US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
So what? Will they cancel F-35C and replace it with Advanced Super Hornet?
Studied considering

F-35C vs Super Hornet. It’s on!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

MOD have ordered in FY 2016 3 EA-18G for free coz* and 200 millions in less for the Zumwalt USS Lyndon B. Johnson the 3rd in service 2020 but remains expensive :D :rolleyes:

*UPDATE 1-Boeing, General Dynamics reach $400 mln A-12 settlement with U.S. Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


And i find page 14 :cool:
FY 2016 $198 Million A-12 In-kind Settlement does not reflect Total Obligation Authority (TOA). No additional resources were provided in FY 2016 to the Department of the Navy. The three EA-18G aircraft from the A-12 settlement and the FY 2017 PB addition of 7 EA-18G aircraft in FY 2016 increases the total PoR from 150 to 160.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
... Coyote color.
Coyote Brown
81613E
Hex
129,97,62
RGB
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


LEiH.jpg
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
So what? Will they cancel F-35C and replace it with Advanced Super Hornet?
Possible but unlikely. F35 deriders are hoping these trials show that the USAF and USN are loosing confidence in the F35. I however suspect that the results of the fly offs between F35A vs A10 and F35C vs FA18 are intended and will prove again that the F35 program is sound.
Coyote Brown
81613E
Hex
129,97,62
RGB
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


LEiH.jpg
that's the one Jura. Coyote brown is used by both the USMC and US Army for infantry equipment as it's a flat dark earth that is relatively common in nature. The Marines use it for there TA50 gear that is packs, utility belts, boots, body armor and it's found in all USMC camouflage. The Army uses it for there boots and it's found in there multicam uniforms as well as a number of new firearms.
 
Today at 10:29 AM
very interesting: "Northrop’s operating margins held at 11%, according to the company’s 26 January fourth quarter earnings report. If the USAF trainer competition turns into a price-shootout, as many analysts have speculated, Northrop could damage its tenuous margins."
Analyst floats theory for Northrop CEO's caution on T-X
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
Is Northrop Grumman Bailing Out of T-X?
Northrop Grumman has “not reached a conclusion” about whether it will pursue the T-X trainer competition for the Air Force, Chief Executive Officer Wes Bush said Thursday. Speaking in a fourth quarter/end of year earnings conference call, Bush said his extremely cautious tone on the program is “a reflection of the discipline we have” in carefully evaluating programs before committing to work that may not be profitable. “We are really looking at these opportunities through the cold, hard lens of, ‘what does the RFP [request for proposals] really tell you?’” Bush explained. He said the company wants to ensure “we’re not kidding ourselves about the real cost and what the investment would look like.” The final RFP for the T-X was released Dec. 30, and the terms had not changed from an earlier draft version, so Bush’s diffidence was noteworthy. While the company has made significant investments of its own money in T-X, “which, by the way, tend to have broader applicability,” Bush said, “we need to be … thoughtful on every single one of these RFP activities” and the potential “business case.” He doesn’t want the company to “walk ourselves into a decision to do something just because we’ve been doing it.” Northrop Grumman has a prototype T-X flying, built by its Scaled Composites subsidiary.

Asked by one analyst if the final RFP indicates the Air Force is setting up a “price shootout” among competitors, Bush said, broadly, “If it’s a situation where it’s just low cost because that’s what the customer really cares about, and we don’t see a whole lot of differentiation” among products being offered, “those are probably less interesting opportunities for us.” Of greater interest to the company are programs where the government sees “a little bit of a trade space between cost, and performance, and value.” The Air Force has said it is more willing to trade price versus value on the JSTARS replacement, though Bush did not connect his remarks to that specific program. The bottom line on T-X, Bush said, is that the company now has all the information and “sometimes it takes a little longer to call it” and come to a “high-quality decision.” Bush said “we are looking at how the customer is communicating around its view of the business deal and what’s really important to them.”

