Its not a surprise. Electric car is easier to develop than ICE car. I dare to bet on them to deliver great E Autonomous Car than that company name Evergrande.Strange, maybe a crossover marketing deal? It seems they have partnered with SERES
Dunno
Its not a surprise. Electric car is easier to develop than ICE car. I dare to bet on them to deliver great E Autonomous Car than that company name Evergrande.Strange, maybe a crossover marketing deal? It seems they have partnered with SERES
Dunno
Evergrande developing an EV is a joke. That the Chinese Gov allow this heavily indebted and incompetent company to expand into the EV sector is indefensible.Its not a surprise. Electric car is easier to develop than ICE car. I dare to bet on them to deliver great E Autonomous Car than that company name Evergrande.
Selling car subsystems like Bosch. Good news is usually cars' OS and multimedia system sucks big time compared to smartphone. So big opportunity for Huawei here.Huawei said they don't sell car but my local news report they are selling car.
Look at you making up stories. Go reread the moderation. If the mod gave me a warning, then he warned your entire thread to stop posting trash against the CCP... and then he shut it down.I point out to mod because you engage in personal attack and slandering. Mod already gave you a warning not engage in such way.
No more than any other Chinese family. The future of all Chinese is connected to the CCP.Your family connected with the CCP?
Well, because as soon as you criticize the CCP, you are wrong, so I point out the invalidity of your accusations of what is only human imperfection yet real world excellence as compared to peers, as "weakness" and I also compare it to your own actions and history, which can be correctly deemed as weakness and incompetence.Plenty of semiconductor discussion you won't engage but as soon as pointing the Chinese government weakness you immediately jump like grasshopper.
This is future tense. You are criticizing them for something you think in the future? We will see how they handle TSMC's challenge when China's domestic lines are capable of supplying China's needs.If Chinese government' choose not to do anything regarding to this TSMC scheme to protect domestic players then it's plain incompetent. No rocket science.
You guess wrong on everything. I spoke up because I see such an imbalance. A person reported his own thread, then got it locked up, then complains that a trouble-maker got it locked up! Such an efficient way of doing things, and this person calls the CCP, the most competent government in the world, incompetent? It's like an egg calling an anvil frail! So ironically funny!I guess your feeling got hurted Everytime because CCP or Chinese government got criticized.
Is that true? Show the evidence. This is using ASML instead of SMEE so the importance is far less. Is the 28nm chip of useable/competitive quality? Post the whole story because as I am led to believe, SMIC capacity is overfilled and on all of the newer nodes, it is in low quantity trial production. If a certain node isn't selling, it's got some serious problems.BS. SMIC 28nm production capacity is not even fully filled up.
Show me your evidence. If TSMC put SMIC out of business, then why is it still in business? Are you exaggerating a small ruling?Previously, TSMC almost put SMIC out of business in a lawsuit and Chinese government stayed on side line , didn't step up to protect its own player. Stunning job indeed.
So which government "did its job" and has 100% indigenous fully operational line? All countries rely on ASML; China is the only one making an effort and a very credible effort, to create a competitor, and you say that the CCP didn't do its job because this competitor didn't rise long ago? Case in point of what I said regarding your unfounded criticisms.If Chinese government did its job , Chinese industry would have at least 100% Indeginous tech fully operational at 45nm by now.
You need to do some homework since you have some many things unsure and love to argue just for the sake of arguing and waste people's time.Look at you making up stories. Go reread the moderation. If the mod gave me a warning, then he warned your entire thread to stop posting trash against the CCP... and then he shut it down.
No more than any other Chinese family. The future of all Chinese is connected to the CCP.
Well, because as soon as you criticize the CCP, you are wrong, so I point out the invalidity of your accusations of what is only human imperfection yet real world excellence as compared to peers, as "weakness" and I also compare it to your own actions and history, which can be correctly deemed as weakness and incompetence.
This is future tense. You are criticizing them for something you think in the future? We will see how they handle TSMC's challenge when China's domestic lines are capable of supplying China's needs.
You guess wrong on everything. I spoke up because I see such an imbalance. A person reported his own thread, then got it locked up, then complains that a trouble-maker got it locked up! Such an efficient way of doing things, and this person calls the CCP, the most competent government in the world, incompetent? It's like an egg calling an anvil frail! So ironically funny!
Is that true? Show the evidence. This is using ASML instead of SMEE so the importance is far less. Is the 28nm chip of useable/competitive quality? Post the whole story because as I am led to believe, SMIC capacity is overfilled and on all of the newer nodes, it is in low quantity trial production. If a certain node isn't selling, it's got some serious problems.
Show me your evidence. If TSMC put SMIC out of business, then why is it still in business? Are you exaggerating a small ruling?
How old was this? Before the tech war when China had to maintain a visage of fairness, or after?
So which government "did its job" and has 100% indigenous fully operational line? All countries rely on ASML; China is the only one making an effort and a very credible effort, to create a competitor, and you say that the CCP didn't do its job because this competitor didn't rise long ago? Case in point of what I said regarding your unfounded criticisms.
That is your new version of "I'm not showing you any evidence because that's what you want me to do."?You need to do some homework since you have some many things unsure. Once you done those homeworks, many of the questions you asked will be answered by yourself
Not accepted. Evidence for your claims is accepted if you have any.I give you some hint on your questions.
Because that's off topic and stupid.Why don't you do a survey to ask Chinese in this forum if they feel hurted if CCP criticized?
Does the forum allow multiple accounts?Does the forum allows person attack?
If you don't know, go do research. My screen name isn't Google.Why did Richard Chang left SMIC?
When will TSMC 28nm production come online?
When did smee 90nm lithography came out?
Refusing to do homeworks?That is your new version of "I'm not showing you any evidence because that's what you want me to do."?
Go do your homework. Once you've done it, you'll know how worthless your criticisms of the CCP are.
Not accepted. Evidence for your claims is accepted if you have any.
Because that's off topic and stupid.
Does the forum allow multiple accounts?
If you don't know, go do research. My screen name isn't Google.
That would summarize your entire complaint against the CCP.Refusing to do homeworks?
Nonsensical tripe of an answer from someone who can't debate or show evidence for his claims.Ok fine , give some tech insights for audience like voyager1 , horse, ansys1968, and others so they can learn something from you?
You got to show your worthiness not just a street fighter.
If others ask me the same questions I would gladly answer.Nonsensical tripe of an answer from someone who can't debate or show evidence for his claims.
I've got more credibility on this site than all of your old accounts put together. Check my like and post count.Because you are not credible person.
At least I don't give wrong insight and criticism like you. And I don't proudly repeat obvious junk "insight" about TSMC trying to do in China what every company wishes to do to its rivals as if I cracked some enemy wartime code. That you repeatedly parrot this as if it were some crown gem analysis shows how shallow your knowledge and abilities really are.Not a regular contributor and give valuable insights
What do you want, an application and formal intent signed? Suddenly coming to debate is how it works on an online forum.Now all of sudden you jump out of blue to argue.
Like every time you call "incompetent" a government that has achieved more than any other peer in the world.Pretty much waste of people's time.
Which one? The one of your multiple bans or the one where you repeatedly squealed that you were raped by Deino?Track record speaks for itself.
Reread my first and second line of this response.Your track record for contribution of valuable insights is non-existent.