055 DDG Large Destroyer Thread

[latenlazy]

I don't worry about what you base your own behavior on, and neither should you worry about what I base my behavior on.

Then perhaps you shouldn't be telling me to worry about my behavior .

 

[kwaigonegin]

Bro, I think you would agree calling someone delicate tulips is quite patronizing unless you know them well and uses it in an endearing or joking manner.
Perhaps we should all refrain for equating someone's personality to flowers .
A simple, I respectfully disagree with your conclusion would suffice.

As a general rule of thumb don't use words or terms that you wouldn't normally use in person and since most of us have never met each other in person, the question is would you use them on a stranger you just met?

 

[Iron Man]

I would if someone exhibited the signs of delicateness, such as if someone easily sensed non-existent slights or referred to other people as asses, etc.

 

[Iron Man]

ANYWAYS, getting back on topic, I drew up some speculative 4x GT arrangements for the 055 recently:

COGAG:


COGLAG:


IEP:

 

[latenlazy]

I would if someone exhibited the signs of delicateness, such as if someone easily sensed non-existent slights or referred to other people as asses, etc.

Maybe you should focus on the topic and not on characterizing people.

 

[Richard Santos]

Uhem. There is a destroyer somewhere. People call it type 055. Ever heard of it?

 

[Jura The idiot]

ANYWAYS, getting back on topic, I drew up some speculative 4x GT arrangements for the 055 recently:

COGAG:
View attachment 36764

COGLAG:
View attachment 36762

IEP:
View attachment 36763

humor me with numbers

(I mean in the three configurations and assuming QC280, what would be BHP; electric power available; sustained speed of the ship and so on)

 

[FORBIN]

Bro, I think you would agree calling someone delicate tulips is quite patronizing unless you know them well and uses it in an endearing or joking manner.
Perhaps we should all refrain for equating someone's personality to flowers .
A simple, I respectfully disagree with your conclusion would suffice.

As a general rule of thumb don't use words or terms that you wouldn't normally use in person and since most of us have never met each other in person, the question is would you use them on a stranger you just met?

In adddition and mainly we correspond in writing and it is completely different.
And actualy hot ! never see since 4 years and always same guys who are multiple repeat offenders, their motivations politic, chauvinism, bias up to hatred etc...

 

[jacksprat]

In adddition and mainly we correspond in writing and it is completely different.
And actualy hot ! never see since 4 years and always same guys who are multiple repeat offenders, their motivations politic, chauvinism, bias up to hatred etc...

Once again I would ask, where the hell are the mods, this is getting very tiresome.

 

[Iron Man]

humor me with numbers

(I mean in the three configurations and assuming QC280, what would be BHP; electric power available; sustained speed of the ship and so on)

There is no way to answer this question because we do not have information on the efficiency of conversion from mechanical power to electrical power, transmission loss, efficiency of the hypothetical electric motor, or even the power output of the various elements. The QC-280's nominal power output is 28MW, but I read somewhere it is closer to 23MW in practice. The 052D has 2 4.9MW diesel generators in addition to their diesel engines, so maybe the 055 has 3 or 4 of them. Or maybe the 055 uses a larger diesel in smaller numbers.