Re: DDG 052C Thread
Easy.
HHQ-9 -> HQ-9 -> Patriot and S-300.
Patriot uses phase array and the access channel was probably from the Israelis, something the Americans have accused the Israelis. The S-300 also uses phase array.
The Kvant AESA is very far from an AEGIS, MPQ-53, Flap Lid or Tombstone. Its more akin to what the Israelis called their 'Green Pine'.
The 052C radar similarity to AEGIS is only very superficial (the external use of four faced phase arrays on the superstructure). Technically that means nothing about the way the radars operate except that it has sensor and data fusion and a full 360 degree stationary coverage.
If the Ukrainians contributed to HQ-9 and HHQ-9 technologies, the technologies would have to be S-300 related, not Kvant related. If Kvant technologies are taught to the Chinese, the end product is more likely something closer to Green Pine.
If the Kvant connection is minimal, then what is the 052C radar technology based from? I really have hard time too see how PLAN able to pull off a phased-array radar comparable to the Aegis system without receiving any outside assistance.
Easy.
HHQ-9 -> HQ-9 -> Patriot and S-300.
Patriot uses phase array and the access channel was probably from the Israelis, something the Americans have accused the Israelis. The S-300 also uses phase array.
The Kvant AESA is very far from an AEGIS, MPQ-53, Flap Lid or Tombstone. Its more akin to what the Israelis called their 'Green Pine'.
The 052C radar similarity to AEGIS is only very superficial (the external use of four faced phase arrays on the superstructure). Technically that means nothing about the way the radars operate except that it has sensor and data fusion and a full 360 degree stationary coverage.
If the Ukrainians contributed to HQ-9 and HHQ-9 technologies, the technologies would have to be S-300 related, not Kvant related. If Kvant technologies are taught to the Chinese, the end product is more likely something closer to Green Pine.