US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
A bipartisan commission is recommending a, "third nuclear shipyard to bolster U.S. strategic forces".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Pentagon needs a third shipyard that can build nuclear-powered ships so the U.S. can keep pace with China and Russia’s nuclear modernization, a congressional commission said in a new report published Thursday.

A third private shipyard would expand industry’s capacity to build nuclear-powered submarines, therefore bolstering U.S. strategic forces, according to the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States.

The commission suggests the Pentagon “increase shipbuilding capacity, by working with industry to establish or renovate a third shipyard dedicated to production of nuclear-powered vessels, with particular emphasis on nuclear-powered submarines,” according to the report.

But lawmakers have voiced concerns over the U.S. industrial base’s capacity to support AUKUS while continuing to build submarines for the U.S. Navy. Newport News and Electric Boat are currently building approximately 1.2 Virginia boats a year, while the overall program is hundreds of months behind schedule, USNI News previously reported. Former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
industry must build more than two boats per year if the U.S. is going to sell attack subs to the Royal Australian Navy.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
B-21 is undergoing taxi testing and apparently is looking to fly by the end of the year.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"I can confirm the B-21 is conducting ground taxi activities. Rigorous testing is a critical step in the B-21 flight test program," an Air Force spokesperson confirmed to The War Zone today. "Extensive testing evaluates systems, components, and functionalities. This testing allows us to mitigate risks, optimize design, and enhance operational effectiveness."

Also, looks like someone managed to grab a picture of it...

 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
This is basically the equivalent of the Virginia submarine program for the US Navy. The Virginia was a cheaper mass produced version of the Seawolf. And the B-21 is a cheaper mass produced version of the B-2. If done correctly it can replace the disparate current US bomber inventory and be quite successful. But it is not that unlikely that they will find some way to muck it up.

Since this is a twin engine it is bound to be much cheaper than the Tu-160s that the Russians are building. It remains to be seen how large the PAK DA will be as well.

So much for my expectations of seeing the H-20 fly first though. At this rate it looks to be increasingly unlikely.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
This is basically the equivalent of the Virginia submarine program for the US Navy. The Virginia was a cheaper mass produced version of the Seawolf. And the B-21 is a cheaper mass produced version of the B-2. If done correctly it can replace the disparate current US bomber inventory and be quite successful. But it is not that unlikely that they will find some way to muck it up.

Since this is a twin engine it is bound to be much cheaper than the Tu-160s that the Russians are building. It remains to be seen how large the PAK DA will be as well.

So much for my expectations of seeing the H-20 fly first though. At this rate it looks to be increasingly unlikely.
Plus 30 years of technological development. Even Virgina class has evolved beyond being the NSSN and in cost actually comes closer to a 1:1 with the majority of differences coming in that the two classes were designed for different missions. With Seawolf having been optimized for deep sea predator missions of hunting boomers well Virgina was designed for more conventional and more Special operations based shallow water.

On the face of it yes, B21 will be the follow up of B2. However military aviation and civilian aviation has evolved significantly. B2 was more or less a Third generation of stealth aviation it lacked radar and much of the advanced datalink and other capabilities that have since become the norm for stealth aircraft like the F35.
RAM materials are advancing beyond even what is in F35 which is still state of the art. Additionally we have now baked in countermeasures likely to be standard. Where again the B2 would be lacking. 30 years of development and changing threat types likely to be factored in.

On comparison Tu160 is a very vintage aircraft with limited RCS reduction and still focused on super sonic performance. Trying to make a comparison becomes difficult as such due to the fact that though the two are to perform a similar role place the means by which they aim to perform such role are dramatically different. It’s like trying to compare a 757 to the Concord.

At this point short of the intervention of Alien Space Bats, B21 will fly before any counterparts emerge from Vapor.
 
Top