V-22 Osprey Thread - News, Pics, Videos

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


USUK-Marines-Conclude-Exercise-Blue-Raptor-1024x768.jpg

Naval Today said:
U.S. Marine Corps Osprey aircraft embarked on Royal Navy’s HMS Ocean transferred Royal and US Marines ashore Corsica during a simulated beach assault which rounded off Exercise Blue Raptor.

The soldiers from Arbroath-based 45 Commando Royal Marines have been working with their US colleagues for the past few months, training and improving their track record of joint operations.

To round off the training, Green Berets from Whiskey Company 45 Commando stormed ashore in Corsica with their US Marine Corps counterparts from the Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force (A).

They made use of USMC Osprey aircraft in the last movement of Exercise Blue Raptor which saw them re-taking a stronghold from an enemy force.

The assault group took off from the Royal Navy flagship HMS Ocean, where the USMC aircraft and US Marines have been embarked for the past few weeks.

Exercise Blue Raptor represents the latest phase in the US Allied Maritime Basing Initiative which has sought to improve the integration of US forces with allies while operating in the Mediterranean.

The Osprey have been embarked on HMS Ocean for the past few weeks while the Royal Navy flagship is deployed on Cougar 15.

Love to see those Osprey spreading their wings to more and more allied vessels.
 
uwsjcmn5met3rbir0fj3.jpg

:) comes from:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
it's from yesterday:
Bell Touts Future Army Helicopter Design: 'V-280 Is Not a V-22'
A top official from Bell Helicopter said the company's design for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
's future tiltrotor fleet will be far different than the 30-year-old design of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The chopper, known as the V-280 Valor, is part of the Army's Joint Multi-Role Demonstrator program to develop the technology for the Pentagon's Future Vertical Lift program.

The concept aircraft advances the design of the V-22, the first tiltrotor aircraft flown by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to Vince Tobin, vice president of Advanced Tiltrotor Systems for Bell Helicopter.

"The V-22 has instructed on what tiltrotors can do, and that is great, but the V-280 is not a V-22," Tobin told an audience Thursday at an Army aviation symposium put on by the Association of the United States Army.

"We are going to do it better than we did on the V-22. The V-22 was designed in the 1980s ... and we have taken it under our imperatives to fix what wasn't perfect on the V-22 and get as close to perfect as we can on the V-280."

Bell, which is owned by Textron Inc., partnered with Lockheed to develop the V-280, which is scheduled to make its first demonstration flight next year.

The Army's development effort could lead to a potentially $100 billion Future Vertical Lift program to replace the service's fleets of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
utility helicopters made by Sikorsky and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
attack helicopters made by Boeing, though any aircraft probably wouldn't enter service until the 2030s.

"Back in 2011, one of the first things we wrestled with is do we want a ramp or do we want a ramp or do we want doors," Tobin said. "We ended up making the decision that the Army comes out of medium aircraft out of side doors. It was a bigger deal than you might think because if you know about a V-22, the entire cell rotates engine and all ... and everything that has to go between that has to go through that rotation point.

"We had fellow engineers that were pretty convinced that there was no way that you could not rotate the engines. It took us having to show a picture of the XV2 -- the very first tiltrotor ... that picture gave the engineers a little bit of a challenge that said the fellow engineers of the 1950s figured it out so we need to figure it out."

The resulting fixed-engine design opened the door for other improvements, Tobin said. In addition to allowing for side doors, the new design resulted in an improved wing design, he said.

Engineers originally thought that the wings on the V-22 had to be swept forward, Tobin said.

"The reason why V-22 wings are swept forward is because the engineers at the time didn't know how far the blades would flap in forward flight," Tobin said. "If you don't know how far the blades are going to flap, you better sweep the wings forward so the blades and the wings don't come in contact with each other.

"What we learned from over 300,000 hours now of V-22 flying is those blades don't flap in forward flight."

Selecting a straight wing design meant that that the mid-wing gear box was unneeded, Tobin said.

