TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
David Axe The Dr. Nick Riveria of defense issues.
David Axe??!! I mean ..really..
A better article from US Naval Institute.
I did not read the entire article in the link..
Ok,.. does this 3-4 carriers deployed include George Washington which is forward deployed to Yokosuka Japan?
Over the years the USN has changed CVN deployment cycles numerous.. And if a major contingency arise this new scheduled will be thrown for a loop.
And right now as of this moment there is only one CVN deployed away from CONUS..Harry S Truman.
Ok so the plan is a buisness jet class. Gulfstream, or may be a 737 short?USAF reveals plan to replace JSTARS with business jets by 2022
By: STEPHEN TRIMBLEWASHINGTON DC Source: 27 minutes ago
The US Air Force has taken the first step in a newly revealed, eight-year process to develop and field a business jet-sized replacement for the Northrop Grumman E-8C joint surveillance target attack radar system (JSTARS), although the project still has no approved funding.
The JSTARS Recapitalisation (Recap) programme seeks to achieve an initial operational capability in 2022 with a “more efficient airframe” in the business jet class. It will be acquired using separate contracts for developing the aircraft, the airborne sensor, battle management command and control (BMC2) system and a communications subsystem.
The USAF revealed the strategy in a request for information to suppliers interested in bidding for the BMC2 system. The document was posted online on 23 January by the Air Force Lifecycle Management Center's electronic systems division at Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts.
Missing from the document is any indication of the programme’s funding status. The USAF budget request for the fiscal year 2014 budget did not include any line items entitled “JSTARS Recap”, nor did Congress add funding for such a project in the approved FY2014 omnibus appropriations bill that passed earlier this month.
But the release of the request for information on the new BMC2 system may indicate the USAF intends to request funding to launch the overall JSTARS Recap programme in FY2015. If funded, the project would create a rare opportunity for the aerospace industry to win a developmental contract, with several potential candidates available to compete.
In the last decade, Boeing and Raytheon have challenged Northrop’s position, proposing or fielding aircraft with ground moving target indication (GMTI) capability: the heart of the JSTARS mission. Raytheon delivered five Sentinel R1 surveillance aircraft to the UK, which modify the Bombardier Global Express business jet to carry a Raytheon/BAE Systems synthetic aperture radar with a GMTI mode. Boeing, meanwhile, proposed a variant of the 737-based P-8A anti-submarine and maritime patrol aircraft with a similar, Raytheon-built radar.
The JSTARS mission of detecting ground targets at long range at night or in poor weather evolved in the late 1980s. Northrop supplied recently modified Boeing 707s, which played a starring role in Operation Desert Storm in 1991, when the aircraft detected a major Iraqi troop movement in the midst of a seemingly blinding sandstorm.
Replacing or upgrading the 60-year-old aircraft which comprise the ground surveillance fleet of 16 E-8Cs has been debated since the USAF cancelled the Northrop E-10A multisensor command and control aircraft in 2007.
Northrop proposed to re-engine the E-8C with Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219 turbofan engines, as well as perform sensor and structural upgrades. Boeing countered by offering the aerial ground surveillance variant of the P-8A. But a 2011 analysis of alternatives funded by the USAF recommended a different strategy. The study urged replacing the E-8C with a mix of business jet-sized sensor platforms augmented by the Northrop RQ-4 Block 40 Global Hawk fleet – an unmanned air system that carries the multiplatform radar technology insertion programme radar.
A year later, Gen Norton Schwartz – the USAF's then-chief of staff – said in Congressional testimony that the service could not afford to carry out the recommendations from the analysis of alternatives. The USAF also at that time was unable to fund the modernisation programme for the E-8Cs.
A 30-year forecast of airpower capability released by the US Department of Defense last year assumed that the E-8C fleet would remain in place over the next three decades, although the USAF has acknowledged the aircraft need several upgrades to keep flying beyond 2025.
The USAF’s stance appeared to shift dramatically last September, however. Gen Mark Welsh, who replaced Schwartz, signalled that replacing the E-8C has become a priority. In comments to reporters at the Air Force Association’s annual convention, Welsh identified the business jet-sized E-8C replacement as the service’s next-highest priority, after acquiring the Lockheed Martin F-35A, Boeing KC-46 tanker and developing a future long-range strike bomber.
