US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

lych470

Junior Member
Registered Member
I will post a Japanese article about the US military's dependence on Chinese products.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The text shows that certain electronic products that the man with a plan (Trump) has removed from the reciprocal tariff, there are a large number of Chinese products related to the production of weapons for the US military.

Figure 1: U.S. military weapons supply chain dependence on Chinese products across the Department of Defense
View attachment 150088
Red China
Blue England
Pink Japan
Green India
Yellow Taiwan

Figure 2: U.S. Army weapons supply chain dependence on Chinese products through 2023
View attachment 150089
Red China
Blue England
Green India
Pink Japan
Beige Australia

Figure 3: U.S. Navy weapons supply chain dependence on Chinese products through 2023
View attachment 150090
Red China
Blue England
Yellow Taiwan
Pink Japan
Orange South Korea

Figure 4: U.S. Air Force weapons supply chain dependence on Chinese products through 2023
View attachment 150091
Red China
Blue England
Yellow Taiwan
Pink Japan
Orange South Korea

No wonder Trump and Hegseth increased the DoD budget to $1 Trillion. All that smuggling must add up to the programs cost.

In other news, here's an opinion piece from Frank Kendall, former Secretary of the Air Force. It gives some nice insights on the procurement of the NGAD/F-47. Some choice quotes below:

"When I returned to the Pentagon as Secretary of the Air Force in 2021, I found that the Air Force had decided to pursue a follow-on to the F-22, a fighter designed for manned Penetrating Counter Air, or PCA, missions. Such missions involve flying deep into enemy airspace and fighting against robust, state-of-the-art defenses. The PCA emphasis brought with it significant costs — tens of billions for development and hundreds of millions per aircraft for production. These expenses limit the potential aircraft inventory to small numbers. We currently have fewer than 200 F-22s. These airplanes are precious, and we can’t tolerate high losses in this fleet. ...

If the Trump administration’s strategy emphasizes homeland security and defensive scenarios, wouldn’t a lower cost design more focused on Defensive Counter-Air, or DCA, make more sense? Would a multirole next-generation design, like the F-35, make more sense? Would an aircraft designed to work with uncrewed tactical aircraft, like the Air Force uncrewed
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, make more sense? The decision to buy the F-47 needs to be the right choice for the future — this is the only new crewed fighter aircraft the Air Force will likely pursue for a long time. ...

The F-47 will be able to control uncrewed aircraft, but it isn’t optimized for that function. Congress needs to ensure that the Trump administration has considered the relationship between the F-47, the Trump defense strategy and the overall future of the Air Force. ...

When I left the Pentagon, the Department of the Air Force had a list of unfunded strategic priorities that were higher priority than NGAD. At the top of the list were counter-space weapons and airbase defense. Neither of these is a direct Air Force responsibility, but both are critical to the success of the entire Joint Force. China is well on its way to fielding robust space-based targeting systems that threaten all of our land- and sea-based forces. We must acquire counter-space systems at scale or China will be able to target all of our assets at sea and on the ground with impunity and in real time. China also has an ever-expanding arsenal of sophisticated weapons ready to strike our airbases in the Pacific. Those bases are limited in numbers, not well defended and each is subject to attack by literally hundreds of missiles of all types. Our new F-47s — and all of our forward-based aircraft — will never get off the ground if we don’t address these threats through substantial budget increases."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top