US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

...
Well this answer the question I was debating with someone.

I think it was Bltizo, on Saturday (morning in my case -- I followed that discussion on-line heheh) three weeks ago :)
and I think your point was there should significant space/weight savings comparing to the shells for Mark 45 5". Correct? :)

Look at the size of those rounds, it's basically half the size of 5" rounds.
I wonder how rapid this railgun can shoot a minute.

Did you find out?
 
On Grey Eagle:

Posted on InsideDefense.com: April 25, 2014

The Army is implementing several changes to the Gray Eagle unmanned aircraft system to address potential cost and schedule risks related to design alterations and supplier base issues, with follow-on test and evaluation expected in the summer of 2015, according to the service's unmanned aircraft systems project office.

The Government Accountability Office, in its recent annual report on major weapon programs, noted that the Army was considering changing the Gray Eagle aircraft's tail, "which would be costly and require retrofitting the entire fleet." GAO added that a "production readiness review conducted in support of the program's full-rate production decision identified several high-risk supplier base issues that pose uncertainty for the program's cost and schedule."

The current tail on the Gray Eagle aircraft "does not have any inherent issues," an April 18 statement from the Army's UAS project office reads. "The servo malfunction found early in Gray Eagle development was corrected with a software change and it has never recurred." While the goal was "to move to a more robust tail design and longer life tail servo," the statement notes, "after reviewing the performance and reliability data of the current tail, which has over 150,000 flight hours, the Army decided the current design is sufficient and not worth the investment to redesign, integrate, test, and retrofit the Gray Eagle fleet."

In addition to the legacy engine supplier filing for bankruptcy, the Army is working to resolve another supplier base issue with Ice Management System, the vendor that provides the de-icing system on the aircraft, according to the statement. "The vendor notified General Atomics, our primary industry partner, of their impending bankruptcy. General Atomics has been working with the IMS sub-contractor to continue to meet production schedule requirements," the statement reads.

The service had to initiate an effort to test a Lycoming-made engine as an alternative because the German company supplying engines for Gray Eagle -- Thielert -- went bankrupt before being sold to a Chinese company. General Atomics obtained the intellectual property underpinning the Thielert engine because the company was interested in maintaining it, Col. Timothy Baxter, the service's UAS project manager, said last year (ITA, Sept. 6, 2013).

The Army is also designing the Universal Ground Control System that will be capable of controlling both Gray Eagle and Shadow UAS. The move "requires significant software and hardware compared to the One System Ground Control Station," the statement notes. The changes were made to increase commonality between Shadow and Gray Eagle, it adds. The Army was able to save "significant development and test dollars" by taking much of the Shadow UAS development efforts for the UGCS and Universal Ground Data Terminal, according to the statement. "The goal is to have a common UGCS/UGDT that will be able to fly both aircraft, thus reducing the logistics and soldier training burden in the future," the document notes.

The Army is "well on our way with UGCS integration and test in preparation for the follow-on test and evaluation scheduled for the summer of 2015," the service says. The Army has also implemented improvements based on recommendations formulated following the initial operational test and evaluation in fiscal year 2012. These improvements will be made at the FOT&E, the document states.

Some of those changes include "software changes that improve human factors through simplified Menu Graphic User Interfaces (GUI), simplified checklist procedures to reduce time to pre-flight, more automated pre-flight checks and adding radio volumes controls for each radio in the Ground Control Station," the statement reads.

The IOT&E showed that the OSGCS could be tweaked to improve operator efficiency and reduce stress levels. Operators were unable to control the volumes on any radios in the station, resulting in numerous occasions in which air traffic control radios would drown out tactical radios. Additionally, a 191-step checklist for start-up procedures in the station took two hours to work through. Climate control was also a problem: To keep the equipment cool enough to run inside the station, operators needed to wear hats, gloves and cold-weather gear in hot weather environments (ITA, Jan. 31, 2013).

The Army is also preparing to demonstrate Link 16 -- a tactical data link -- during the FOT&E. The GAO report noted that Link 16 "is the most significant remaining requirement to satisfy the Net-Ready [key performance parameter]." The requirement "has previously been deferred because of an incomplete Army communication infrastructure," the report notes.

The service "decided early in the development to defer the Link 16 capability until FOT&E to leverage Link 16 message sets being developed by the Army's Patriot [air and missile defense] System, thus saving the Gray Eagle program $5 million in development costs," the statement notes. The integration of Link 16 is complete and certification is "underway," the statement adds.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
I think it was Bltizo, on Saturday (morning in my case -- I followed that discussion on-line heheh) three weeks ago :)
and I think your point was there should significant space/weight savings comparing to the shells for Mark 45 5". Correct? :)

Correct.

