Miscellaneous News

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
If the anglos are so committed to an anti China crusade, why don’t they throw down the gauntlet and let their own sons and daughters lead the way. A merchant slaver pirate nation like the five eyes lacks the cojones to pull off a Ghengis khan, and judging by chinas production of carriers, I sure hope conquest of the lands of the five eyes are on the cards. It’ll have to be like the Han campaign against eh Xiongnu, a multi decade intergenerational project to eradicate Anglo domination of the North American and Australian continents.


I think this is all idle talk.

The truth remains from the day the Berlin Wall fell, that NATO had no purpose anymore.

A few decades later, NATO is still looking for a purpose.

Oddly, this war in Europe gave NATO a purpose, supposedly.

Does not look like it will pan out that way.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
If the anglos are so committed to an anti China crusade, why don’t they throw down the gauntlet and let their own sons and daughters lead the way. A merchant slaver pirate nation like the five eyes lacks the cojones to pull off a Ghengis khan, and judging by chinas production of carriers, I sure hope conquest of the lands of the five eyes are on the cards. It’ll have to be like the Han campaign against eh Xiongnu, a multi decade intergenerational project to eradicate Anglo domination of the North American and Australian continents.
We can't get the North American continent anymore probably due to nukes. It's also not really needed.

China should focus on containing US to North America. Even if we can't do to the new Axis what Stalin did to the old Axis, we can still demilitarize them from military aged population. Create multiple proxy war fronts or even direct war if that's needed.

Not going after mainland US, but rather baiting US to throw human wave after wave until they lost all offensive capability, then after that China can hold the Pacific, while keeping the amerinazi imprisoned on mainland USA. They'll then destroy eachother among themselves for what scraps of power are left there.

The valuable parts of the former European Imperial powers are actually the colonies. It's those which China should exercise economic and military conquest over. While leaving the former colonizers imprisoned in their own homeland, where China will control the inflow of food, civilian goods and infrastructure needed to sustain modern life. Austerity will then be measured out as needed to former nazist or imperialist powers, depending on how civilized their conduct is.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is an odd story I saw this morning on cable news. My brain feels like exploding trying to figure out what these two authors are trying to say. They're peddling a book they wrote about how back during the Obama Administration, the Pentagon decided to partner with Silicon Valley and formed "Unit X" to create technologies of the future and they claim the results are being seen in Ukraine today. For some weird reason, they're citing enemy tactics from Ukraine to Israel to the Red Sea as examples of how the battlefield has changed. The US side isn't the one that's victorious there. Are they trying to claim the technology used comes from "Unit X'? All the conflict zones where they claim "Unit X" technology is being used are examples where their side is failing. Where's the scandal that all this new advanced US technology is falling into the hands of the enemy? They're trying to blame China for somehow getting into the supply chain of Boeing blaming them for the bad quality airliners being produced there. But no word here...?

Not sure why one of the authors cites riding in an F-16 over the Iraq/ Iranian border didn't have a map so he didn't know which country he was flying over and then mentions something that cost a $100. Is this an example of this amazing technology of what...? Then one of them mentions commercial technology. They brought up drone warfare and how M1 tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine. DJI drone technology has been at the forefront of drones being used for these purposes. Are they claiming DJI is using "Unit X" technology?

It's suspicious. Nothing makes sense. When the authors talk in the interview, they don't sound natural. The entire piece seems scripted with bad actors playing the roles. Is this really for dumb Americans to see to say how the Pentagon and the US are doing a great job so Americans shouldn't use their votes to change anything? Naturally Americans are going to assume that these "battlefield changing technologies" came from the US because why else would they try to take credit for victories by the enemy against their own side?
It make sense if you have read about Syria. this type of explosive small size drone swarm done started from there. it was written that that was beyond the ability of commercial drones at the time. Russia influenced by those events in many ways that have delayed development of so many of its platforms and systems.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1720727210096.png
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Even if they make their own electric vehicles, they think they have the right to sell them in China while banning Chinese EVs from selling in their countries. They think they have a right to that absurdity just like the EU demanded Chinese EV technology to use in their EV industry while China got nothing in return.

There were some claims not too long ago that China is lying about its population size. They say it's really more like 600 million not 1.4 billion. Why would they care? Because they know the idea of selling to 1.4 billion people is very attractive for the world and that's been why countries today are hesitant to go against China because they want to make money selling to them. Just like the West lies about how badly China's economy is doing because they want to discourage anyone from investing into China, the same why they want to claim China is lying about its population size so that people don't find the Chinese market as attractive to them anymore.

Saudi Arabia has oil which is why someone like Hillary Clinton who anointed herself champion of women's right ignores abuses there. That's why Biden who wanted to turn Saudi Arabia into a pariah state did an instant about face and dropped any human rights concerns. Oil is a strategic resource that the world needs. Whoever controls the world oil supply is in control of the world. That's why the US bragging about being energy independent is irrelevant because they don't control all the countries that have oil to sell who they can sell or not sell to.

China's population is a strategic resource. And like oil, the US and the West want to control it so they can use the Chinese consumer to reward or punish other countries. Look at how the West is angry that China is buying Russian oil where they accuse is enough where the profits are funding their war in Ukraine. No Chinese market to sell to... no Ukraine war. The US and the West still have aspirations of seizing control of China because they certainly are not to going to negotiate with China because that would mean China gets something out of it. That tells you nothing will be done through mutual agreement. So the only thing left is they see themselves taking over China in order to reap the rewards afterwards. It's not like the Chinese people are like oil. They're going to violate human rights in order to take control because how else could they do it?
 
Top