US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Thank you for the compliment, AFB! I was kind of surprised to see my name in this particular post though :) well, I know you commented on kwaigonegin's post, but ... I haven't heard of General Shinseki until now :) A moment ago I looked up the very basic information:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and what most recently happened:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
On ship to shore connectors yes they are great and gives you ability to sort out the equipment off shore where ports are not available and allows for landing huge amount of material without the mother ship coming close to the coast

But the problem is that they require calm seas and takes time and not every good if a enemy fighter swoops in from above pretty much lost a entire fleet of equipment and you need to assemble all the barges etc

This is why the new US cargo ship has those hovercrafts ideally you want 8-10 LCAC doing the job so they could upload plenty of equipment to land and do it very quickly

Ship to shore connectors

120cc18dbbbffd484f7b326bd23d0444_zps2d0fd1e2.jpg


ebe9f9db3da74dbe9b183c437e29f2b7_zps3db7a5ef.jpg


b258fe88d369db122d566debb76d9224_zps3604ecc2.jpg
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Good luck

And Good news
Well, for his sake and his family...I am glad the Sgt. is coming home.

However, the way it was accomplished is extremely unsettling to me.

Five very high level Talban operatives, all of whom will be a horrible danger to the US (and who have been in the past, several of whom have American blood on their hands) were negotiated for and exchanged.

That is a very, very bad precedent IMHO, and will result in open season on any US soldier that any terror/extremist group can capture and hold.

But that's just my opinion.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



6239110160_39722d63ce_z.jpg


World Maritime News said:
AXYS Technologies Inc (AXYS) has announced the completion of pre-commissioning of a WindSentinel platform for the United States Navy project to validate an offshore floating LiDAR wind resource assessment system.

AXYS teamed up with Sound & Sea Technology (SST) as well as DNV GL to secure the US Navy contract and supply the system.

The LiDAR underwent an initial six month side by side testing process overseen by DNV GL in 2013. Upon passing this test the LiDAR was integrated onto the WindSentinel platform.

AXYS and SST personnel assisted in the commissioning of the WindSentinel platform the week of May 12 in Port Hueneme, California.

The WindSentinel is now ready for deployment and waiting the final deployment location to be determined by the US Navy.

AXYS supplied the WindSentinel floating LiDAR system, which accurately measures offshore wind speed and direction up to the blade-tip heights of 200m.

The WindSentinel has recorded a number of world firsts, including the first commercial deployment and the most remote LiDAR offshore wind resource assessment ever conducted, 36 miles offshore.

Sound & Sea Technology will provide overall management of the program, coordination with the Navy, ocean engineering expertise, environmental planning and installation support.

DNV GL will provide an independent evaluation of the validity of the floating LiDAR system by identifying measurement requirements and metrics to qualify the system for use in wind power development.

These metrics will be adapted from DNV GL’s recommended practice for validating LIDAR measurements, “DNV Sodar and Lidar Guidelines.”

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) uses Lasers and Radar to perform very exacting measurements. They can be used for atmospheric measurements as well as target designation. mine detection, armor detection, biological detection and many other uses.

That the US Navy is delving into their use is interesting news....I would guess for atmospheric and possibly mine detection.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well, for his sake and his family...I am glad the Sgt. is coming home.

However, the way it was accomplished is extremely unsettling to me.

Five very high level Talban operatives, all of whom will be a horrible danger to the US (and who have been in the past, several of whom have American blood on their hands) were negotiated for and exchanged.

That is a very, very bad precedent IMHO, and will result in open season on any US soldier that any terror/extremist group can capture and hold.

But that's just my opinion.
Apparently Jeff, Secretary Hagel Reads your posts. As he as shot back this reply,
Hagel: Bergdahl's health required urgent action
Jun. 1, 2014 - 09:44AM |


By Julie Pace and Lolita C. Baldor
The Associated Press
FILED UNDER
News
Bowe Bergdahl ZOOM
U.S. Army gt. Bowe Bergdahl. (Army / via AP)

WASHINGTON — Nearly five years after his capture by insurgents, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s “safety and health were both in jeopardy” and officials had to act quickly to obtain his release, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Sunday.

