US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
I heard that the French got the best tasting rations, they even have calamari on one of their MRE type packages. Now that's something I would like to try.

you could always join the French Foreign Legion, might get to play with some of those SCAR type weapons??? brat
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Lockheed Martin ready to answer US Navy’s next-generation targeting pod needs with the Sniper
Lockheed Martin’ Sniper pod is the most widely deployed targeting system for fixed-wing aircraft in use by the U.S. Air Force, and is the targeting system of choice for 16 international air forces. With a possible US Navy requirement in the near future for next-generation target pods, Lockheed Martin feels it has the right system to answer current and future needs.

Building on the technology of legacy ATP pods, Sniper pods in the new ATP-SE configuration provide an even greater capability via new enhanced sensors, a two-way data link, advanced processors and automated non-traditional intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance modes.

Navy Recognition had the opportunity to ask a few questions to Ken Fuhr, director of Fixed Wing Programs, from Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control regarding the Sniper Pod.
More + video at:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Pentagon Slows Ground Vehicle Purchases

By Michael Fabey

Source: Aerospace Daily & Defense Report
October 16, 2013
Credit: Lockheed Martin

The U.S. Army and Marine Corps are in no hurry to rebuild their ground fleets following the accelerated acquisition of vehicles capable of protecting troops from improvised explosive devices (IED) and related threats in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Such is the case as the services develop the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV), a program the Army shares with the Marine Corps, to replace the Humvee, which has been in service since 1985.

“They are being very deliberate,” says John Bryant, senior vice president of Defense Programs for Oshkosh Defense, which along with AM General and Lockheed Martin received JLTV Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contracts in August 2012, worth a total of $185 million for the program. The JLTV Technology Development contracts were awarded in October 2008 and the planned single, low-rate initial production contract is not scheduled until 2015.

Congress and defense analysts took the Pentagon to task for spending large sums of money to quickly ramp up production and deployment of mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles for Iraq, as well as other specially built vehicles for Afghanistan. But now the services are throttling back a little with JLTV, Bryant says, to make sure requirements and capabilities match up at a reasonable cost.

Right now government estimates put the research and development costs for a program to develop and buy 54,599 vehicles at about $497.1 million, while the procurement cost is estimated at about $22.2 billion, for a total funding package of about $22.7 billion.

Bryant says the JLTV program should fare well as it comes under scrutiny—like other major acquisition efforts—from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and Government Accountability Office (GAO). CRS notes there could be some congressional concerns over “reported possible JLTV budget shortfalls starting in fiscal 2015.”

Bryant also acknowledges there could be some funding issues later in the program associated with sequestration. And, as GAO points out, JLTV will have to battle it out with other major ground-related Army programs.

“The Army plans to move ahead with the procurement of JLTV at about the same time that it plans to start the procurement of other new and costly programs like the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV),” GAO says. “The procurement of all three programs is expected to continue for a decade or more.”

The AMPV fleet is the proposed replacement for the M113 family of vehicles in the heavy brigade combat team, focusing on five missions: general purpose; medical evacuation; medical treatment; mortar carrier; and mission command. The proposed Army AMPV buy runs higher than 3,100 vehicles.

The first GCV variant is intended to be the service’s next infantry fighting vehicle, replacing a portion of the current M2 Bradley fleet. The total GCV program price tag is estimated at $37.9 billion, with $7 billion of that needed for research and development and $25.4 billion for procurement.

The Army needs about 30 development models and plans to buy 1,874 production models, according to defense analysts’ estimates.
JLTV is the fallow on to the hummer you may remember that a Chinese company bought the civilian hummer brand.
AMPV offerings include turret less Bradleys and Tracked strykers.
GCV is in one version weighing in as heavyer then the Abrams' MBT.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
USS Zumwalt is ready to launch.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Now that is advanced naval ship building and technology.

It represents a critical advancement in naval technology and is a lethal vessel. It is the type of thing with its AGS, PVL, New Radars, advanced stealth, new Sonars, Integrated Power System, etc. that makes it very difficult for any adversary. And, it is ready and designed for the naval lasers and naval rail guns already field testing and coming online in the next 5-10 years.
 
Last edited:

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Good news here!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Pentagon on Friday said it will reinstate the Navy’s Blue Angels and Air Force Thunderbirds flying teams, port visits, service weeks and band appearances, but at 45 percent of what the public outreach effort used to be.

The reduction will save $104 million in the current fiscal year, according to a Defense Department release. Many of these activities were canceled entirely in the prior fiscal year due to federal budget cuts known as sequestration.