Raytheon and Leonardo announced without much explanation Wednesday that they will not pursue the T-X as a team, but the topic did not come up during Raytheon’s own fourth-quarter call Thursday. Industry sources said Thursday the two companies couldn’t agree on how to get the cost of their offering—the T-100, a variant of the M-346 Master—down to levels that Raytheon believed would make the jet competitive in the T-X contest.
source is AirForceMag
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
here you go Trump: Military Spending 'More Important' Than Balanced Budget
US President Donald Trump said Thursday that a strong military is “more important” than a balanced budget, signaling a willingness to use deficit spending to fund the Pentagon — a move that may fly in the face of his pick for the Office of Management and Budget.

Speaking to Fox News’ Sean Hannity Thursday night, Trump said “a balanced budget is fine. But sometimes, you have to fuel the well in order to really get the economy going. And we have to take care of our military. Our military is more important to me than a balanced budget because we'll get there with a balanced budget.”

Later in the interview, Trump repeated that statement, saying: “I want a balanced budget eventually. But I want to have a strong military. To me, that's much more important than anything.”

That position may create tensions with his OMB pick, Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., a budget hawk who is expected to force fiscal discipline onto the Trump administration.

Since winning election in November, Trump has repeatedly promised to raise funding support for the US military. His plans include increasing the active-duty Army to 540,000 soldiers, the Navy to 350 ships, an Air Force fleet of 1,200 fighter aircraft and a Marine Corps with 36 battalions. He has also pledged a “state-of-the-art missile defense system” to modernize the Navy’s cruisers and to provide ballistic missile defense capabilities.

Almost immediately after the election, members of the fiscally conservative Tea Party Caucus in the House raised concerns about such spending plans. Mulvaney is seen as a leading voice from the tea party movement.

Mackenzie Eaglen, an analyst with the American Enterprise Institute, says Mulvaney made it clear in his testimony that he will send over what she called an “ideologically radical” budget proposal – one that will seek to avoid any sort of deficit spending, and which will be dead on arrival, based on how similar budget proposals have struggled to even get through the Republican-controlled House, let alone survive a battle in the Senate.

The Senate, with 48 democrats who “cannot be ignored,” will be a check on Mulvaney’s budget aspirations, according to Eaglen, who says they are smart enough to hold defense spending as a hostage to increase non-defense spending.

“Defense is still the best leverage point Democrats have,” Eaglen said. “They know it, and why would they change now? They will continue to make it a point of leverage.”

As to Trump’s comments on Thursday, Eaglen says they are in line with previous statements.

“He doesn’t care [about deficit spending] on defense and that makes perfect sense if you consider defense the first priority, and you see some jobs benefit in things that are already validated and vetted requirements,” such as major defense programs, Eaglen said.

Todd Harrison, an analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says that the last few months have driven home a lesson on Trump: that when he says something specific, people should take him at his word.

"When he says he will build a wall, he will try to build a wall. All these things, when he says something specific, it looks like he's going to try and follow through," Harrison said. And here, Trump is saying "he will treat the military differently than other parts of the budget."

However, Harrison says that literal reading of Trump's comments also means the president said government spending cuts won't come from defense - and not that the defense budget will get a major boost.

Trump’s words will likely be welcomed by Sen. John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee. In a Jan. 24 hearing, McCain ripped into Mulvaney over concerns about defense spending. McCain has proposed $640 billion for the 2018 defense budget, something supported by his counterpart in the House, Mac Thornberry, R-Texas.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
here you go Trump: Military Spending 'More Important' Than Balanced Budget

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I don' t " go " coz a bit aware and quite sure the 46 and not 48 democrats senators accept a more big budget only if others budgets increase health etc... it is the deal and also valid for a part of Republicans and in more Trump Is not unanimous in his party i don' t say it as a naysayer only the true but i hope her plan worck as i have always say but...