The only American prisoner of the Afghan war was freed Saturday after President Obama agreed to release five high-level Afghan detainees from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

“While Bowe was gone, he was never forgotten,” Obama said from the White House Rose Garden, where he was joined by Bergdahl’s parents. “The United States of America does not ever leave our men and women in uniform behind.”

Two Republican lawmakers, Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon of California and Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, said Obama violated U.S. law when he approved an exchange involving prisoners at Guantanamo without notifying Congress 30 days in advance.

In response, the White House said that officials considered what they called “unique and exigent circumstances” and decided to go ahead with the transfer in spite of the legal requirement.

And Hagel, who was traveling to Afghanistan to meet with U.S. troops, said the action was not relayed to Congress because of its urgency. He said intelligence indicated that Bergdahl’s “health was deteriorating.”

At Bagram Air Field, Hagel thanked the special operations forces that participated in the rescue. Gen. Joseph Dunford said there was a sense of excitement in the headquarters as the news spread

“You almost got choked up,” he said. “It was pretty extraordinary. It has been almost five years and he is home.”

Bergdahl’s parents, Bob and Jani, led a tireless campaign to keep their son’s story in the public eye. They were expected to hold a news conference Sunday in their hometown of Hailey, Idaho, where residents were planning a homecoming celebration for the soldier.

Bergdahl, in good condition and able to walk, was handed over to U.S. special operations forces by the Taliban in an area of eastern Afghanistan, near the Pakistani border, U.S. officials said. In a statement on its website, the Taliban put the location on the outskirts of Khost province.

The government of Qatar served as the go-between in the negotiations. Qatar is taking custody of the five Afghan detainees who were held at Guantanamo.

In weighing the swap, U.S. officials decided that it could help further the effort to reach reconciliation with the Taliban, something the U.S. sees as key to reaching a level of security in Afghanistan. But they acknowledged that there was a risk of emboldening other insurgent groups who might grab U.S. troops or citizens in an effort the secure the release of others prisoners.

Several dozen U.S. special operations forces, backed by multiple helicopters and surveillance aircraft, were involved in securing Bergdahl’s transfer from about 18 Taliban members.

Bergdahl is believed to have been held by the Haqqani network since June 30, 2009. Haqqani operates in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region and claims allegiance to the Afghan Taliban but operates with some degree of autonomy.

The U.S. believes Bergdahl was held for the bulk of his captivity in Pakistan, but officials said it was not clear when he was transported to eastern Afghanistan.

Officials said Bergdahl was taken to Bagram Air Field for medical evaluations, then transferred to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, a military facility in Germany, before he’s returned to the U.S. An official said Bergdhal was tentatively scheduled to go to the San Antonio Military Medical Center where he would be reunited with his family.

Bergdahl’s parents had been in Washington on a previously planned visit when Obama called Saturday with news of their son’s release.

As they stood with Obama in the Rose Garden, Bob Bergdahl said his son was having trouble speaking English after his rescue. The elder Bergdahl, who grew a long, thick beard to honor his son, had worked to learn Pashto, the language spoken by his son’s captors, and delivered a message to him and the people of Afghanistan in that language.

Switching back to English, he said “the complicated nature of this recovery will never really be comprehended.”

The circumstances surrounding Bergdahl’s capture remain murky. There has been some speculation that he willingly walked away from his unit, raising the question of whether he could be charged with being absent without leave or desertion.

In 2012, Rolling Stone magazine quoted emails Bergdahl is said to have sent to his parents that suggest he was disillusioned with America’s mission in Afghanistan, had lost faith in the U.S. Army and was considering desertion. Bergdahl told his parents he was “ashamed to even be American.” The Associated Press could not independently authenticate the emails.