The Navy will return the Blue Angels and the Leap Frogs parachute team to their full schedules, said Lt. Cmdr. Courtney Hillson, a Navy spokeswoman at the Pentagon.

Also back on the Navy calendar: Fleet Weeks in San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Portland and Port Everglades, Fla. Also approved are Navy Weeks in Baltimore, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, Omaha, Dallas and Mobile, Ala.

Navy ships will make outreach port visits in Baltimore, Mobile, New Orleans, Tampa, Savannah, New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Camden, Maine.

Navy band tours and performances are also back on.

"We'll be able to execute community relations in a way that ensures Americans, outside of fleet concentration areas, have the opportunity to see and connect with the Navy," Hillson said.

What does the Pentagon's announcement mean for the Miramar Air Show, canceled abruptly this month due to the federal government shutdown? No word yet. A Marine Corps spokeswoman late Friday said that five air shows have been approved but she wasn't able to provide specifics.

"We look forward again to have the opportunity to interact with our neighbors on and off our installations with these approved outreach events and give back to the American people for their continued support," said Capt. Maureen Krebs, a spokeswoman at Marine Corps headquarters.

Narrowly avoiding the air show's fate, San Diego Fleet Week was held last month, but with a slimmed down schedule that did not include a traditional open house featuring ships from San Diego Naval Base. The public was able to tour the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan because it was in port during the Speedfest event at North Island Naval Air Station.

San Diego is noticeably absent from the Navy's new Fleet Week list. This region is considered a "fleet concentration area."

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel outlined the Pentagon's new approach to community outreach in an internal memo to the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines and other military leaders, according to released information.

"It is unfortunate that sequestration restrictions have kept us from connecting with nearly a half-billion people worldwide over the last six months, and required us to withdraw support from more than 2,800 events throughout the country," the secretary wrote.

The full list of what’s being reinstated at a reduced level: jet and parachute demonstration teams, band and ceremonial unit appearances, port visits, service weeks, and nonprofit and corporate leader outreach.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Karem Tiltrotor A Contender For Army Utility Role
By Graham Warwick
Source: Aviation Week & Space Technology

October 14, 2013
Credit: Karem Aircraft Concept
When the Pentagon set out its Future Vertical Lift (FVL) strategy to develop a family of advanced rotorcraft to replace its fleets of helicopters originally designed in the 1960s and '70s, one goal was to engage non-traditional suppliers to bring more innovation into the sector.

With the inclusion of two startup companies among the four teams awarded contracts for the U.S. Army's Joint Multi-Role technology demonstration (JMR TD), the Defense Department has taken a step toward that goal. Bell Helicopter and a Sikorsky/Boeing team may still be the favorites to fly two high-speed rotorcraft demonstrators in 2017, but they face real competition from two relative unknowns.

AVX Aircraft had already declared its hand, previously unveiling the 230-kt. coaxial-rotor, ducted-fan compound helicopter it is designing for JMR. But Karem Aircraft was not confirmed as a contender until Oct. 2, when the Army announced the four cost-sharing technology investment agreements for the $217 million JMR TD Phase 1 flight demonstration.

Karem Aircraft was formed in 2000 by Abe Karem, designer of the Predator unmanned aircraft and A160 Hummingbird unmanned helicopter, to develop his optimum-speed tiltrotor (OSTR) concept. Along with the other teams, Karem now has $6.5 million and nine months to complete preliminary design of its JMR demonstrator, the TR36TD, after which the Army will select two designs to be built and flown.

Karem is saying little about the design, except that the demonstrator will have two 36-ft.-dia. variable-speed rotors, powered by existing turboshaft engines, and that a production version would be capable of 360 kt. in level flight—faster than Bell's 280-kt. V-280 “third-generation” tiltrotor and Sikorsky/Boeing's 230-kt. coaxial rigid-rotor, pusher-propulsor design.

But some insight into the OSTR design is available from Karem's private-venture work on the 90-seat AeroCommuter and 180-seat AeroTrain commercial tiltrotors, and concept studies of a large cargo rotorcraft, the TR75, performed from 2005-10 under the Army-led Joint Heavy Lift project. JMR is a smaller rotorcraft, the precursor to a planned replacement for the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk (see page 77).

The OSTR has long, light and stiff blades rigidly attached to the hub, which in turn is rigidly mounted to the nacelle—a lighter and less complex design than the articulated and gimballed hub on the Bell Boeing V-22. Instead of a swashplate and pitch links, the blades are individually controlled by electric actuators in the hub, saving weight and increasing reliability.

