Jura The idiot
General
On AWACS:
Posted on InsideDefense.com: May 7, 2014
The House Armed Services Committee has moved to block the Air Force from retiring three E-3 Sentry aircraft and disbanding an associated reserve unit at Tinker Air Force Base, OK.
In an amendment to the panel's fiscal year 2015 defense authorization bill offered by Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) and narrowly adopted by the full committee today, the panel moved to block the service from obligating FY-15 funds to divest more than four E-3 Sentrys or to disestablish any units of the active-duty or reserve components associated with the fleet -- a reference to the 513th Air Control Group (513 ACG), which is a reserve associate unit of the 552nd Air Control Wing in Bridenstine's state.
If the committee's version of the bill becomes law, the amendment would prevent the Air Force from cutting the AWACS enterprise beyond the set limit until 15 days after it provides the congressional defense committees with a report certifying and explaining its ability to meet the "priority requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands relating to such aircraft," the amendment's text states.
The Air Force's AWACS fleet is undergoing platform modernization and upgrade to Block 40/45 mission system configuration. To pay for that effort the service's FY-15 budget request proposes retiring seven aircraft and disbanding the 513 ACG at Tinker AFB -- the only reserve AWACS unit. The service also wants to stand up an E-3G organic software depot maintenance facility at the same base.
During debate on the amendment, Bridenstine said NATO's deployment of E-3s to monitor the ongoing crisis in Ukraine highlights the need for the AWACS capability. Those aircraft, like the Air Force's AWACS, are designed to monitor airspace, alert command units to airborne threats and coordinate a response.
"Ukraine demonstrates that combatant commanders are increasing their requirements for AWACS," he told lawmakers during the mark-up session on Wednesday. "Can the Air Force meet those requirements with seven less aircraft and no reserve squadron? The answer is no."
He said the AWACS operators and air crews of 513 ACG have double the experience of their counterparts in the active-duty component, having flown the aircraft in support of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. He also noted that the unit is comprised of twice the number of craftsmen and superintendent-level maintainers.
The service's plan to disband the unit goes against the recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force, which calls for more reliance on the reserve component "to provide a quick, reversible way to generate manpower cost savings," Bridenstine said.
He also said that because of the plan to retire seven aircraft, the AWACS modernization program reported a major Nunn-McCurdy cost breach. According to a summary of the Defense Department's latest Selected Acquisition Report, published in April, the program experienced unit-cost growth of about 22 percent in FY-13 primarily because fewer aircraft would receive the upgrades.
If enacted, the amendment will cost almost $40 million to implement. That money will be drawn from a line item in the Air Force's procurement account for initial spare and repair parts, which Bridenstine said does not impact readiness because the money is already being programmed away from that account.
The amendment was opposed by House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-WA). He said the service's proposal was a "tough choice" to avoid costs further down the line.
"These are the types of decisions we have to make now to make sure that we have enough money to do what we need to do in the future," he said. "And standing up to every single decision the Department of Defense makes in opposing their cuts pushes us down the road towards a hollow force."
The amendment cuts $39.6 million from the Air Force's procurement account and adds $12.9 million for other procurement, $14.6 million for operation and maintenance spending and $12.2 million for military personnel.
There are 31 AWACS aircraft operated by Air Combat Command and the Pacific Air Forces. The Air Force wants to keep only 24 of those aircraft and modernize 21. The text of the amendment does not direct the Air Force to modernize the additional three aircraft.
Posted on InsideDefense.com: May 7, 2014
The House Armed Services Committee has moved to block the Air Force from retiring three E-3 Sentry aircraft and disbanding an associated reserve unit at Tinker Air Force Base, OK.
In an amendment to the panel's fiscal year 2015 defense authorization bill offered by Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) and narrowly adopted by the full committee today, the panel moved to block the service from obligating FY-15 funds to divest more than four E-3 Sentrys or to disestablish any units of the active-duty or reserve components associated with the fleet -- a reference to the 513th Air Control Group (513 ACG), which is a reserve associate unit of the 552nd Air Control Wing in Bridenstine's state.
If the committee's version of the bill becomes law, the amendment would prevent the Air Force from cutting the AWACS enterprise beyond the set limit until 15 days after it provides the congressional defense committees with a report certifying and explaining its ability to meet the "priority requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands relating to such aircraft," the amendment's text states.
The Air Force's AWACS fleet is undergoing platform modernization and upgrade to Block 40/45 mission system configuration. To pay for that effort the service's FY-15 budget request proposes retiring seven aircraft and disbanding the 513 ACG at Tinker AFB -- the only reserve AWACS unit. The service also wants to stand up an E-3G organic software depot maintenance facility at the same base.
During debate on the amendment, Bridenstine said NATO's deployment of E-3s to monitor the ongoing crisis in Ukraine highlights the need for the AWACS capability. Those aircraft, like the Air Force's AWACS, are designed to monitor airspace, alert command units to airborne threats and coordinate a response.
"Ukraine demonstrates that combatant commanders are increasing their requirements for AWACS," he told lawmakers during the mark-up session on Wednesday. "Can the Air Force meet those requirements with seven less aircraft and no reserve squadron? The answer is no."
He said the AWACS operators and air crews of 513 ACG have double the experience of their counterparts in the active-duty component, having flown the aircraft in support of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. He also noted that the unit is comprised of twice the number of craftsmen and superintendent-level maintainers.
The service's plan to disband the unit goes against the recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force, which calls for more reliance on the reserve component "to provide a quick, reversible way to generate manpower cost savings," Bridenstine said.
He also said that because of the plan to retire seven aircraft, the AWACS modernization program reported a major Nunn-McCurdy cost breach. According to a summary of the Defense Department's latest Selected Acquisition Report, published in April, the program experienced unit-cost growth of about 22 percent in FY-13 primarily because fewer aircraft would receive the upgrades.
If enacted, the amendment will cost almost $40 million to implement. That money will be drawn from a line item in the Air Force's procurement account for initial spare and repair parts, which Bridenstine said does not impact readiness because the money is already being programmed away from that account.
The amendment was opposed by House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-WA). He said the service's proposal was a "tough choice" to avoid costs further down the line.
"These are the types of decisions we have to make now to make sure that we have enough money to do what we need to do in the future," he said. "And standing up to every single decision the Department of Defense makes in opposing their cuts pushes us down the road towards a hollow force."
The amendment cuts $39.6 million from the Air Force's procurement account and adds $12.9 million for other procurement, $14.6 million for operation and maintenance spending and $12.2 million for military personnel.
There are 31 AWACS aircraft operated by Air Combat Command and the Pacific Air Forces. The Air Force wants to keep only 24 of those aircraft and modernize 21. The text of the amendment does not direct the Air Force to modernize the additional three aircraft.