Hagel declined to say whether he believes Bergdahl was attempting to desert the Army or go AWOL when he walked away from his unit and disappeared.

“Our first priority is assuring his well-being and his health and getting him reunited with his family,” Hagel said. “Other circumstances that may develop and questions — those will be dealt with later.”

A senior U.S. official told The Associated Press that the Army would make the decision on any charges but that the feeling at the moment was that Bergdahl had suffered enough in his ordeal. All the officials who discussed details of Bergdahl’s transfer insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to be identified.

The U.S. has long sought Bergdahl’s release, but there was renewed interest in his case as Obama finalized plans to pull nearly all American forces out of Afghanistan by the end of 2016.

Officials said the Taliban signaled to the U.S. in November that they were ready to start fresh talks on the issue of detainees. After the U.S. received proof that Bergdahl was still alive, indirect talks began, with Qatar sending messages back and forth between the two parties.

The five Guantanamo detainees departed the base on a U.S. military aircraft Saturday afternoon. Under the conditions of their release, they will be banned from traveling outside of Qatar for at least one year.

Obama and the emir of Qatar spoke last week about the conditions of the release, which have been codified in a memorandum of understanding between the two countries, officials said.

The detainees were among the most senior Afghans still held at the prison:

■ Abdul Haq Wasiq, who served as the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence,

■ Mullah Norullah Nori, a senior Taliban commander in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif when the Taliban fought U.S. forces in late 2001

■ Khairullah Khairkhwa, who served in various Taliban positions including interior minister and had direct ties to Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden

■ Mohammed Nabi, who served as chief of security for the Taliban in Qalat, Afghanistan, and later worked as a radio operator for the Taliban’s communications office in Kabul

■ Mohammad Fazl, whom Human Rights Watch says could be prosecuted for war crimes for presiding over the mass killing of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan in 2000 and 2001 as the Taliban sought to consolidate their control over the country.

In a statement on the Taliban website that was translated by the Washington-based SITE Intelligence Group, the Taliban said it “was and has been for a long time attempting to free all the imprisoned Afghan prisoners inside and outside the country, and restoring the right of freedom to them quickly.”

The Taliban said it was seeking the release of additional prisoners but offered no specifics.

In Pakistan, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said her government was “not aware of” Bergdahl’s release or the negotiations leading up to it. She declined to comment further.

Baldor reported from Singapore. Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann and Darlene Superville in Washington, Rahim Faiez in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Zarar Khan in Islamabad contributed to this report.

Administration pushes for drone transparency
Afghanistan strike data still hidden
Jun. 1, 2014 - 10:39AM |

By Brian Everstine
Staff writer Military times
FILED UNDER
News
Congress & DOD
The Defense Department is pushing for more transparency in providing information on international drone strikes in countries such as Yemen, while still not releasing drone strike data for its continued operations in Afghanistan.

President Obama and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel both said last month the department is looking at ways to be more transparent as a way to publicly explain the country’s decision making, provide increased legitimacy for its actions and increase accountability in government.

“I also believe we must be more transparent about both the basis of our counterterrorism actions and the manner in which they are carried out. We have to be able to explain them publicly, whether it is drone strikes or training partners,” Obama said May 28 during a commencement address at the Military Academy in West Point, New York. “I will increasingly turn to our military to take the lead and provide information to the public about our efforts.”

Hagel told reporters May 28 that the military’s transition to transparency is a centerpiece of Obama’s presidency.

“We’re working through that now,” Hagel said while en route to a visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. “We’re working with Congress on this. We’re working interagency on this. And that’s something as high a priority for the president as anything else.”

Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby said May 23 that the department will not “talk process publicly about how and when those decisions are going to be made,” but that the department is “committed” to increasing its transparency.

While this discussion is happening, however, U.S. Central Command and Air Forces Central Command continue to withhold data on drone strikes in Afghanistan, a reversal from a previous policy where AFCENT would publicly announce the total weapons releases from remotely piloted aircraft each month.