"Now we don't have to have a drive system coming into change the direction over top of the fuselage like on the V-22s ... that was a big deal -- no mid-wing gear box. We are down from five gear boxes on a V-22 to four."

The new wing design is now ready for the upcoming demonstration, Tobin said.

"We actually have a wing put together for the demonstrator -- the upper and lower surfaces are on the wing, all the hydraulics lines, all the electrical and all the test equipment is inside," Tobin said. "We are putting this airplane together, and we expect to fly it in the fall of 2017."
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
More :)
Also USAF, AFSOC have or almost her 50 CV-22.

MV-22 can refuel but small qty, carry 4.5t fuel transferable say max 2 t, a Super Hornet 12t max can transfer about 6 t no comparison with real Tanker, for help more interesting for refuel helos which carry less fuel.
USMC MV-22.JPG

USMC MV-22-2.JPG
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
SINGAPORE: Boeing eyes international COD role for V-22

  • 17 FEBRUARY, 2016

  • BY: GREG WALDRON
    SINGAPORE


Boeing believes it can build on a recent contract award from the US Navy for the V-22 Osprey and offer the tiltrotor to other future operators of the Lockheed Martin F-35B short take-off and vertical landing fighter.

Bell Boeing will supply 44 Ospreys - designated as the CMV-22B - to the USN to replace the service's Northrop Grumman C-2A Greyhound carrier on-board delivery (COD) aircraft.

A key modification will be a higher capacity fuel system, increasing range to 1,150nm (2,130km) from 860nm for the baseline MV-22B.

COD aircraft are an essential lifeline for carrier battle groups, delivering personnel, urgently needed spare parts, and other essentials, and crucially for F-35 operators, spare engines.

“We look for other countries that have carrier battle groups, where the V-22 could provide that long-range, flexible logistics resupply for them,” says Rick Lemaster, director tiltrotor business development at Boeing.

Previous trials have qualified the Osprey for carriage of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
it's from last week:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Air Force Special Operations Command would like to acquire three additional multi-mission V-22 Ospreys before the product line ceases, a service leader told reporters Feb. 25.

There is not much of an attrition reserve for Special Operations Command’s force of 50 CV-22s, said Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold, commander of Air Force Special Operations Command. “Before our production line slows down or goes cold, we should pursue the attrition reserve in the 50 airplanes and take it to 54.”

The service has 51 aircraft funded through fiscal year 2016, according to the 2017 Defense Department budget request released this month. Based on budget documents, the extra aircraft purchased in 2016 is meant to serve that reserve purpose. However, there are no other CV-22s requested within the Air Force’s future years defense program, meaning the service would need to fund three extra platforms in order to meet the commander’s goal.

It is necessary to have more of those aircraft in service because every once in a while an enemy weapon will make contact with a U.S. platform, he said. “We’re going to ding an airplane on occasion.”

AFSOC has already lost two of the tiltrotor aircraft in crashes — one in 2010 during a night raid in Afghanistan and the other in 2012 during a training accident at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. During a third incident in 2013, three Air Force CV-22 Ospreys bound for the United Nations compound in the city of Bor in South Sudan were hit with gunfire while trying to evacuate U.S. citizens from the civil war-torn region.

Having four aircraft in attrition reserve as back-ups when an aircraft goes down will ensure that AFSOC forces are flying at its capacity of at least 50 airplanes well into the future, Heithold said.

The commander had no complaints about the current budget proposal noting that “U.S. special forces have been protected by the Department of Defense,” which has provided them with reasonable funding and manpower to perform their missions effectively. “I support DoD’s budget submission the way it’s written because I’ve been through the Army’s budget,” he said. In the 2017 budget request, the Army’s base budget was cut $1.4 billion from what was enacted in fiscal year 2016.

However, getting those extra aircraft into the budget before the production line ends is critical, he said. “I believe we need to try to get the attrition reserve V-22s at some point," he added. “It’s my job to make that argument that you need to buy … more V-22s before you buy the next bayonet or special forces” platform.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

151104-F-ZT531-091_web.jpg
 
Top