But Welsh so far has not disclosed how the E-8C replacement project will be funded. The FY2015 budget request, which is still being assembled, is likely to have a lower top-line than this year’s enacted level, meaning that the USAF will have to pay for such a programme by taking funding away from another one.
US air traffic controllers discuss challenges, solutions to UAS integration
By: JON HEMMERDINGERWASHINGTON DC1 minutes ago
Integrating unmanned air systems (UAS) into civil airspace in the United States is one of the toughest jobs the nation's aviation industry has ever faced, according to the leader of the Air Traffic Control Association (ATCA) trade body.
The group held a UAS-focused conference on 24 January near Washington, DC, during which attendees detailed many of the issues they say must be overcome before UAS become common in US skies.
“Integrating UAS is the hardest thing we have ever done,” Peter Dumont, president of ATCA, says.
He likens the problems posed by the booming UAS industry to those caused by the widespread introduction of jet-powered aircraft in the middle of last century, only “more difficult.”
The challenges are both practical and regulatory, requiring both technological advances and a host of new certification standards for aircraft, systems and pilots, Dumont says.
Speakers at ASTA’s event - the first of its kind held by the group - included representatives from the FAA, the US military and private industry.
Chris Smith, who works at air traffic control management company Serco, noted that UAV pilots often have a restricted view of airspace.
Visual identification of other aircraft - the “see and avoid” principle - can be “difficult from computer screens,” says Smith, whose company manages air traffic, including US military UAVs, at the Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, California.
Responses to air traffic control instructions by unmanned aircraft are also delayed, as messages must be relayed via operators on the ground before the necessary control inputs are made, says Smith.
Air traffic controllers must consider other factors when managing UAS traffic, Smith adds. For instance, small aircraft might be more affected by wake turbulence, and slower-moving UAS may need greater separation from faster manned aircraft.
Some of those concerns are familiar to Ted Schultz, who flies General Atomics MQ-9 Reapers for the US Air Force. Schultz told attendees that spotting other aircraft - both those in the air and on the ground - on monitors in an MQ-9 control station (below) can be difficult.
asset image
US Air Force
Also, he says actions that are simple to perform in a manned aircraft can be protracted tasks in some UAVs. For instance, he says, if an aircraft is ask to identify itself all the pilot has to do is push the "ident" button on the transponder.
But to undertake the same operation for an MQ-9, an operator must open a “tools” menu using a mouse and then find the identify command, he says.
Those steps take time and can be distracting, particularly while simultaneously manoeuvering the Reaper. “That’s just an example of many issues we deal with,” he says.
Mack Coker, who directed air traffic at a base in Iraq for the US military, says UAS created challenges because they flew pre-programmed flight paths.
Therefore, Coker says the AAI RQ-7 Shadow drones that operated from the base were kept in a “segregated” environment, operating from a dedicated runway.
“For five minutes [from takeoff] they flew GPS points out of our airspace. They were not flexible at all,” Coker says. “We kept all traffic out of their way, and it worked.”
Other concerns include the need for a UAS to be protected from hacking and the need to establish procedures to cope with a “lost link” between an air vehicle and its operator.
Paul McDuffee, vice president of government relations and strategy at UAV maker Insitu, says that unlike many other countries, the US has an “open skies”-style airspace. Its crowded with large commercial airliners and small private aircraft, he notes, which creates risks that are relatively unique to the US, he says.
Industry and air traffic controllers say problems can be solved, but much of the work lies with the FAA, which has embarked on a multi-year project to create a host of UAV regulations, including those covering pilot and aircraft certification.
The agency is required by the FAA Reauthorisation Act of 2012 to integrate UAS into US airspace by September 2015. Though some members of the industry credit the FAA for recent progress, there is a widespread belief that next year's deadline will be missed.
But Jim Williams, head of the FAA’s UAS integration office, expresses confidence in the agency’s progress and says it will fulfill its obligations. “We will integrate UAS in a measured and systemic manner,” he says.
