US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
How many Burkes are forward deployed in total around the world? I mean like permanently like in Yokosuka Japan

Spain is also home to a USAF rapid reaction force for Africa equipped with V-22 and C130 after the Benghazi attacks
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
How many Burkes are forward deployed in total around the world? I mean like permanently like in Yokosuka Japan

Spain is also home to a USAF rapid reaction force for Africa equipped with V-22 and C130 after the Benghazi attacks

Yokosuka is the only other home port for Arliegh Burke's outside of the US..

Check this list.

Yokosuka, Japan;

USS Curtis Wilbur (DDG 54),
USS John S McCain (DDG 56),
USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62),
USS Stethem (DDG 63)
USS Lassen (DDG 82)
USS McCampbell (DDG 85)
USS Mustin (DDG 89)


In addition there are two Tico's homeported in Yokouska;

USS Antietam (CG 54)
USS Shiloh (CG 67)
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Are these lighter or heavier than the Hummer? It looks to be slightly smaller but more armored than the Hummer.

Stripped down hummer has a curb weight of about 5200 Lbs Flyer 4000 Lbs both those are based on the stripped down version. both Hummer and Flyer can be up armored
Flyer is much smaller.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
4 Burkes will be permanently forward deployed there. The USN is wanting more of a presence in the Med and to cut down on transatlantic transit. May save on logistics as well.

This forward deployment is also part of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) and NATO Missile Defense. (see my bolded text)

When I first joined the USn in 1971 because of the Cold War the USN had an over the top presence in the MED..

Two Carrier battle groups deployed at all times. That's right two.

Numerous DDs FFs, & subs deployed at all times. Of course the ships were deployed from east coast ports on a rotational basis. In addition the heavy Cruiser USS Springfield (CG-7) was homeported in Italy from 1970 to '73.. Also there was a sub tender supporting subs in Glasglow Scotland. Can't remember the name...
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
When I first joined the USn in 1971 because of the Cold War the USN had an over the top presence in the MED..

Two Carrier battle groups deployed at all times. That's right two.

Numerous DDs FFs, & subs deployed at all times. Of course the ships were deployed from east coast ports on a rotational basis. In addition the heavy Cruiser USS Springfield (CG-7) was homeported in Italy from 1970 to '73.. Also there was a sub tender supporting subs in Glasglow Scotland. Can't remember the name...

Yup.. With the end of the cold war and the partial dismantling of the once mighty Black Sea Fleet, USN somewhat lost focus in that part of the world but I'm glad they're beefing up CTF 60 again. With all the problems in the Mid East and resurgence of Russian naval power it behoofs the Sixth fleet to again have a halfway decent presence there!!

As to the sub tender the only one I know of is the Emory Island. She sails from Diego Garcia. She old but not sure if she is early 1970s old ;)
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
When I first joined the USn in 1971 because of the Cold War the USN had an over the top presence in the MED..

Two Carrier battle groups deployed at all times. That's right two.

Numerous DDs FFs, & subs deployed at all times. Of course the ships were deployed from east coast ports on a rotational basis. In addition the heavy Cruiser USS Springfield (CG-7) was homeported in Italy from 1970 to '73.. Also there was a sub tender supporting subs in Glasglow Scotland. Can't remember the name...

Yes the submarine tender was located at Holy Loch on the West Coast of Scotland at the mouth of the River Clyde covered by the landscape and easy access to deep water its why Faslane is home to the four Vanguard SSBN too

USN had 7 tenders and one floating dry dock rotating in and out from 1961 until 1992 thats 31 years

Today Prestwick is used by USAF occationally when transiting East
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



JHSV-Rail-Gun.jpg


Marine News said:
Fiscal austerity is here to stay, commented Rear Admiral Thomas Shannon, Commander of the United States Navy’s Military Sealift Command (MSC) while speaking at a meeting of the Washington, DC Propeller Club recently. “It’s our new reality.”

Despite this reality, global demand for US naval presence remains high. Maritime forces continue to face challenges and adversaries ranging from traditional roles such as counter-piracy and maintaining open trade routes to unique challenges such as the disposal of chemical weapons from Syria.

Meanwhile, “every week, without exception we are under attack.” notes Shannon.

MSC isn’t being fired upon in a literal sense. Admiral Shannon’s battles are political and budgetary in nature and he remarked that his influence on Capitol Hill carries significantly less weight than lobby groups representing high profile acquisitions like the Joint Strike Fighter, submarines, or Ford-class aircraft carriers.