Did you find out?

Nope. I am speculating that intervals between rounds depends on the velocity of rounds they fire since I don't think they have only one velocity setting for firing the rounds.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
It's official
Bell receives stop work order for Kiowa upgrades
By: JON HEMMERDINGERNASHVILLE Source: in an hour
Bell Helicopter has received an order to stop work on cockpit and sensor upgrades for the US Army’s Bell OH-58F Kiowa Warrior, the company says. The announcement comes as the service moves forward with plans to retire the OH-58 fleet.
“We did receive official notification of stop work on the OH-58F programme from the US Army in the first quarter” of 2014, Bell chief executive John Garrison said on 5 May.

The army’s $1.98 billion cockpit and sensor upgrade programme (CASUP) had called for modifications that would convert OH-58D models to the F model, allowing the service to operate Kiowa Warriors through 2025. The work would have replaced the type’s mast-mounted sensor with a new nose-mounted Raytheon common sensor.


Garrison made his comments during a media breakfast in Nashville, Tennessee, prior to the start of the Army Aviation Association of America’s Mission Solutions Summit.

The US Army’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal calls for the service to retire its entire fleet of single-engined OH-58 armed scouts and related TH-67 Creek trainers.

Under the plan, which requires Congressional approval, the army would transfer the Kiowa mission to Boeing AH-64 Apache attack helicopters and conduct training on more-advanced twin-engined Airbus Helicopters UH-72 Lakotas. The army would buy 100 more Lakotas as part of that transition plan.

Garrison reiterated Bell’s position that single-engined trainers are ideal for beginner pilots.

“Despite what has been said about the need for two-engined trainers, most of the world still believes that single-engined trainers are a great way to start,” he says.

A few minutes after Garrison’s remarks, army Vice Chief of Staff Gen John Campbell stressed the service’s intention to execute the plan, saying the army’s future will involve “manned and unmanned Apaches and UAVs.”

Campbell made the comment during an opening speech to convention attendees.

Garrison says Bell is interested in pitching its models as trainers if the plan moves forward and if the service decides to hold a trainer competition.

He calls Bell’s 505 Jet Ranger X, a civilian model under development, a good option for an army trainer.

“We think the 505 would compete very favourably as an initial training helicopter,” Garrison says. “Training helicopters are a big market.”

Bell would likely compete with AgustaWestland, which last week said its AW119Kx civilian helicopter would be a “common-sense solution” as a military trainer.

First phase of B-2 weapon software upgrade complete: Northrop Grumman
By: JON HEMMERDINGERWASHINGTON DC Source: Flightglobal.com in an hour
Northrop Grumman has completed a review of weapon systems software that will replace older programmes on the US Air Force’s fleet of B-2 bombers.

The software will better control the B-2’s weapons delivery system and allow new weapons to be integrated into the aircraft, Dave Mazur, Northrop’s vice president and B-2 programme manager, tells Flightglobal.

The project, which the USAF calls its Flexible Strike programme, seeks to replace multiple 1980s-era weapons software programmes with a single, new software programme, says Mazur.

“We are jumping from 1980s technology to current-day processors,” he says.

The software is called an “operational flight programme” and communicates with equipment that holds and releases weapons, says Northrop. The company has now completed the first phase of the programme – the preliminary design review phase.

The second phase will involve flight testing the new software in the aircraft, says Northrop.

The project comes on the heels of other recent B-2 electronics upgrades, including the addition of ultra high frequency satellite communication equipment, faster processors, a fibre-optic network and increased onboard storage, Northrop says.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Boeing delivered the 100th EA-18G Growler to the U.S. Navy

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


As Boeing announced the 100th delivery of the EA-18G to the US Navy on 5 May, McKeon proposed to add $450 million to next year’s budget for acquiring five more of the radar jamming aircraft.

5 for FY 2015

Current order is for 114, USN want 22 in more for her or replace USMC EA-6B no clear ? in more USMC depends of USN administratively/for bugdet... to follow.
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Those 22 more Growlers are Navy birds. The USMC has not announced any plans for EA18G and and is in full frontal assault for F35B and a limited number of F35C.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
This is an exercise of course. Seems like the F-16 is better at low speed (as told by the Danish pilot in the video) It used its 20mm Gatling Gun to take out Euro-fighter.

[video=youtube;RAedQ7FMiKo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAedQ7FMiKo[/video]

Time to market the F-16
 
Some Air Force News:

Posted on InsideDefense.com: May 6, 2014

The Air Force will not achieve the level of long-term savings it hopes for if the House Armed Services Committee's version of the fiscal year 2015 defense authorization bill -- including a provision to save the U-2 spy plane from retirement -- is enacted.