One of the FAA’s first goals has been to publish a “small UAS’ rule that is expected to allow commercial flights of UAVs weighing less then 55lb (25kg).
asset image
Rex Features
Currently, commercial UAS flights are largely prohibited, except for a handful of companies who receive exemption from the restriction to conduct test or demonstration flights.
Though the small UAS rule was expected to be published years ago, progress has been slow.The FAA recently announced it will release its proposed rule in November 2014, to be followed by a period of public comments and then possible revision.
It’s a pace that McDuffee describes as “glacial.” Industry has speculated it may be another couple of years before the final rule is published.
Still, McDuffee sees progress. He says the FAA and the industry are collaborating better than ever and thinks the agency is now recognising it can safely open some areas of airspace to small UAVs.
In addition, McDuffee notes that committees established by standards setting organization ASTM International have nearly completed writing voluntary standards for small UAS.
Those documents will include standards covering flight manuals, maintenance and aircraft design and production, McDuffee says.
The Aviationist said:On Jan. 21, Dyess Air Force Base, in Texas, saw the arrival of the first operational B-1B Lancer with the Integrated Battle Station upgrade aircraft arrive which gives the “Bone” new screens and updated avionics in both the cockpit and battle stations.
The IBS is a package of three different upgrades that, in the words of Brig. Gen. Glen VanHerck, 7th Bomb Wing commander, who spoke at the ceremony held on Jan. 24 to celebrate the arrival of the first “new” plane, “will take the fleet to the next generation of long-range strike capability.”
The upgrade is aimed at increasing the situational awareness of the pilots and includes a Fully Integrated Data Link (FIDL), a Vertical Situation Display Upgrade (VSDU), and a Central Integrated System (CITS) upgrade.
Within the VSDU two unsupportable, monochrome pilot and co-pilot displays were replaced by four multifunctional color displays, that provide the pilots more situational awareness data, in a user-friendly format.
The FIDL is a modern data link that allows the B-1 to interconnect and communicate in real-time, with other planes, ground stations, allied units.
The CITS is an upgrade of the old LED display computers used by ground maintainers to identify and troubleshoot system failures.
“Integration into the data link environment and the increased maintainability, as well as the new computers and displays are capable of showing a better picture of the battlespace with more advanced graphics will enable the B-1 to be a force for decades to come,” said Maj. Michael Jungquist, 337th Test and Evaluation Squadron software Block 16 project officer for the Dyess Air Force Base press release.
The IBS upgraded B-1 bombers will not only be based at Dyess: Ellsworth AFB is also scheduled to receive the upgraded aircraft within the upgrade program, that will be completed by 2019.
Release Date: 1/28/2014 8:08:00 AM
WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The Department of Defense announced the deployment of M/V Cape Ray from Portsmouth, Va., Jan. 27.
M/V Cape Ray is the primary contribution of the Department of Defense toward international efforts to eliminate Syria's chemical weapons material program.
Over the last several months, hundreds of government and contract personnel have worked tirelessly to prepare the vessel to neutralize Syrian chemical materials and precursors using proven hydrolysis technology. This achievement could not have been possible without these remarkable contributions.
The United States remains committed to ensuring its neutralization of Syria's chemical materials prioritizes the safety of people, protects the environment, follows verification procedures of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), and with applicable standards. All waste from the hydrolysis process on M/V Cape Ray will be safely and properly disposed of at commercial facilities to be determined by the OPCW. No hydrolysis byproducts will be released into the sea or air. M/V Cape Ray will comply with all applicable international laws, regulations, and treaties.
It is the responsibility of the Assad regime to transport the chemical materials safely to facilitate their removal for destruction. The international community is poised to meet the milestones set forth by the OPCW, including the June 30 target date for the total destruction of Syria's chemical weapons materials. The United States joins the OPCW and the United Nations in calling on the Assad regime to intensify its efforts to ensure its international obligations and commitment are met so these materials may be removed from Syria as quickly and safely as possible.
(Note: I added a photo of the vessel to your post, popeye. Hope that was okay.)
(Note: I added a photo of the vessel to your post, popeye. Hope that was okay.)
This is good news.
I was wondering if the US Navy might add an escort vessel for this...I would think we would.
I guess we will find out later.
I will add that post to the thread about the overall mission too.
