Mysterre
Banned Idiot
Who said it would have to try and pick up any submarine tracks? You should read it again carefully: the 056's purpose in that scenario is to drive a submarine into a trap, not necessarily to localize a sub's coordinates for the purpose of attack. Also, "bang" is a word you are taking literally which in practice doesn't happen regardless and therefore has no reason to be nitpicked about. In this case "banging" a sonar signifies the intent of the action rather than what actually comes out of the sonar emitter.First I don’t think a few Type 056s can just “bang” away and wait for an active sonar to pick up a submarine, that simply just doesn’t happen, because when using active sonar you also get lots of background noise, your signal to noise ratio is critical, are you aware of the underwater features and landmarks, can you tell when you over deep canyons etc etc , and it takes a very talent operator to recognise what he is looking at
Clearly that is not true in all circumstances, most especially if your own H-K submarine is significantly inferior to your prey, such as is the case with USN and PLAN submarines. In this case it would be like a wolf hunting a tiger: stupid, dead wolf; full, happy tiger.The best and only way to submarine hunt is to deploy your own hunter killer submarine
There are other solutions that are far superior to an ASW helicopter using dipping sonar or sonobuoys for the detection of submarines, namely fixed wing ASW planes and SURTASS/LFA sonar ships. In the case of sonar ships, they would certainly be part of a surface fleet in wartime and would be able to utilize the fleet's armament if a sub were detected. Also, many subs carry air defense missiles, so the disadvantage is not always with the sub. If the sub captain feels that detection and subsequent attack is imminent, he may very well just take that helo out.failing that there are one other solution, that is ASW helicopter, and that’s where the Z9C comes in, Pakistan Navy has acquired this type and it is a pretty good helo for searching for submarines with relatively good sensors, if nothing else any SSNs nightmare is when a ASW helo is detected, then all the disadvantage lie with the submarine, the helo can either engage or rely the info to a surface ship which can then attack
Did someone argue that UAV's cannot be used for ASW?And lastly a UAV can be used for ASW, when your only Z9C comes into re-fuel, or re-arm or new crews take over you lose your greatest ASW asset for that period of time, that’s when a rotor blade UAV or UACV can take over keeping eyes and hears in the water, it does not mean it will necessarily be an attack platform
Yeah, in the same way a BB gun is good enough asset for boar hunting. After all, you COULD kill a boar with a BB gun.the fact that Type 056 even has a helo platform is good enough asset for ASW, obviously depending on what helo it will carry
I hear what you are saying, but my point is that in order for the 056 to have any real use as part of a networked ASW operation it needs to have some capability to either detect or attack a submarine at long range, if not both. In other words, it would either be a remoting sensing platform to help designate targets for other ASW platforms, or it would be a mini-arsenal ship to help provide firepower for remote sensing platforms. Since it lacks both a long range sensor and a long range weapon, its usefulness to an ASW operation is extremely limited. As a remote sensing platform, a 056 armed with a TAS would have to be closely paired with a ship that can prosecute an immediate attack on a track. Well why not just put a TAS on that ship in the first place (assuming it didn't have one already)? Add to that the fact that the 056 is not designed to keep up with a blue water fleet and your options for offboard weapons launchers decreases dramatically. As for mini-arsenal ships, a Type 022 loaded with 8 CY-X missiles would be a far more potent (and cheaper) mini-arsenal ship for littoral ASW, though I should note again that rocket-boosted torpedoes don't have nearly the reach of a torpedo-armed helicopter. Pairing a 056 stringing TAS with a 022 carrying CY-X missiles is a possibility that sounds more like a Rube Goldberg contraption than a viable solution to ASW.the general point I am really trying to make here is that the 056 is hardly ever going to be operating in areas and under conditions, where; as a platform, it is on its own. I have always seen it as a piece in the network and to be honest, the pawns of this chess board.
I hoped I had made clear that it would always be working in conjunction with other more sophisticated platforms, which will provide better situation awareness and execute the final coup de grace. My basic point is that a ship of this type could participate is something like ASW in China's littorals without itself needing to be outfitted with the latest and best detection systems or weapons.
The scenario of my previous post was one where the general position of a sub was known and something big and nasty was moving in to finish it off. The 056's were there to shrink the Ocean and cause distraction and uncertainly. In a similar vein I was not thinking of a UACV with sonar bouys, but something potentially fatal it could drop onto a known target, detected and designated by a larger and more capable ship etc etc. I could believe that such a ship could be used as bait if there were other platforms staying silent or above the water, able to give them support.
I have no doubt that the low cost "dumb terminal" approach is the one that best describes the envisaged operations doctrine of the class of ship and I am just trying to illustrate what that could mean. If a specific illustration is not feasible, it just means that the PLAN would not try and do it that particular way.
But then this all gets back to my whole point about us fanboys asking this ship to do more than its designers intended for it to do.