Recent statements by service officials, including Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh, have warned of deep cuts to readiness, force structure and modernization if Congress rejects force-structure changes in the Pentagon's FY-15 budget request, such as the retirement of the A-10 and U-2 fleets and the "right-sizing" of the mobility fleet -- which would involve the retirement of some older C-130s and C-5s. During the roll-out of the budget request in March, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned that the department would also retire its KC-10s and RQ-4 Global Hawk Block 40s if full sequestration returned in FY-16.

But the committee's mark-up, released Monday, would protect the U-2 and KC-10 fleets and allow only the single-mission A-10s to be retired if the aircraft are stored in a near-flyaway condition.


The mark would prohibit the Air Force from obligating funds to "make significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place U-2 aircraft in storage" or "divest or transfer, or prepare to divest or transfer, any KC-10 aerial refueling aircraft."

According to language in the proposed bill, which the House Armed Services Committee will debate on Wednesday, the panel is concerned that retiring the U-2s will result in a high-altitude intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capability gap. The mark supports the Air Force's plan to fund major sensor and platform improvements to the Global Hawk Block 30 fleet, which performs the same mission as the manned U-2 fleet, but calls for the development of a transition plan that provides combatant commanders with "equal or greater" ISR capability.

The service's 283 A-10s must be placed in so-called type-1000 storage, which the committee defines as "the storage of a retired aircraft in a near-flyaway condition that allows for the aircraft to be recalled into use by the [active-duty] or reserve components." The Air Force estimates it will save approximately $4.2 billion over the next five years by retiring the A-10s.

The mark-up will not block the retirement of older C-130s or C-5s, but it does support C-130 modernization efforts.

In March, Inside the Air Force asked Welsh where else the service would cut if Congress forced it to keep the platforms its wants to retire.

"We'll either have to get rid of other fleets, or we'll have to stop training," he said. "It's coming out of readiness, force structure or modernization -- that's where the cuts are coming from."

One place the Air Force might look for savings is the Global Hawk Block 40 fleet, which supports an airborne communications node mission and provides ground moving target indication. Several Air Force officials have suggested divesting those 11 aircraft because they comprise a small fleet that performs a specialized mission -- a mission already covered by the E-8 Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System.

The mark does, however, protect the KC-10s to mitigate against any potential impact sequestration might have on the KC-10 Stratotanker fleet in the future. According to language in the mark-up, U.S. Transportation Command has a strategic requirement for 567 aerial refueling aircraft, whereas the Air Force only has 454 tankers in its inventory.

The mark would not block the Air Force's plan to retire some E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System and EC-130H Compass Call aircraft to pay for ongoing mission-system modernization efforts on those platforms.

The committee does call into question the service's plan to reduce the number of operationally available JSTARS platforms in FY-16 from 16 to 11 aircraft to pay for a multibillion-dollar recapitalization effort, and a provision directs the Air Force to provide defense and intelligence committees with a report on the department's requirement for the moving target indication mission by Feb. 16, 2015.

Funding

If enacted, the authorization legislation would add $125.5 million to the Air Force's requested topline for research and development, resulting in a total spending authority of $23.9 billion, and cut $64 million from the service's $16.7 billion procurement request. The committee fully funds the Air Force's military construction request for the active-duty, Guard and Reserve components, but cuts requested operation and maintenance funding by $195 million -- mostly because of contract reductions.

The biggest changes to the research and development programs include the addition of $220 million to kick-start development of a first-stage rocket engine that would eventually replace the Russia-made RD-180, which United Launch Alliance buys for its Atlas V launch vehicles. The committee would also take $34 million from the Weather System Follow-on program and realign that money to support the launch of the DMSP-20 military meteorological satellite.

The committee's authorization bill would cut $29.4 million from the B-2 research and development program due to a delay with Flexible Strike -- a phased program that aims to improve the bomber's software and weapons carriage capabilities.

The committee's mark-up adds $3.5 million for a new Ejection Seat Reliability Improvement Program, an effort to develop a safer ejection seat for the Air Force's bomber and fighter aircraft. The panel expresses concern about the safety and reliability of current ejection seats, which were built in the 1970s. The committee also adds $7 million to the service's procurement account for initial installation of upgraded ejection seats.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sikorsky wins presidential helicopter award
May. 7, 2014 - 09:39PM |
0 Comments

A
A
Sikorsky VH-92 helicopter
Concept of the Sikorsky VH-92 helicopter for the US Government Executive Transport mission. (Matt Grasso / Sikorsky)

By Aaron Mehta
Staff writer
FILED UNDER
News
Military Technology
WASHINGTON — The Navy has officially selected Sikorsky to develop the next-generation of presidential helicopters.