“Most designs let the rotor shake the aircraft then try to damp it. That is not a good concept,” says Karem. “We take the loads at the source—the blade—and do not make it flexible. And we do things with the blades as they go round so as not to create those loads. We need individual blade control, and also higher harmonic control.”

To optimize blade-loading and maximize propulsive efficiency in vertical and forward flight, rotor speed is reduced by at least 25%, and as much as 40% in some OSTR designs, between hover and airplane mode. Rather than redesign the power turbine to operate over such a wide speed range, Karem uses a multispeed gearbox to vary prop rpm while letting the engine run at its most efficient high speed.

Where the V-22 has a relatively short, thick wing to support the tilting rotors and avoid an aeroelastic instability known as whirl flutter, caused by oscillation of the nacelles, Karem notes the OSTR's light and stiff rotors delay whirl flutter and allow a longer-span, higher aspect-ratio wing for increased lift-to-drag ratio (3-4 times that of the V-22) and cruise efficiency in airplane mode. To reduce download from rotor downwash on the longer wing, the outboard wing extensions tilt with the nacelles.

Hingeless rotors provide high control authority, allowing Karem to shrink the size of the tail, which is V-shaped on the TR36TD, and reduce drag. The design uses the very high mast moments generated by the rigid rotors for pitch and directional stabilization and control, and in some OSTR designs, the tail area is just 18% of the wing area, compared with the V-22's 105%.

The blades, nacelles, wing and fuselage are made from lightweight, high-strength composite, which would be produced in large integrated pieces using out-of-autoclave processing, and Karem is projecting an empty weight 20-40% lower than the V-22's. He has patented a method of curing composites under tensile stress to increase the compressive strength of the blades and upper wing skins. Aircraft systems on a production OSTR would be all-electric.


Copyright © 2013, Penton
Bell switches engine supplier for next tiltrotor, chooses GE
Print
By: JON HEMMERDINGER WASHINGTON DC 09:09 16 Oct 2013 Source: Flight global

GE Aviation will manufacture the engines for Bell Helicopter’s third-generation tilt-rotor aircraft, the V-280 Valor, according to a media release from Bell.

Bell, a division of Textron, does not say which specific GE engine will power the V-280, and GE did not immediately respond to a request for more information.

But the release says government funding from the US Army’s future affordable turbine engine (FATE) programme will allow Bell to provide a “robust, durable engine.”

GE has told Flightglobal that technologies developed through FATE, such as advanced cooling systems, could be inserted directly into its 7,500shp-class (5,520kW) GE38 engine.

That engine will power Sikorsky’s CH-53K heavy lift helicopter, which is under development for the US Marine Corps.

The Rolls-Royce AE1107C Liberty engine powers the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey and competes in the same thrust-range as the GE38.

GE tells Flightglobal it has completed 3,100h of engine tests on the GE38 and expects the engine to receive full military certification sometime next year.

The CH-53K is expected to fly at the end of 2014.

Bell’s medium-lift V-280 Valor is seen as a replacement to the Army’s fleet of Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawks.

The V-280 will have a deployable range of up to 2,100nm (3,890km) and will be twice as fast as UH-60s, says Bell.

UH-60s have a maximum cruise speed of 151kt (280km/h), according to Sikorsky.
Well on the subject of Tiltrotors One step closer to Awacs.
USMC To Outfit Ospreys With Comms Node
By Amy Butler
Source: Aviation Week & Space Technology

October 14, 2013
Credit: USMC Sgt. Keonaona C. Paulo
Most white-collar workers cannot fathom operating without routine emails or news updates via a smartphone for even a few minutes, let alone an hour or more.

But, U.S. Marine Corps troops on aircraft en route to potentially dangerous landing zones for missions have to do just that, and in dire situations. Essentially, they fly blind, equipped with a set of mission plans that does not include live updates. And, they are doing this despite an unprecedented amount of data collection by unmanned aircraft and infrared missile-warning and targeting-pod systems proliferating around the battlespace.

Service officials intend to change that dynamic by fielding a new communications gateway onboard the MV-22 by early next year. It will allow the aircrew onboard the tiltrotor and troops flying in the back to have improved, real-time situational awareness for missions.

This is the latest nontraditional use of the tiltrotor troop and cargo hauler, 360 of which are being purchased by the service. Already, the Marine Corps has begun trials to test the Bell/Boeing MV-22's aerial refueling capability, allowing for the service to pass fuel to other attack and assault support aircraft, potentially without relying on land-based KC-130s.

