055 DDG Large Destroyer Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

FarkTypeSoldier

Junior Member
I don't think conflicts and hypothetical war scenarios are flesible in this thread.

Some if you provided good insights and analysis which are valuable and professional, but limited talks are ok but try to stay tune back to the main topic.

Thanks.
 

by78

General
Some clearer view of the test apparatus. All are 1280x960.

The main integrated mast is still unfinished, but maybe some extrapolations can be made about its final size and geometry.

13990667833_b5ab9259c4_o.jpg


13970684995_89ec3cd2fe_o.jpg


13970685565_80e5a18628_o.jpg


13967502941_6b034f907b_o.jpg


13967507212_3e8abd86fb_o.jpg


13947585606_631f0fa9d4_o.jpg
 
Last edited:

JayBird

Junior Member
By the previous pics it looks almost as big as the carrier mockup.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

With these new pics posted today, it looks like the 055 might look more like the model posted by AssassinsMace here instead of the DDG-1000 style type of DDG. The bridge windows match this two pics more.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
With these new pics posted today, it looks like the 055 might look more like the model posted by AssassinsMace here instead of the DDG-1000 style type of DDG. The bridge windows match this two pics more.

I'm not warship designer but I don't think that's ideal location for the the CIWS especially on the middle sketch..
 

Solaris

Banned Idiot
It seems possible that the main radar panels will not be in the 'traditional' locations right under the bridge. At the base of the main mast seems to be a possibility but those areas look rectangular rather than square-shaped, and with less surface area. But I do detect what looks like an Arleigh Burke IIA 'panel hump' where the rearward-facing panels are elevated above the forward-facing panels and raised above the level of the bridge.

I'd like to see a UAV hangar and 1 or even 2 UUV garages on the 055, a la USS Momsen. I don't think either of these are out of reach for the PLAN and both have good utility on especially a larger warship that can afford the space. I also like an X/L-band radar combo; X-band so that the ship can use SARH instead of or in addition to ARH for missile guidance, and L-band so that stealth performance is improved compared to S- and X-band, but not so indiscriminant in target location like UHF and VHF that the radar is more "early warning" and less "volume search". "Early warning" sounds almost like a pejorative when used to describe radars. Kind of like "regime" when used by Western journalists to describe some countries' governments. In terms of software, something like a PLAN version of the USN's Cooperative Engagement Capability would be one of the biggest force multipliers the PLAN could achieve. In terms of ordinance, the only one that would really make the 055 shine would be a SAM like an HHQ-9X with multi-mode radar engagement capability and SARH/ARH guiance, IR sensor, and passive home-on-jam. Is this too much to ask??? lol
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Bit of a half baked job, it doesn't even have the rumoured L band radar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top