In March last year, Air Forces Central reversed its policy of providing the data, which it had previously released to “provide more detailed information on RPA ops in Afghanistan.”

The data first appeared in November 2012, and appeared for three more months before being removed from later releases. Air Forces Central also went back and removed numbers from previously released airpower summaries without notification. U.S. Central Command said in a statement that the decision to remove the statistics was made in collaboration with the International Security Assistance Force because it disproportionately focused on weapons releases solely from drones.

ISAF and CENTCOM officials said the data would be available through the Freedom of Information Act, and an Air Force Times’ Freedom of Information Act request for the data made last Mayis still pending.

The last release with the data showed that of 192 total weapons releases for January 2013, 44 were from drones. There were 494 drone strikes for all of 2012, 294 for all of 2011 and 2,077 for all of 2010.

The most recent release from May 14 showed 115 weapons releases in April and 414 so far in 2014, compared with 2,756 for all of 2013.

The push for more transparency of the armed drone program comes as the Obama administration is pushing to move most, or all, control of the program out of the CIA and into the Defense Department, though the plan has not been finalized.
North Korean defector separates fact from fiction for Area IV KATUSAs
May 30, 2014

By Joel Changhoon Lee


Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldiers across Area IV gathered to receive a lecture from a North Korean defector. The Area IV Republic of Korea Army Support Group invited Choi Jung-hoon, a security lecturer and former North Korean soldier, as a guest speaker to teach the KATUSAs the reality of North Korea and the necessity for unification on May 27, 2014.
Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldiers across Area IV gathered to receive a lecture from a North Korean defector. The Area IV Republic of Korea Army Support Group invited Choi Jung-hoon, a security lecturer and former North Korean soldier, as a guest speaker to teach the KATUSAs the reality of North Korea and the necessity for unification on May 27, 2014.
Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldiers across Area IV gathered to receive a lecture from a North Korean defector. The Area IV Republic of Korea Army Support Group invited Choi Jung-hoon, a security lecturer and former North Korean soldier, as a guest speaker to teach the KATUSAs the reality of North Korea and the necessity for unification on May 27, 2014.
Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldiers across Area IV gathered to receive a lecture from a North Korean defector. The Area IV Republic of Korea Army Support Group invited Choi Jung-hoon, a security lecturer and former North Korean soldier, as a guest speaker to teach the KATUSAs the reality of North Korea and the necessity for unification on May 27, 2014.
Related Links
Army.mil: Asia and Pacific News
CAMP HENRY, South Korea (May 30, 2014) -- Korean Augmentation to the United States Army Soldiers across Area IV gathered to receive a lecture from a North Korean defector. The Area IV Republic of Korea Army Support Group invited Choi Jung-hoon, a security lecturer and former North Korean soldier, as a guest speaker to teach the KATUSAs the reality of North Korea and the necessity for unification on May 27.

Choi started by recalling his Military career in North Korea. He served in the North Korean Military for 10 years. His father and two brothers were also government officers, working in Intelligence.

"North Korea cannot change itself. There is no one who can sacrifice their lives for freedom and democracy due to the guilt-by-association system" Choi said.

"Every relative of the criminals who betrayed Kim Jong-un is executed, which makes North Koreans feel very terrified."

He escaped from North Korea in December 2006 and took one year to arrive here by passing through China and Thailand. Upon his arrival he started to fight for the freedom and liberation of North Koreans. His anti-North Korea actions resulted in his last brother, who had remained in North Korea, to be executed by a firing squad in 2011.

During the lecture, he asked a question of the KATUSAs, "What is the standard North Korean rifle?" However, not a single KATUSA could answer correctly.

Choi then quoted a phrase from Sun Tzu's the Art of the War, the oldest book on strategy. "If you know your enemy and yourself; in a hundred battles you will never be in peril."