The contract, a $1.2 billion deal, covers the engineering and manufacturing development phase of the Presidential Helicopter Replacement program. The EMD phase calls for the procurement of six test aircraft and two simulators, with an October 2020 completion date.

Sikorsky plans to deliver 21 aircraft to the Marines by 2023; $42 million for fiscal 2014 is being awarded to start the program immediately.

The Sikorsky design, a modified version of its S-92 helicopter, will also feature work by Lockheed Martin. Work will primarily be performed at Sikorsky’s Stratford, Connecticut, plant, although facilities in Owego, New York, and Coatesville, Pennsylvania, will also receive some work.

The selection of Sikorsky is hardly a surprise, as the rotorcraft giant was the only bidder on the program. Although the Navy had publicly said it desired competition for the contract, teams from Northrop Grumman-AgustaWestland and Bell-Boeing declined to bid after studying the requirements. Defense News reported Tuesday that the selection was imminent.

The president is currently carried in Sikorsky-made VH-3D and VH-60N aircraft, something the company noted in its announcement of the award.

“We are honored by this news and the vote of confidence in the Sikorsky team and the proven S-92 platform,” Sikorsky President Mick Maurer said in a company statement. “For 57 years, our company has been trusted with the critical responsibility of building and supporting a safe and reliable helicopter fleet for the President of the United States. We are proud of our record and the bright future for our company. We stand ready to deliver the next Marine One, the world’s most advanced executive transport helicopter.”

A Navy spokesman did not immediately return a request for comment.

The Navy has been attempting to award the contract for the presidential helicopter, formally known as VXX, since the mid-2000s. Sikorsky lost the contract to a team of Lockheed and AgustaWestland in 2005, before requirements creep led to increased costs and the eventual cancellation of that contract in 2009. After some delay, the new competition began in November of 2012.
I still think they should have offered a pressurized Osprey.

Inside the Army's growing Arctic Circle mission
May. 7, 2014 - 05:59PM |

By Michelle Tan
Staff report Army times

Sgt. 1st Class Kevin Clark, a platoon sergeant with the 6th Engineer Battalion (Combat Airborne), snowshoes across the tundra May 1 in Deadhorse, Alaska. (Sgt. Edward Eagerton/Army National Guard)

Above the Arctic Circle, paratroopers from 2nd Engineer Brigade participate in Arctic Pegasus. (Staff Sgt. Mylinda DuRousseau/Army)

A UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter flown by pilots Chief Warrant Officer 4 Mike Michaud and Chief Warrant Officer 2 Cody McKinney, from the 1-207th Aviation Battalion, Alaska Army National Guard, flies over the Denali Range on April 30 en route to Deadhorse, Alaska. (Sgt. Edward Eagerton/Army National Guard)
With more than 70 pounds in his ruck and “bunny boots” on his feet, Staff Sgt. Kandom Moore jumped from the C-17 Globemaster and into the Arctic.

The jump into Deadhorse, Alaska, north of the Arctic Circle, was a first for Moore and his fellow paratroopers from the 6th Engineer Battalion, as they embarked on a three-day mission this month in some of the most hostile, cold and isolated terrain in the world.

“The mission was great for all of us,” said Moore, a squad leader in the 84th Engineer Support Company, a subordinate unit of 6th Engineer Battalion. “This is what we’re up here for. We always rehearse it, and it was good to implement what we’ve been training on.”

The Arctic Pegasus exercise took place May 1-3. It marked a continuation of U.S. Army Alaska’s efforts to hone its cold-weather skill sets. In February, about 40 paratroopers from 4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division jumped into Deadhorse for that unit’s first airborne operation north of the Arctic Circle.

Deadhorse is almost 500 miles north of Fairbanks in Alaska’s North Slope Borough. The 25 or so engineers from 6th Engineer Battalion actually got lucky — they enjoyed relatively calm winds and temperatures that ranged from about 30 degrees during the day to about zero at night. The guys from 4th BCT who jumped in February contended with temperatures of about 35 degrees below zero.

“We were all watching the weather for about a week out,” Moore said. “We hit it at perfect timing. It was relatively warm.”

The soldiers still had to fight the snow, however.

“Some pockets were two- to four-feet deep,” Moore said.

The soldiers used snow shoes to cover the terrain, while dressed in Generation III extreme cold weather equipment, vapor barrier boots (a.k.a. bunny boots or Mickey Mouse boots), balaklavas, and arctic mittens.