The gateway project is an interim step, however. Ultimately, the Marine Corps wants to place a Software Reprogrammable Payload (SRP) radio set on all V-22s, with an eye toward eventually outfitting the entire aviation fleet. The ultimate plan calls for these radios to support an airborne network designed to link aviators and troops—those on the ground or riding in the back of airborne platforms—to real-time information on the battlefield.

In the meantime, the Corps is conducting the second major test of the interim gateway this month during a series of Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) trials at a Weapons and Tactics Instructor course at Marine Corps AS, Yuma, Ariz. The first took place during a similar course in April, says Maj. Sam Clark, a pilot for VMX-22, an operational test and evaluation squadron operating the Osprey.

He participated in the trials; they were a first-of-a-kind test for the V-22 and were used to demonstrate that the tiltrotor can function as a node on a larger network.

The V-22 is an ideal platform for fielding both the interim and eventual SRP equipment because it is slated for wide use by Marine Expeditionary Units, small groups of personnel who operate onboard amphibious ships around the globe. Additionally, the aircraft is large enough for integration of various antennas needed for the many waveforms used by SRP.

The interim solution makes use of a hardware box originally developed to carry the Directed Infrared Countermeasures (Dircm) system, and outfitted with a variety of radios capable of communicating in various waveforms to create the gateway.

This is not unlike the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN) system hastily fielded by the U.S. Air Force on the Bombardier BD-700 and Northrop Grumman Global Hawk Block 20 aircraft to support operations in Afghanistan.

“What the Marine Corps is looking for is a more cost-effective, cost-efficient and more expeditionary method of something like that,” says Maj. Shawn Hoewing, lead officer for the Corps on this initiative. BACN “takes up the entire aircraft. We have condensed it down to one of each type of radio and then [added] the gateway software that allows you to do the message translation.”

Hoewing says the service plans this month to test a variety of functions using the interim gateway solution, including remote control of an unmanned aircraft sensor. Separately, last spring, operators also demonstrated remote control of an electronic warfare payload hosted in the gateway box; the controller was in California while the aircraft was flying in Arizona. During the April trials, situational awareness data provided through the gateway was available only to pilots in the Osprey's cockpit; this month, the tests will feature a tablet interface that can be passed to a troop commander in the back of the aircraft. This will provide data to enhance mission-planning en route.

The Marine Corps plans to field six of these gateways to a single Marine Expeditionary Unit early next year, Hoewing notes.

In the meantime, fielding of a more elegant SRP system is in the works. “The idea is to do this concurrently, so there is no gap in capability,” Hoewing says. With the gateway, the Marines hosted radios employing different waveforms—such as Link 16, TTNT and voice—in a single box on the aircraft. SRP would take that a step further by removing the individual radios and replacing them with a software reprogrammable system. He acknowledges SRP has a “sordid past,” having begun as an Office of Naval Research project to field an electronic warfare (EW) system. As an EW program, SRP “didn't give you enough bang for your buck.”

Earlier this year, the service refocused the program on serving as a communications node. “In the future, that is one box that hosts all of those waveforms,” Hoewing says. “A lot of people have software-defined radios. Generally, what they bring is the ability to carry one waveform at a time. . . . Having a multimodule, multiwaveform system capable of simultaneous operations—that is where it is key. When you include in there the gateway capability, now you are doing the translation for someone else when you arrive on the scene.”

With SRP, the Marines envision the V-22 and CH-53E (which is the second candidate platform) as nodes to pass information among fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft and troops on the ground.

This would allow a task force in the back of a V-22 to view a landing zone as imaged by the CH-53's infrared Dircm sensors, as an example, Hoewing says. It provides troops with real-time imagery of a landing zone to allow for necessary replanning en route. This could also allow for an intelligence analyst to retask an unmanned aircraft or its sensor from a desk miles away from its flightpath.

The Marines plan to begin fielding SRP to the V-22 fleet in 2016, after test and evaluation demonstrations in 2015, Hoewing says. Various spirals are envisioned, each incorporating more capability and various waveforms. The effort is expected to cost about $20 million for 30 months of development since the restructuring this year. SRP is slated for delivery as a federated system with its own display initially; MV-22s would have it integrated into the multifunction displays already on the aircraft during routine overhauls.

Ultimately, Hoewing says, the Marines envision engaging industry to develop iPhone-like applications for such functions as remote-sensor tasking or radio-frequency identification tagging of soldiers and equipment.


Copyright © 2013, Penton

 
Top