But yet, Admiral Shannon’s fleet of MSC vessels may find themselves playing an increasingly vital role in future maritime operations around the globe.

Fortunately, the U.S. Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan Greenert seems to share his vision, according to his spokesman CAPT Danny Hernandez. Greenert notes that the world we live in today needs some slightly different vessels and platforms – some that are lower cost, innovative and effective – to augment forcible entry platforms.

“Ships of the future need to evolve a little bit,” said Greenert, “everything can’t be a cruiser or destroyer teemed with missiles, guns and everything.”

And why should they?

There are plenty of highly capable MSC black-hulled vessels crewed by U.S. mariners who graduate from institutions like the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy who have the experience, dedication, and desire to serve. The cost of these mariners and their vessels are a bargain when compared to operating expensive U.S. grey-hulled warships that typically have several times more personnel.

“We can do some pretty cool stuff off these black hulls,” commented Shannon.

The M/V Cape Ray, he notes, was transformed into a factory to destroy Syrian chemical weapons in a 60-day period. It departed last week from Norfolk to carry out its mission.

Perhaps instead of a maintenance facility, a hospital package could be added in order to transform the vessel into a hospital ship that can be sent to littoral areas unreachable by the current Comfort-class ships.

The Austal-built JHSV highlights the versatile nature of these black hulls. Recently embarked on her maiden deployment, a railgun will be installed by 2016 to demonstrate capabilities. Possibilities are endless when you consider the potential to utilize these vessels to launch unmanned vehicles.

Looking further to the future, it may even be possible to launch a F-35 Joint Strike Fighter from an Afloat Forward Staging Base (AFSB).

The key to it all Shannon says, is “get it out there.” “I don’t care what it was designed to do, I want creative ideas that show the U.S. military what these ships CAN do.”

New MSC ships like the MLP, AFSB, and JHSV have a range of mission possibilities limited only by the creativity of those developing the concept of operations for use. These ships are far more than ‘piers-at-sea’ and reflect a tremendous opportunity to take on missions like counter-piracy, special warfare, and reconnaissance, while more costly assets like destroyers perform sea control missions requiring their impressive – and expensive – array of combat systems.

In an era of fiscal austerity, it would be foolish not to fully utilize these very capable assets.

Also....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



[video=youtube;OmoldX1wKYQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmoldX1wKYQ[/video]
LaWS Test on Arleigh Burke destroyer, USS Dewey (DDG 105), off San Diego, April 2013

Big Future said:
A directed energy weapon or rail gun, however, might be able to offer an effective deterrent or ship defense system at a fraction of the cost of a missile.

The Navy is progressing with laser and rail gun technology. Senior Navy officials have routinely talked about plans for the service's Laser Weapons System, or LaWS, a high-energy, solid-state directed energy weapon slated to deploy this year aboard the USS Ponce, a transport dock.

"We're taking the laser weapon system prototype to sea this year. We are hoping to develop a system that we can produce and install aboard future warships," said Navy spokesman Chris Johnson.

The idea with LaWS is to deploy a low-cost, high-energy offensive and defensive weapon against a range of potential threats, including Unmanned Aircraft Systems, fast-attack boats and small-boat swarm attacks.

The Navy also plans to test a ship-mounted electromagnetic rail gun on Navy vessels, service officials said. The rail gun, which can hit ranges of 100 miles or more, uses electricity stored on the ship to generate a high-speed electromagnetic pulse sufficient to propel a kinetic energy warhead. The result is an inexpensive, high-impact and long-range offensive weapon, service officials said.

The Navy, which has been testing the rail gun at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Va., plans to integrate it aboard a ship by 2016.

The rail gun's hyper-velocity projectile can also be fired from standard Navy 5-inch guns as well as 155mm Howitzers, service officials said.

The DDG Flight IV program, now in its infancy, is planned as an upgrade to the Navy's current Flight III destroyer program slated to being construction in 2016. Overall, the Secretary of the Navy's long-range shipbuilding plan calls for construction of 22 Flight III DDGs, Vandroff explained.

Flight III destroyers will be engineered with a series of technological improvements when compared to the current Flight IIA ships. For instance, the Flight IIIs will be configured with a next-generation Air and Missile Defense Radar, or AMDR, a radar that is 30 to 35 times more powerful than existing ship radar systems, such as the current SPY-1D, he said.

"You can see something one-half the size and twice as far away," Vandroff added.
 
Top