The 6th Engineer Battalion planned and put together Arctic Pegasus in two weeks, said Lt. Col. William Conde, the battalion commander.

“It was a great opportunity for us to showcase, to exercise and rehearse our Arctic skills up here in Alaska,” he said. “It’s pretty unique for us because we’ve got this in our backyard.”

Like 4th BCT, the 6th Engineer Battalion has an area of operations that stretches from the Arctic Circle to the southern reaches of the Asia-Pacific Region.

The Alaska National Guard is active in the state, often responding to downed planes or stranded snowmobilers, but the active Army could be called upon in unique circumstances or in cases of extreme emergencies or disasters, when additional first responders are needed.

In November 2010, soldiers from 6th Engineer Battalion were called to help recovery efforts after an F-22 Raptor crashed near Cantwell, Alaska, said Robert Reeves, the chief of plans and exercises for Army Alaska.

Last April, soldiers from the Northern Warfare Training Center in Alaska’s Black Rapids were called to help recovery efforts for a young snowmobiler who fell into a 200-foot crevasse, said Lt. Col. Alan Brown, the Army Alaska spokesman.

The soldiers also must train and plan for extreme temperature swings, “given the long-range capability of our airborne units,” Brown said.

A week before the 4th BCT jumped into Deadhorse in February, soldiers from the brigade parachuted in to participate in the Cobra Gold 2014 exercise in Thailand, where the temperatures spiked in the 90s with 90 percent humidity.

For the engineers, they had less than two weeks to prepare, and their sole practice jump was in 60-degree weather.

On May 1, about 13 paratroopers jumped into Deadhorse. The soldiers also dropped a Small Unit Support Vehicle, which weighs more than 10,000 pounds fully equipped, onto the drop zone. Another dozen or so soldiers were already on the ground or flown in by helicopter.

The next day, the soldiers flew by UH-60 Black Hawk, piloted by the Alaska Guard, to one of the pump stations on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System for an orientation, Conde said.

One highlight for the soldiers was flying over a herd of muskox.

“That was a pretty cool experience for the guys,” Conde said.

The exercise also allowed Army Alaska to grow its relationships with the Air Force, Alaska Guard and private organizations across the state, Brown said.

“There were 12 different organizations involved in the planning of this operation,” he said. “It’s important because part of our mission as a Pacific response force and Arctic response force is to do our missions in close collaboration with so many different agencies.”


Reeves said Arctic missions will continue.

“We’re building upon those skills that we really haven’t had an opportunity to practice over the last 10 to 12 years,” he said.

Audit: U.S. military ammo storage woes include Utah
May. 7, 2014 - 05:07PM |
0 Comments

A
A

The Associated Press
FILED UNDER
News
Military Technology
SALT LAKE CITY — Federal auditors say computer troubles and bad accounting practices are leading to inefficiency in the storage of U.S. military ammunition, including ammo stored in Utah at the Tooele Army Depot.

The General Accounting Office says in a new report that depots across the country have incompatible computer systems and other problems that prevent ammo from being tracked and shared.

The Salt Lake Tribune reports that in some cases, the accounting problems lead to ammunition being needlessly destroyed. That includes everything from .45-caliber bullets to missiles.

The GAO says it’s especially a problem at the Tooele Army Depot where staff must calculate storage space manually.

“Tooele officials said this process can often take up to a day,” the report said, “and, in the end, is still only an approximation of available space.”

The Department of Defense manages a stockpile of conventional ammunition valued at about $70 billion. A significant chunk of that is at the Tooele Army Depot.

It is the storage facility for the Army and much of the Department of Defense in the Western states and the Pacific. Most of the munitions are stored in concrete igloos built in the 1940s and 1950s. The Tooele Army Depot also destroys munitions deemed obsolete or otherwise unneeded.

According to Lt. Col Don Peters at Army public affairs, the Department of Defense has a $160 million annual budget for destroying munitions. In the current fiscal year, that money will pay to destroy 23.7 million items amounting to 82,700 tons of munitions.

Sam Dallstream, who works in Virginia at the munitions division for the Department of the Army, said the Army considers its options before destroying any weapons, from sharing it with other branches, to selling it or providing it as aid to a foreign military.

“We do make every effort to recycle, reuse or sell it before we destroy it,” Dallstream said.

The GAO report issued last week makes seven recommendations, including upgrading the Army accounting system and moving the Navy and Marines to the system. The Air Force already plans to join the Army system in 2017. The report also recommends requiring the Army to make annual reports on ammo available for redistribution or scheduled for disposal.
and just last week the DOD anouned it was going to destroy about 1.2 billion worth of ammo.
 
Top