan leaders
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Well, I have seen the videos and anyone on this forum can watch them, of Ukrainian Security Police firing on the crowds of protestors.

I have seen the videos, and anyone on this forum can also watch them, of snipers, amongst the Security Police and security police walking around them, firing on the protestors.

This is all "he said, she said," with no substantiation, and is a pathetic attempt to blame the killing of the protestors on the protestors themselves.

...and US Imperialism? Please. The US has not created an empire of conquered and vassal states. In fact, in war, when the US does defeat an enemy, it generally spends hundreds of billions of dollars and years of time helping that nation rise back to its feet...and sometimes to the point where it challenges the US itself economically. So, drop the imperialism tag. It's another worn out and demonstrably false propaganda tactic.

On SD Forum, Bold Blue and Red text is reserved for the use of Moderators.

Piotr, you are new here. Read the Forum rules. We try and steer clear of pure ideology and attacks against other nations on this forum, and it is strictly moderated to avoid that and keep our discussions reasoned and technical for the most part. If you avoid that, and stick with it, you will do fine. If you do not...you wont.

This is the second time I have had to mention such things to you...the other being on the PRC Geostrategic Position thread. Consider this one a
WARNING.


These articles you are posting are full of attempts to do that. It is tough to do in this age where anyone with a cell phone is a reporter with a world-wide audience waiting for them to simply upload it...often from the very spot that they have taken it.

Also, for others, the Maidan Protests were not led by or spearheaded by neo-Nazis. The combined major Christian Churches of Ukraine and the Jewish Synagogues issues a letter, supporting the removal of the President by their Parliament, supporting the protestors, and calling on the people of Ukraine to pray and be resolute in their freedoms and faith, calling on the leaders of the west to support them in Ukraine with prayers, and calling on the people of Russia to protest the actions of their own government.

Those many church leaders would not support any type of activity spearheaded by neo-Nazis. They simply were not. But it is a good prooganda ploy by the the Russians to gen up domestic support. Any Russian who actually believes they are fighting neo-Nazis on their borders will support the effort.

Are their neo-Nazis in Ukraine?

Of course there are. They are very small groups of them in almost every free nation on earth. Some allow them to spew their garbage more than others, but they are universally condemned or ignored.

Enough said.

In the end, as I see it, this entire issue now boils down to this:

1) Putin has outmaneuvered western leaders completely on this. He clearly had strong contingencies in place and planned well before the Sochi Olympics and was prepared, despite the unexpected results of the Maidan protests, to act in what he considered Russia's interests, and despite treaties that his own nation signed guaranteeing the borders of the Ukraine.

2) The Crimea is once again in Russian hands, and they will not be giving it back to the Ukraine in any event. Crimea will vote for total autonomy or independence and for Russian protectorate status.

3) Western leadership is weak and ineffectual. There will possibly be some economic sanctions...but Russia has the ability to counter them in large measure because of the energy situation and the gas he supplies to the whole of Europe.

4) Russia may foster similar votes to that which is going to occur in the Crimea in one or two other southeastern Ukrainian provinces...or not. we shall have to wait and see.

5) The Ukraine will need to continue to be very careful in its efforts to retain the integrity of the rest of their nation. They need to walk a very fine line between showing Russia and Putin their commitment to resist and fight any move by Russian forces to the north and west of Crimea...but to do so in such a way that does not invite that very advance. IOW< they must prepare, show firmness, but not be either precipitous or rash.

6) As to the west in general, and the US specifically. Until the US political landscape changes and a stronger, more assertive and experienced administration is elected, the overall effectiveness of any reaction by the US is going to remain tame at best, and ineffectual in general.

That's just the way things are. Time will tell where it goes from here...but I think that it pretty much how things are at this point.
 
Last edited:

Lezt

Junior Member
6) As to the west in general, and the US specifically. Until the US political landscape changes and a stronger, more assertive and experienced administration is elected, the overall effectiveness of any reaction by the US is going to remain tame at best, and ineffectual in general.

That's just the way things are. Time will tell where it goes from here...but I think that it pretty much how things are at this point.

Yes, they need a good old Reagan, FDR, Bush Sr, Theodore,...

What would it take to get the US/Nato/EU to send in 2 divisions to stabilize Ukraine? I doubt that Putin is ready for real war...

But Putin might force a war, fraking in the USA, shale gas reserves in Europe and China proper would mean that sooner than later Russia no longer can push Europe around by shutting off the gas tap.

