Miscellaneous News

badoc

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't know where the optimism in the forum two days ago about Taiwanese being the ones who want reunification came from, claiming that the DPP only has 40% support. But I have to point out that the three leading political parties in Taiwan are the same shit, green skin green heart, blue skin green heart, white skin green heart, no difference whatsoever.

The so called "Blue" KMT vice presidential candidate made it very clear that the KMT was born anti-communist, so how can such a party possibly unify China with the CPC?
And the period when the textbooks on Taiwan independence were most prevalent was during the time of Ma Ying-jeou who was so-called the best time to unify.

In the interview, "White" Ko P. admitted that he is always a deep green at heart. (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) So it is literally three pieces of green dog shits.


Of course can look at the structure of the votes, at the bottom, the support rate of the New Party (新党) and the United Frontier Party(统促党), which are willing to support unification, is only 0.42%. If we follow some people in the forums, then there are only 70% x 0.42% ≈ negligible number of people who support unification in Taiwan.
View attachment 123972


I don't even know what the Chinese Foreign Ministry took Nauru for. Prevent you from not knowing what this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is about. It's a standard Trump "Shithole Country" of digging up all bird shit and having nothing now but diplomatic statements and UN votes, also has a history of bouncing repeatedly between China and Taiwan. At present, more than 50 countries, including the United States, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Singapore, the Czech Republic, Australia and other countries' executive departments or congresses have congratulated Taiwan on the successful completion of the 16th presidential and vice presidential elections. And the Chinese Foreign Ministry in addition to protest is to buy a shithole country's support in my opinion is very negligent initiative. The money used to buy Nauru could have been used to punish those who had sent congratulatory messages to Taiwan. Otherwise, the so-called "one-China principle" would have been obliterated.



Some of the countries that sent congratulatory messages of support seem very normal to me, such as the United States and Japan, but the following countries surprised me. First is Singapore,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Secondly, Ukraine took the record for the fastest congratulatory message, just five minutes after Lai's election. Then Zelensky even wanted China to attend the peace summit! That's just crazy.
View attachment 123973

Oh, and this little Marcos from the Philippines, I don't even know if that counts as undermining the "One China Principle" or what count? When is the Chinese Foreign Ministry going to plug Filipino bananas and Filipino pineapples right into this idiot's ass so he can learn what the "One-China Principle" is all about?
View attachment 123971
Not surprising at all.
We even had extensive military training in Taiwan.
Most importantly, must have "One China" included.

Text from our congratulatory message.
"Singapore shares a close and longstanding friendship with Taiwan and the Taiwanese people, and will continue to grow this relationship based on our 'One China' policy."
.
 

4Runner

Senior Member
Registered Member
The US from the beginning to the end of the Cold War period basically silently knew that they had the USSR under control completely and that they would eventually win over time. Heck, the existence of the USSR even helped America become as productive as possible. USSR wasn't any kind of threat to them economically and technologically. It was like some kind of exercise partner to them, with positive influence even, albeit with nuclear powers.

......
That was not a fact in that piece of history. I guess we were watching different movies...

People around my age know how scared Americans were in 70s and 80s of USSR. Not always, not paranoid, but scared. That was the only instance in which the American public was scared of any other country on this planet. It was internal corruption and bad governance that brought down USSR form within. If it were for the Chinese, as long as the USSR was maintained, which was totally technically feasible, given the resources and the population and the eduction, USSR would always have been a super power, regardless of how US/NATO/EU have evolved. By the same token, China will always be a super power as long as China maintains its unity and independence. As I said a few times in this forum, there are only 3 real independent countries on this planet: China, Russia and US. None can destroy other(s). Collapse would only occur from within. Having been living in US for more than 30 years now, I can assure you that it was not US or any other country that brought down USSR per se. It was Russians themselves. On that note, I actually don't have much sympathy for the Russians on almost any subject. I am just trying to state the facts as far as US-China war is concerned.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
That was not a fact in that piece of history. I guess we were watching different movies...

