MwRYum
Major
The reason is that on the overall politik side it changes nothing, but this time most of the attacks are on the media warfront - just look at the first 24 hours, the Western media were so egging it on and expecting massive protests marching down the US embassy in Beijing, but all they got, apart from the delayed response from the propaganda ministry, some hushed words online that the PLAN not aggressively ramming the USS Lassen, were but an old man doing a short-lived protest that got quickly whisked away by the police; 48 hours went by and without any successful escalation (even the announcement of the Japanese navy joining the round 2 FON op failed to rile things up) the Western media finally given up and by the 72nd hours, it was Syria back on the headline, SCS FON op failed to materialize as crisis and relegated to page 2.I don't know the reason that you continuously insisted on a "hurted pride" for China. The reality is a rising superpower, China, has established a position in South China Sea, where the reigning superpower, the US, couldn't remove short of war and staged a tour in the name of FoN to please its Asian allies and reenforce its influence. China is gaining in strategic terms for this geopolitical game and the situation in South China Sea is better than a stale-mate for China. For all the Chinese I know and observed, they aren't emotionally hurt for this incident at all, nor do they want the Chinese government to act particularly dramatic.
Of course, what the media said can always be entirely something else.
The next tangible event now is the Admiral Harry Harris visit to Beijing on Nov 2nd-5th...it'd be interesting how it'll turns out .
So that's why I said the the Chinese does took a beating on the pride side, but other than that no tangible lost suffered.