Miscellaneous News

proelite

proelite

Senior Member
supersnoop said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Whole thing sounds like nonsense. 5G is not an American technology.



Just factually wrong…
Click to expand...

If this article is true the most troubling aspect for the US is that their officials are completely clueless about the technology they're supposed to police, which means the article is probably true.

When China's domestic EUV machines reach volume production and the first evidence of that is sub-5nm chips, it's ASML gonna be in big trouble with daddy SAM because no way the Chinese have the technology to make 3nm chips? lol
 
I

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
proelite said:
If this article is true the most troubling aspect for the US is that their officials are completely clueless about the technology they're supposed to police, which means the article is probably true.

When China's domestic EUV machines reach volume production and the first evidence of that is sub-5nm chips, it's ASML gonna be in big trouble with daddy SAM because no way the Chinese have the technology to make 3nm chips? lol
Click to expand...
US going after ASML after China develops EUV would be win-win.
China always finds win-win solutions, and it sometimes means China wins twice.
 
FriedButter

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
supersnoop said:
So sick of hearing this nonsense.
TSMC equipment is not some magic bullet. Most of TSMC’s expertise is human, not equipment. Samsung and Intel have access to the exact same equipment and neither have captured the same market share as TSMC.
Even if an EUV equipment is captured, who would service it?
This is just typical US media talking points for the stupid masses
Click to expand...

It becomes a domestic political issue. Just like the nonsense in Ukraine and the irrational decisions being made there for PR. For China, the status of TSMC isn’t going to matter for them. However, the US for political reasons cannot accept China taking even a single concrete brick from a wall. The ruling politicians and military leaders will get crucified by their opportunistic political opposition and general public.
 
S

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
GZDRefugee said:
I mean I would defect for 5 Xibucks. But that's just me.
Click to expand...
Liang Mong Song got a lot more than 5 Xibucks...

proelite said:
If this article is true the most troubling aspect for the US is that their officials are completely clueless about the technology they're supposed to police, which means the article is probably true.

When China's domestic EUV machines reach volume production and the first evidence of that is sub-5nm chips, it's ASML gonna be in big trouble with daddy SAM because no way the Chinese have the technology to make 3nm chips? lol
Click to expand...
What do you expect from a government full of Liberal Arts majors and Lawyers?

FriedButter said:
It becomes a domestic political issue. Just like the nonsense in Ukraine and the irrational decisions being made there for PR. For China, the status of TSMC isn’t going to matter for them. However, the US for political reasons cannot accept China taking even a single concrete brick from a wall. The ruling politicians and military leaders will get crucified by their opportunistic political opposition and general public.
Click to expand...
Yes, but I would hope that SDF readers know a bit better, it's not even worth discussing here. It's so exceedingly stupid. Like why would China have a plan to take over Taiwan for EUV technology instead of, you know, just having a plan to develop EUV technology?
 
coolgod

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
proelite said:
In my opinion, China got a stepping stone toward a full border agreement.
Click to expand...
I took a look at Indian social media, many don't seem happy cause they think if China gave concessions, that means China must have stolen more Indian land previously. What would a full border agreement achieve? China and India previously had border agreements before, didn't stop Indians from playing with fire along the border.

India won't change its anti-China strategy regardless of the border since it believes it can gain more from the US antagonizing China.
 
proelite

proelite

Senior Member
coolgod said:
I took a look at Indian social media, many don't seem happy cause they think if China gave concessions, that means China must have stolen more Indian land previously. What would a full border agreement achieve? China and India previously had border agreements before, didn't stop Indians from playing with fire along the border.

India won't change its anti-China strategy regardless of the border since it believes it can gain more from US cooperating against China.
Click to expand...

I was referring to border agreements like the Sino-Soviet and Sino-Vietnam border agreements. Once that's there, it's the end of border problems for good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top