In France a President as Trump with majority in the 2 chambers do her plans without problems to USA the Congress is very powerful and her plan not easy to be implemented ... !
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Soldiers test Stryker with 30 mm cannon, more upgrades to come

TWICKENHAM, England (Army News Service) -- For the first time, Soldiers got to unleash the distinct "brrrt" gunfire of a 30 mm cannon mounted on top of a Stryker combat vehicle as part of testing last week at Maryland's Aberdeen Proving Ground, the program's manager said Tuesday.

This summer, Soldiers with the 2nd Cavalry Regiment out of Vilseck, Germany, will also get in-depth training with the new Stryker at Aberdeen before the Dragoons become the first Army unit to receive them.

"The purpose there is to prove out our gunnery training plan that will support fielding next year," Col. Glenn Dean said of the upcoming exercise, while speaking at the International Armored Vehicles conference. "We'll have a number of crews come over, and they'll get to operate and drive the vehicle."

The Army now has four prototypes of the new Stryker, also nicknamed Dragoon, with four more expected to be delivered in the next few months, he added.

With the program's relatively quick acquisition of the vehicles, which began in fall 2015 at a cost of more than $400 million, the Army plans to have the first of the 83 Dragoons fielded by the end of fiscal year 2018, according to the colonel.

If things go well, more of the powerful cannons -- most notably known for their use on a "tank-killer" aircraft, the A-10 Thunderbolt II -- may be fitted on future Stryker vehicles.

"We're not going to put a 30 mm cannon on every Stryker; it's a selection of them," he said. "Part of the decision on how many for the future will depend on what 2nd Cavalry Regiment has to say on what works or what doesn't work, or if we have enough or too many."

The Stryker program is now focusing more on improving the way the combat vehicle fights and moves, after years of modifying it to withstand attacks.

"While we were at war [in Iraq] our focus was survivability, and we continued to add survivability to the platform and sacrificed mobility and ignored lethality," he said. "How do we get this program back to a balance [of all three]?"

After seeing Russia's upgraded combat vehicles during the country's invasion of Ukraine in 2015, Army leaders recognized a need to revamp the Stryker fleet.

"The Russians, it turns out, had upgraded and fielded significant capabilities while we were engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan," Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Daniel B. Allyn said after the first Dragoon prototype was delivered in October.

As a result, existing Stryker weaponry, he added, places U.S. forces at "unacceptable risk."

So far, about $20 million has been saved in the Stryker Dragoon program, savings that have allowed Dean and others to pursue other efforts to enhance its lethality.

"We're so far under budget, we were able to start a second upgrade program with the money we saved," he said.

Using the freed-up money, the program will roll out the new fleet of Strykers with the ECB2a remote weapon station improvement, which gives greater flexibility to employ currently assigned weapons.

"Keeping a good eye on balancing your checkbook and being frugal allows you to buy more capability," Dean said.

The ECB2a upgrade can also integrate javelin launch systems, giving commanders another option to deploy the anti-tank missile or even more of them at the same time, he added.

A second lethality program, the ECB2b modified improved target acquisition system, or MITAS, is also under development but was paid for with separate funding. This upgrade can help accurately launch TOW missiles from a Stryker.

"Those two efforts combined will touch about 70 percent of the Stryker fleet," Dean said.

To improve mobility, the ECP1 program also plans to upgrade the electrical power, mechanical power, in-vehicle network, and chassis of many Stryker vehicles.

"Ultimately, these upgrades will go to refit all of the double V Stryker brigades in the force," Dean said.

There is even a Stryker demonstrator equipped with a mobile expeditionary high-energy laser, and there's talk of adding technology to neutralize threats to counter unmanned aerial systems, but it's too early to know if those variants will ever be rolled out, he said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Possible the last OH-58 Sqn or maybe remains a second, in inventory now 50 OH-58A/C/D initialy 360 D alight Attack helo the scout for the AH-64 as you can see in the video
ofc after back to USA do transition on AH-64E and RQ-7 Atk Recc Bat

Kiowa Warriors pass torch to Apache attack helicopters in South Korea
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1st Squadron is the Air Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stationed at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Rotational Forces Deployment, 2nd Combat Aviation Brigade,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 
Top