The War in the Ukraine

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
During the Russian withdrawal from kherson, a lot of twitter posts showed a massacre of Russian retreating forces and a rout.

Any hard evidence come out of that at all? Many were touting evidence with dark images of artillery battles and the aftermath would be the end of the war and have Putin overthrown. What came of that? Just curious.
Probably nothing. Haven't seen anything bad happening to the withdrawing Russian troops, which mind you, is imo proof enough that there was probably a Russia-Ukraine backroom agreement
 

SolarWarden

Junior Member
Registered Member
Romania's transition from Mig's to F-16's can give us glimpse of how Ukraine may fare in this theoretical transition:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Here is the key part:
Romanian Air Force pilot Capt. Alexandru Beraczko, 28, is one of two Romanians now in basic combat flight training in Arizona. He previously participated in U.S. Air Force programs at Lackland and Randolph Air Force Bases, Texas, Columbus Air Force Base, Miss., and Vance Air Force Base, Okla.

“I’ve been trained in the mindset to fly the MiG-21 before,” said Beraczko of his Romanian Alpha Jet training, which has the same avionics as the MiG-21. He’s also familiar with the MiG-29 flown by Ukraine.

“Getting [to] the F-16 from the MiG-29—it’s a way different airframe,” Beraczko told Air Force Magazine by phone from Tucson. “The heads-up display, even the missiles they are running, they have different cool times, different intelligence. Bear in mind they need to apply different tactics. Air tactics are different.”

Romania joined the NATO Partnership for Peace in 1994 shortly after independence and became a full NATO member 10 years later. Each step was a shift to the Western way of warfare.

From trained pilots and maintainers to required infrastructure to a boneyard of spare aircraft, Romania has been working on its transition to the F-16 for nearly a decade.

Even we struggle at this point, and we started enhancing and getting the F-16 like seven or eight years ago, and we’re still not yet there,” Beraczko said. “We are so close; we are wanting and willing to be there as personnel, as maintenance, as even a force.

A U.S. Air Force spokesperson said foreign countries seeking to train fighter pilots in the United States would typically begin with a few weeks in the T-6 trainer aircraft before spending a few months flying the faster T-38. Once the training is complete, the pilot can enroll in the basic course for combat pilots.

The majority of the course uses the F-16C model, since most pilots will be flying single-seat aircraft when they return home.

Graduating students reach a wingman level and are expected to continue flying with close supervision for 500 hours.



You have to remember that there are many variables involved in regards to transitioning from one platform to another. Repair crew, maintenance infrastructure, and etc are all part of the pilot's kill chain.
Well it would take three months to train Ukraine pilots to fly F-15s and F-16s at a basic level


The Biden administration has remained wary of allowing sensitive U.S. technology to fall into Russian hands on the battlefield and has worried about Moscow’s response should Ukrainian forces use high-end American equipment to attack Russian territory. But Kinzinger said the Ukrainians can be trusted with the equipment.

“They’ve been clear — and they’ve shown this with the weapons they have — they’re not trying to start a war with Russia inside of Russia,” said Kinzinger. “They just want to defend their homeland.”

He noted the United States is ready to start training Ukrainian pilots at Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi and possibly in Texas as well. It would take about three months to train the pilots to fly the F-15s and F-16s at a basic level.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So getting Ukraine pilots in F-16s somewhat close to NATO counterpart standards would likely take a year. This would be a crash course in a time of war where time is of the essence unlike Romania. A year training may be good enough for a conflict with Russia. It's not like they are having air battles. Just how good are Ukrainian Mig-29 pilots in air to air? How many hours do they have?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
A ceasefire like you describe would be useful for Russia but it would be useful for Ukraine as well, perhaps even more useful. It would allow NATO to arm Ukraine to a much higher degree and transition Ukraine's air force to Western jets. It wouldn't be escalatory then since "the war is over." The West (at least the elite) is willing to pour endless sums of money into Ukraine, especially since it's seen as successfully stopping Russia.

Russia's going to have to find a way to do the military reform and modernization you describe while engaged in combat in Ukraine. The way to do this is to completely destroy the Ukrainian state's ability to function by attacking not just electricity and water, but food storage and distribution as well. It won't matter how many millions of Ukrainians Zelensky is willing to march to their deaths if they're too hungry to march.

Firstly, the cracks are already showing in how much NATO nations are willing and able to maintain current levels of support to Ukraine when they can easily silence domestic opposition voices as Russian useful idiots and blame all their incompetence on Putin. That will be far harder to do with Russia unilaterally declaring an end of combat operations. Sure NATO will continue to support Ukraine, but what they can provide will be far less than what they can now.

Secondly, Ukraine rebuilding its airforce with NATO supplied planes isn’t going to have remotely as much of an impact as you seem to think unless they get F35s, which they won’t.

F15s, F16s, Typhoons and Rafales are basically what the VKS spent the lion share of its funds to counter. Even if the VKS is a paper tiger, Russia still has its formidable ground based AD networks. If soviet era AD can keep the modern VKS at bay, modern Russian AD will have little trouble keeping legacy western fighters at bay.