Sea Waves said:Bethpage NY January 28, 2014
Northrop Grumman Corporation has delivered the 100th airborne electronic attack (AEA) kit for the EA-18G Growler aircraft. The AEA kit is a critical component of the aircraft, which allows warfighters to target and attack the most complex enemy communication and air defense systems.
"This delivery milestone demonstrates the dedication of the Northrop Grumman team to the EA-18G Growler program. Every airborne electronic attack subsystem they have produced is of the highest quality, allowing us to stay ahead of current and evolving threats," said Capt. Frank Morley, U. S. Navy F/A-18 and EA-18G program manager.
The AEA kit features wing tip pods and gun bay pallets, in addition to antennas and receivers. The ALQ-218 Antenna/Tactical Jamming System Receiver allows for selective reactive jamming capability and accurate emitter identification, location and analysis. At the same time, the AN/ALQ-227 Communication Countermeasures Set/Electronic Attack Unit intercepts, processes and jams signals, while determining their direction.
"With the 100th delivery of the EA-18G AEA kit, we continue to provide a high-quality product to those who protect our nation each and every day," said Doug Shaffer, director, electronic attack/maritime systems integration programs, Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems. "We are proud to carry on the company's legacy in developing and producing world-class airborne electronic attack technology platforms."
The various AEA kit components are designed and manufactured at Northrop Grumman facilities in Bethpage, N.Y., St. Augustine, Fla., and Baltimore, Md., and by an expert supplier team. The 100th kit was formally delivered to the EA-18G prime contractor, Boeing, Nov. 26, a week ahead of the contract date.
The Growler is the newest and most advanced airborne electronic attack platform used by U.S. Armed Forces, NATO and coalition forces around the world. Since reaching full-rate production and initial operational capability in 2009, the work of these aircraft in the fleet has been notable, whether in Afghanistan, Iraq or Libya. In 2019, Growlers will have replaced all of the Northrop Grumman-built EA-6B Prowlers operated by the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. Once this happens, the EA-18G Growler will serve as the only Joint Force airborne electronic attack option.
Northrop Grumman has delivered all 100 AEA kits on time and on budget, demonstrating the company's commitment to its customers. In addition to the kit, Northrop Grumman also produces the center/aft fuselage and vertical tails of the EA-18G Growler.
I just love the BONE, like the A-26, classy and classic beauty, add the B-47 to that short list of beautiful bombers!
Sea Waves said:The decommissioned aircraft carrier Forrestal (AVT 59) is scheduled to begin its final voyage, Feb. 4, weather permitting, when it will depart Philadelphia on its way to a ship dismantling and recycling facility in Brownsville, Texas.
The ship will be towed down the Delaware River, along the eastern seaboard, and across the Gulf of Mexico to arrive at the All Star Metals facility. The best opportunit y for viewing the departure will be from publicly accessible areas along the Delaware River.
The Navy awarded a ship dismantling contract to All Star Metals of Brownsville on Oct. 22, 2013, and All Star Metals subcontracted with Foss Marine Towing to tow the ship to its final destination.
The first of the "supercarriers," Forrestal was launched Dec. 11, 1954, by Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Co., and commissioned Sept. 29, 1955.
Forrestal was decommissioned Sept. 11, 1993, after more than 38 years of service. On June 16, 1999, the Navy announced the ship would be available for donation to an eligible organization for use as a museum or memorial. However, no viable applications were received and the vessel was removed from donation hold in December 2003 and redesignated for disposal.
In October, the Navy competitively awarded a contract to All Star Metals for the towing, dismantling and recycling of conventionally powered aircraft carriers. Under the terms of the contract, the company will be paid $0.01 for dismantling and recycling ex-USS Forrestal, which is the lowest price the Navy could possibly have paid the contractor for the work.
The Navy continues to own the ship during the dismantling process until the ship has been fully dismantled. The contractor takes ownership of the scrap metal as it is produced and sells the scrap to offset its costs of operations.
Program Executive Office Littoral Combat Ships is responsible for delivering and sus taining the fleet's littoral mission capabilities. Consistent delivery of high-quality warfighting assets, while balancing affordability and capability, is key to supporting the Navy's Maritime Strategy.