Crimea also so happen to cut one of the land routes for the new "silk road" which the middle eastern nations would have been keen to develop as aforementioned, the US fraking industry will make them impotent compared to the OPEC of 1970s
 
Do you know how many soldiers Ukraine mobilized so far (OK, the exact figure, for this early morning of March 6, for example, would be classified, but I can't find even a rough estimate, I mean if it's 10 thousand, 100 thousand, half a million, ... new guys in barracks, holding their rifles)? By the way, wikipedia says: Reserve personnel 1,000,000
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Lezt

Junior Member
I think...

This is the first time in history that a Nuclear armed state invaded another Nuclear armed state.

Ukraine have more than 12K nuclear warheads and 25K IRBMs; that is by no means a push over.
 

delft

Brigadier
@Lezt
Crimea also so happen to cut one of the land routes for the new "silk road" which the middle eastern nations would have been keen to develop as aforementioned, the US fraking industry will make them impotent compared to the OPEC of 1970s
How's that? The old Silk Road was as complex as the Ho Chi Minh trail and the new one will be as complex through Central Asia and Turkey or Russia but not through the Crimea because it makes much more sense to continue by rail to other European countries.
This is the first time in history that a Nuclear armed state invaded another Nuclear armed state.

Ukraine have more than 12K nuclear warheads and 25K IRBMs; that is by no means a push over.
Some fifteen years ago all nuclear weapons were removed from Ukraine.
 

jobjed

Captain
I think...

This is the first time in history that a Nuclear armed state invaded another Nuclear armed state.

Ukraine have more than 12K nuclear warheads and 25K IRBMs; that is by no means a push over.

No it doesn't; it gave them up 20 years ago. A quick Google search should tell you everything you need to know.
 

Franklin

Captain
New twist to this crisis the Crimean parliament has voted to join Russia and there will be a referendum 16 march. I wonder how the West is going to respond to this.

Ukraine crisis: Crimea MPs vote to join Russia

MPs in the southern Ukrainian region of Crimea have voted to formally become part of the Russian Federation.

Parliament said the decision would be put to the Crimean people for their verdict in a referendum on 16 March.

A government minister in Kiev said they believe it would be unconstitutional for Crimea to join Russia.

Crimea, a region whose population is mostly ethnic Russian, has been at the centre of tensions following the fall of Ukraine's pro-Moscow president.

Pro-Russian and Russian forces have been in de facto control of the peninsula, which already enjoys a degree of autonomy from Kiev, for several days.

The announcement from Crimea's parliament comes as EU leaders are meeting in Brussels to discuss how to respond to Russia's troop deployment on Ukrainian soil.

The Crimean parliament resolved "to enter into the Russian Federation with the rights of a subject of the Russian Federation".

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian media that President Vladimir Putin had been informed of the Crimean vote.

Crimea

Autonomous republic within Ukraine
Transferred from Russia in 1954
Ethnic Russians - 58.5%*
Ethnic Ukrainians - 24.4%*
Crimean Tatars - 12.1%*
Source: Ukraine census 2001

Sources in the Crimean parliament have told the BBC they are now waiting for a response from Moscow to their request for Crimea to become a part of Russia.

According to the decree published on the Crimean parliament's website, citizens will be asked in the referendum whether they are in favour of reuniting the region with Russia "as a subject of the Russian Federation" or "retaining the status of Crimea as part of Ukraine".

Ukraine's interim Economy Minister Pavlo Sheremeta, speaking in Kiev soon after the announcement was made, said: "We're not working out what to do if Crimea joins the Russian Federation because we believe it's unconstitutional."

The move by Crimea's parliament will significantly increase tensions as Western diplomats try to draw political leaders in Ukraine and Russia into negotiations to prevent a full Russian invasion of Ukraine, the BBC's Richard Galpin reports from Moscow.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

delft

Brigadier
New twist to this crisis the Crimean parliament has voted to join Russia and there will be a referendum 16 march. I wonder how the West is going to respond to this.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Simple. It will be called invalid. Just like the election victory of Hamas in the last Palestinian elections.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Simple. It will be called invalid. Just like the election victory of Hamas in the last Palestinian elections.

That is of course what will happen.
It does come at a cost however and I think with the Urmas Paet tape, we are starting to see what that means.

The Ukraine like Estonia and the rest of the Accession countries are all former members of the same club. Behind the "Wall of Sound" Propaganda Machine, there will be a lot of concern in these countries that.a Democratically Elected President can be removed by a foreign backed/orchestrated mob, despite having just negotiated a political settlement, generous to the opposition and all done because the President took a perfectly legitimate decision, that others inside and outside the county, did not like.

I think many of these countries will; at least in private, be very concerned by the what's, hows and whys of all this and wonder if such a fate could befall them if; for instance, they developed a reluctance to place Missile Defence system components on their territory?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top