People around my age know how scared Americans were in 70s and 80s of USSR. Not always, not paranoid, but scared. That was the only instance in which the American public was scared of any other country on this planet. It was internal corruption and bad governance that brought down USSR form within. If it were for the Chinese, as long as the USSR was maintained, which was totally technically feasible, given the resources and the population and the eduction, USSR would always have been a super power, regardless of how US/NATO/EU have evolved. By the same token, China will always be a super power as long as China maintains its unity and independence. As I said a few times in this forum, there are only 3 real independent countries on this planet: China, Russia and US. None can destroy other(s). Collapse would only occur from within. Having been living in US for more than 30 years now, I can assure you that it was not US or any other country that brought down USSR per se. It was Russians themselves. On that note, I actually don't have much sympathy for the Russians on almost any subject. I am just trying to state the facts as far as US-China war is concerned.


Of course, they were scared of the USSR in the movies in the media because it was a positive influence on their people to work harder, and have more national unity for example.

But elites probably weren't all that scared if you look at some objective metrics. After all, their economic model was flawed in the start.

The entire country and economy basically focused only on military matters, ignoring everything else. They were not life-threatening.

Also, at that time USSR was way more divided from the inside than even the US, and we know the federal and ethnic/racial profile there.

The USSR basically never stood a chance. They were a superpower, but they couldn't even threaten the US alone, not to mention the US and the entire West it controls combined.

And today China can threaten not only the US (it's already above them) but the entire Collective West combined.

If I were the US, I would also try to start a war with China and try to neutralize them as soon as possible, as they are life-threatening.

But, I would not be so stupid and hubris-filled to realize that fact and act upon it only in 2025-2030, when they are already stronger than me, but many decades earlier for example.
 
Last edited:

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
You guys really underestimate the Soviet economy. They had more population than the US back then. And in a lot of hard stats like steel production, coal production, and electricity production they weren't behind either. Militarily of course they were the only other country with the capacity to wipe out the US and all its allies from the face of the Earth with their nuclear arsenal. So of course they couldn't be underestimated. Even today Russia is competitive with the US in a lot of hard stats.

Had the Sino-Soviet split not happened history could have been quite different.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
The truth is basically this, even if the USSR was of the same level of threat back then as China is today, it was still a way different situation.

The US during the Cold War had way better social cohesion, financial health, economic model, etc.

So even if another superpower managed to penetrate their global military standing and their dollar financial hegemony,

They would still survive. They were much healthier socially, they had way less debt and better financial metrics,

Their economy actually was leading in producing many different things. And they could survive that hit.

But today, take their dollar internalization and money printing away, and they would collapse in a civil war 99%.

So, even if the USSR at that time = China today. It still doesn't mean that they won't opt in for a hot war with China, unlike with the USSR.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
CBC.ca

Canadian universities and researchers will soon be ineligible for federal grants if they're affiliated with foreign institutions the government says pose a threat to national security.

On Tuesday the federal government
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in China, Russia and Iran as the "highest risk to Canada's national security."

The fed also released
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— quantum technologies, robotics, aerospace, space and satellite technology and medical and health-care technology.
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
It seems that far-right Anglo imperialists might be officially declaring war on Russia, China and the rest of humanity in 2024:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Every day we’re seeing the tragic consequences of the more dangerous world we’re living in. How we respond will define our future. And the choice is clear. Just like our enemies, we must be prepared for a new era of confrontation." - UK Defense Secretary Grant Shapps


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Defence Secretary Grant Shapps delivers major speech on UK's vision to deter threats​



Will the true free world / the global majority insist on appeasing these Anglo-Saxon n@zis (i.e. supremacists) or will it head the warnings of the past and confront and if necessary strategically defeat these wicked people?

Defeating Anglo-American imperialism will be the challenge of our time. The world will have to unite once more to also teach these "wannabe-rulers-of-earth" a lesson that they will never forget.
 
Last edited:
Top