With reduced NATO support, even if Ukraine wants to keep fighting, it’s ability to do so will be far reduced and little challenge for Russia.

Also, it’s worth noting that Russia is not banking on being able to just stop all fighting. That’s why they did their partial mobilisation - so they can safely rotate their best troops back for modernisation without risk major battlefield defeats. It’s also why they are giving up Kherson, so they can consolidate behind good natural defensive barriers rather than having to try to hold a really bad position.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Probably nothing. Haven't seen anything bad happening to the withdrawing Russian troops, which mind you, is imo proof enough that there was probably a Russia-Ukraine backroom agreement

Noteworthy mention is the speed that they withdraw at. It took them around 3 days to move 20,000-30,000 troops and 3,000-5,000 pieces of equipment (depending on source) across the river. Reuters reported that it was estimated to take at least a week or more for the Russians to fully leave.

The top U.S. general said on Wednesday he estimated that Russia had 20,000-30,000 troops to move across the river, and the pullout could take "days and perhaps even weeks".

Ukraine's defence minister told Reuters in an interview on Thursday he expected the withdrawal to take at least a week.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This should highlight that Russian logistics isn’t as degraded and poor as some users here keep insisting upon.
 

BlackWindMnt

Major
Registered Member
Probably nothing. Haven't seen anything bad happening to the withdrawing Russian troops, which mind you, is imo proof enough that there was probably a Russia-Ukraine backroom agreement
Adding to this i just saw that Russian fertilisers are getting the go sign to be moved from Dutch harbours to be shipped to African nations. That looks like one more sign of some sort of back room agreement. Or it's just coincidental that it happened.

Edit:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
Well it would take three months to train Ukraine pilots to fly F-15s and F-16s at a basic level


The Biden administration has remained wary of allowing sensitive U.S. technology to fall into Russian hands on the battlefield and has worried about Moscow’s response should Ukrainian forces use high-end American equipment to attack Russian territory. But Kinzinger said the Ukrainians can be trusted with the equipment.

“They’ve been clear — and they’ve shown this with the weapons they have — they’re not trying to start a war with Russia inside of Russia,” said Kinzinger. “They just want to defend their homeland.”

He noted the United States is ready to start training Ukrainian pilots at Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi and possibly in Texas as well. It would take about three months to train the pilots to fly the F-15s and F-16s at a basic level.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So getting Ukraine pilots in F-16s somewhat close to NATO counterpart standards would likely take a year. This would be a crash course in a time of war where time is of the essence unlike Romania. A year training may be good enough for a conflict with Russia. It's not like they are having air battles. Just how good are Ukrainian Mig-29 pilots in air to air? How many hours do they have?
You avoided the other points about the logistical operations. Aircraft are maintenance heavy and require specialized equipment, well trained specialists, and maintenance/repair centers. Unless NATO has been covertly establishing such stations, provided such equipment, and trained a lot of personal to perform repairs and maintenance for the past few months at minimum, those hypothetical F-16's are useless. You have to remember that pilots are only part of the kill chain, which is extremely long. As for the pilots themselves, according to the Romanians, it is difficult and time consuming for them to learn how to operate F-16's and incorporate them into the air force. All of that is happening during peacetime. Ukrainian pilots are most likely on the alert for any requests for sorties, interceptions, and etc. They may not be flying a lot. However, they are still on high alert. So many of them definitely can't train.
 
Last edited:

tabu

Junior Member
Registered Member
No, it suggests Russia successfully held them at bay.

I've felt since the very beginning of this war that the Dnieper forms the natural boundary of the territory Russia will take. Since Kherson is on the wrong side of it, I don't feel this is too much of a setback - the far bigger problem was the collapse of the northern front and the loss of Kharkov. I think Russia needs to accomplish three objectives:

1) Begin another cycle of mobilization after the 300,000 are sent in and retake territory in the north and east.
2) Keep up attacks on critical infrastructure - completely dismantle the Ukrainian electricity grid, water supply, sanitation, etc.
3) Degrade Ukraine's air defenses sufficiently to allow the VKS air superiority over Ukraine so (2) can be accomplished much more effectively.

Only once these objectives are met can Russia begin to think about crossing the Dnieper.
No.
No. Initially it was only necessary to take the right bank, for the purpose of a land corridor to the Crimea and water to the Crimean canal. There was no need to go north of the horizontal line between Zaporizhzhia and Bakhmut.
But greed has killed the thief.
The corridor in its present configuration is not viable and can only exist if Ukraine agrees. It is essentially a gut just over 100 km wide and with difficult supplies on both sides.
A stable option could have been the capture of Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Mykolaiv and Odessa oblasts, but they did not make it, and there are no more forces to solve this problem.
The destruction of infrastructure would cause additional arms shipments, the west does not need millions more refugees. Russia is incapable of suppressing the air force, there is no means.
Russia can only think of continuing to stand on the Ugra, hoping that Ukraine and the West will succumb to the blackmail in the short term. If not, Russia has no chance of holding out..
 
Top