No, Nazi Germany pre-war was sending Jews to Palestine, during war planned to send Jews to Madagascar. After losing air war and subsequent naval engagements, the plan was abandoned.No, the Nazi's did not want the Jewish people to flee to areas outside of their control. They wanted the total destruction of the Jewish people. What Israeli is doing is much closer to the actions of Imperial Japan than Nazi Germany.
The reason a line needs to be drawn is because the term, "genocide," has become a tool of the Western liberal media and justification by unscrupulous policymakers to conduct imperialism. Oh, the Serbs are conducting genocide, lets bomb them up and break up their nation. Oh, Russians are conducting genocide in Ukraine, lets sanction them to the stone age. Genocide is happening in Xinjiang, lets sanction a bunch of Chinese companies. Eroding the definition of terms is one of the primary strategies used by Western liberal media to create false equivalences and distort facts in order to propagate false narratives. The term genocide is used because it evokes in people's minds the horrors of Nazi death camps regardless of what is actually happening. People need to recognize, call out, and remember the hypocrisies spun up by the Western liberal media rather than to fall into their trap.
The Zionists in the US want people to waste their time arguing about whether or not what the Israelis are doing fit the definition of genocide. What needs to happen is that a united front be created to put an immediate stop to the atrocities, and for this moment of hypocrisy to be forever remembered.
This is not correct. At the start of Nazi rule, they promoted emigration and considered sending them to Africa.
The mass killings only started towards the end of the war.
No, Nazi Germany pre-war was sending Jews to Palestine, during war planned to send Jews to Madagascar. After losing air war and subsequent naval engagements, the plan was abandoned.
The intention of forcing a group to flee by definition is a contradiction with genocide.
Actually, forced expulsion/deportation/ethnic cleansing can be a contributing factor to genocide under certain circumstances.No, the Nazi's did not want the Jewish people to flee to areas outside of their control. They wanted the total destruction of the Jewish people. What Israeli is doing is much closer to the actions of Imperial Japan than Nazi Germany.
See page 4 of the following document:Forced expulsion is the principal act involved in the notion of ‘ethnic cleansing’ – a system
of acts conducted to cleanse an area of a group, often alongside other acts including
extermination, detainment and violence. In such a situation, international courts and
tribunals have recognised forced expulsion as a contributing factor to genocide.
Additionally, forced expulsion has been held to have evidentiary significance as it may
infer genocidal intent.
China needs to build a robust SOSUS system in the west Pacific Ocean, certainly within "the 1st and 2nd island chains".What is China's answer to the columbia class submarine? I know satellites can track anything above the sea level included the most stealthiest plane and ship. Since submarine are underwater, does china have very advanced radar to track these things?
No, the Nazi's did not want the Jewish people to flee to areas outside of their control. They wanted the total destruction of the Jewish people. What Israeli is doing is much closer to the actions of Imperial Japan than Nazi Germany.
When the western ruling class are petty enough to try to kneecap China's development just because they did it better, as they kneecapped Japan in the 80s and France with Alstom, is it any surprise that they would sue a member of the laity for a mean tweet?
That's exactly what happened in Gaza, as I stated previously. Ethnic cleansing transformed into genocide because Gazans refuse to leave.In that case I stand corrected. But at some point later in the war, their intentions changed to genocide. I don't think that change of intention has occurred in Israel yet,
You can't be serious. Yes they do!Mass graves does not equate genocide.
I know what your issue is. You will only believe it is genocide if the West accepts it as genocide. If the West refuses to accept it, you will also refuse. For example, the West doesn't accept the genocide of native Americans.Mass graves were perpetuated by multiple nations, on both sides, during WW2, yet only one state conducted genocide, despite at least 2 other states also having conducted war crimes and killings of civilians on a massive scale. Mass graves can be attributed to multiple sides during the Yugoslav wars, yet none of the parties intended to conduct genocide. The US left mass graves all over Korea/Japan, yet those actions do not constitute genocide.
No. If they left, it would be ethnic cleansing. But since they did not leave, the 'I kill you' process began which is textbook genocide."Leave or I will kill you," is textbook ethnic cleansing.