"North Korean Soldiers are tested on the knowledge from Korean Military weapon to common senses of South Korea's society annually," Choi added.

He encouraged KATUSAs to learn more about North Korea to protect their country against the enemy.

"I visited plenty of troops as a security lecturer, it was my first time to speak to KATUSAs and I was glad to tell them the truth of North Korea. I hope all KATUSAs have a pride in being a South Korean soldier," Choi said.

Choi's lecture had the desired impact as the KATUSAs in 19th Expeditionary Sustainment Command walked away with a firmer grasp on their purpose.

Cpl. Han Hee-won said, "Today I learned the reality of North Korea by attending the lecture. I think we need to be alert the threat of North Korea."
 
On Maintenance, Sailors:

Posted on InsideDefense.com: May 30, 2014

Naval Sea Systems Command in its new strategic business plan is renewing its focus on improving shipboard maintenance and rebuilding crew size in order to improve the readiness of its existing ships, NAVSEA Commander Vice Adm. William Hilarides told reporters last week.

The Navy is still recovering from years of second-rate modernization and maintenance work, Hilarides said
on May 29 during a media roundtable at the NAVSEA headquarters in Washington. This has lead to poor productivity in public as well as private shipyards, and a series of badly executed availabilities, he said.

Simultaneously, a strained fiscal environment means the Navy's existing submarines and surface ships are facing increased capabilities requirements and longer mission times, he noted.

"I want to talk about the 289 ships in service today and what it takes to keep them at sea," Hilarides said. "We're going to need more out of those ships because they are going to be steaming around more, the requirements for the capabilities are going to continue to increase and the money is going to go down."

Ship maintenance also faces significant challenges due to budget uncertainty, Hilarides emphasized. Without sufficient lead time to plan availabilities and order equipment, maintenance work becomes less efficient and more costly.

"We end up with these, a series of availabilities that were just, I'll say, poorly planned and as a result poorly executed," Hilarides said, adding that funding uncertainty forces the Navy to plan "with blinders on."

In order to mitigate any impact on readiness, the Navy plans to focus on "doing our maintenance and modernization cost effectively, delivering in a timely manner, and getting our organization structure ready to respond, adapt and move out," Hilarides told reporters.

One way in which the Navy plans to drive cost down is to rely more on fixed-price contracts for private yard ship maintenance, he noted.

In addition, the Navy is looking to rebuild the size of its crews and increase the technical expertise of its sailors after a period of downsizing, Hilarides said.

The Navy has reinstated intermediate maintenance activities at regional maintenance centers so that sailors can learn more technical skills, he said, adding that the service bought back most of the billets in these centers. This will allow sailors to learn how to perform minor ship repair work that is currently being done by contractors.

Increasing the technical expertise of the Navy's sailors so that they can do their own repair work at sea will lower the cost of individual ship availabilities, make ships more resilient and increase crew morale, Hilarides emphasized.

"Frankly, it will make happier sailors," he said. "What they signed up to be in the Navy for was to learn those hard technical skills. Most of them grew up trying to take apart cars and lawn mowers and things, that's what they loved to do. They joined the Navy to go learn more skills that way, and we have to make sure we fulfill our part in that bargain."

Still, sailors will face a steep learning curve because a lot of institutional knowledge has been lost, Hilarides acknowledged.

"Again, getting the sailors comfortable with their mechanical skills, with their ability to go do controlled work, that is take it apart in accordance with the procedure, get the right parts, understand how to align those parts and put it back together -- that's a slow rebuild. That's got to be done very carefully," Hilarides said.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Apparently Jeff, Secretary Hagel Reads your posts. As he as shot back this reply,

Well, I was not going to go into the circumstances of his capture, or the emails he had sent to his family. But that article mentioned them. Here in Idaho this is all well known. The young man apparently became put out with the mission, indicated he was ashamed to be an American and was considering going AWOL.

We simply do not know whether this is what occurred on the day he went missing. but we do know it was not due to an enemy attack where others could tell us what happened. He simply went missing.

My point stands, despite what Hagel or Obama may say.

These five individuals that were released were Sr. Taliban leaders and very dangerous men. They have American blood already on their hand and IMHO, should all have been executed long ago after we determined we had gotten all of the G2 out of them possible. To release them is simply unimaginable and reprehensible IMHO. It will prove bad...and will probably cost far more lives in the future and put far more US men and women at risk, in harm's way...and as I say, lead to far worse.

What will we then say to those parents, family, and friends?

Anyhow, these are my feelings. I know the family is glad to have their son back, and I cannot speak ill of their joy. I can however take exception to how it was accomplished and to what the consequences may well cause.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
My take is that its good to have a American POW back but like you I don't like the Devil's bargain the Obama administration made.
to get him home we traded five top tier Taliban leadership.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

to the Taliban this will be taken as a sign of weakness, and those five will be back to the fight the second they touch Afghan soil.
 

Rahul M

Just Hatched
Registered Member
the 3 terrorists India released in return for 150 odd passenger and crew of IC-814 went on to

omar sheikh - helped plan 9/11 and was responsible for the abduction and murder of daniel pearl
maulana masood azhar - floated a group that attacked Indian parliament and many other terror attacks in India
the 3rd one is a senior functionary who heads training establishment of a terror group.

I hope US took all factors into due consideration. at least India had the excuse of the lives of scores of innocent people. releasing as many as 5 for a soldier who turned his back on his own force (and may be country) sounds excessive.
if these people become responsible for more lives in future this decision would look very stupid.

pardon the crass language in the pic, got it from twitter.
BpFDBy_IgAADZgf.jpg
 
On Excalibur:

Posted on InsideDefense.com: May 30, 2014

The Excalibur Increment lb -- a GPS-guided, precision, 155 mm artillery projectile -- wrapped up initial operational test and evaluation earlier this year, demonstrating accuracy better than required, according to the Army's Excalibur product manager.

Lt. Col. Joshua Walsh told Inside the Army in a May 29 statement that the IOT&E was executed by soldiers who were provided with a tactical scenario and employed both conventional artillery munitions that were non-GPS-guided and the Excalibur munition. The test was held at Yuma Proving Ground, AZ, from Jan. 30 through Feb. 7.

"The projectile improves the ranges of cannon artillery from approximately 30 kilometers to 40.5 kilometers while providing the Army the ability to achieve less than two meters of miss distance on the average [versus] 50 meters with conventional artillery projectiles," Walsh said.

The average miss distance of a conventional or "dumb" munition is between 50 to 300 meters on the first round, Walsh noted, "depending on the range to the target." The accuracy requirement for Excalibur lb is 10 meters "Circular Error Probable with respect to the aim point," he said. By hitting regularly within two meters of the target, Walsh stated, the munitions are "performing better than required." As a cannon-fired artillery munition, "impacting the target within two meters of the aim point is not considered a 'miss,' and will indeed deliver the required effects on the targets," he added.

The program is "currently" meeting or exceeding all of its required key performance parameters and Army Test and Evaluation Command has "assessed that the projectile is safe for soldier use," according to Walsh. The program has completed all developmental and operational testing prior to full materiel release, he said, noting that the release would likely be achieved in mid-June. A full-rate production decision review with the Army acquisition executive is "currently" scheduled for June 25.

The Army completed final assembly of the last Increment la-2 Excalibur projectile and transitioned to building Inc. lb production versions in April, according to a statement from Picatinny Arsenal, NJ. More than 6,500 Inc. la rounds have been delivered. The new version is supposed to provide not only increased accuracy and reliability but also at a reduced cost, Walsh explained.

The Army is extending the production of Excalibur by at least a year. The program was slated to end in fiscal year 2014, but will be extended to FY-16 to meet the procurement objective, according to a Raytheon official. The company is the prime contractor for the Excalibur program.
 
Top