In March 29 testimony before the House Armed Services Committee’s tactical aviation panel, Moore said the Block 20s are not “competitive” with the latest Chinese J-20 stealth fighters. And while the aircraft could be used for training, Moore said they are so out of synch with the combat-coded Block 35s that pilots are receiving “negative” training from them, meaning they have to “unlearn” habits developed in the Block 20 before they can become proficient in the Block 35.
“They’re not combat representative,” Moore added during the Mitchell event. “They will never be a part of the combat force. They don’t have the most modern communications. They don’t shoot the most modern weapons. They don’t have the most modern electronic warfare capabilities. They will not become combat representative aircraft, and so we elected to maintain our position from [fiscal year] ‘23 that it’s time to move on from the Block 20.”
While the Air Force is looking to divest the F-22, one weapon slated for a funding surge is the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile funding, after appearing to wind down over several years. Moore was asked if that’s a sign the AIM-260 JATM, , is having problems, or whether the Air Force simply seeks greater stockpiles.
“We don’t see a delay in JATM,” Moore said. “And we want to get to JATM as quickly as we possibly can.” He said the budget also includes “along with some AMRAAM investment, some facilitization money that will help us get to JATM faster. Once we can start procuring it, we’ll get to quantity as fast as we can,” he added.
That is dumb. Other country keep last plane. US is also keeping older F-15 and F-16. Those plane cant be better.
A lot more happens under the hood than people believe. All the folks scoffing at F-35 kinematics fail to understand that it is a lot more capable in many aspects than even early block F-22.
I've bookmarked that article for the next time some cretin says J20 is only "semi-stealth" or some such halfwittery. As USAF have now kindly confirmed, J20 is at a minimum superior to Block 20 F22.
A lot more happens under the hood than people believe. All the folks scoffing at F-35 kinematics fail to understand that it is a lot more capable in many aspects than even early block F-22.
Honestly there shouldn't be much shame to be had calling the J20 superior to the Block 20 F22, when the latter as a whole have already aged considerably. The former is overall a newer plane fitted with newer systems compared that of the latter. The F22 was a paradigm change back in its heyday but there has been a significant amount of time for it to be superseded by the newer fifth gens.I've bookmarked that article for the next time some cretin says J20 is only "semi-stealth" or some such halfwittery. As USAF have now kindly confirmed, J20 is at a minimum superior to Block 20 F22.
Budget constraints.It is OK if you disagree with me. Try expand the criticism besides just one liner insult.
And? F-22 is so worthless that they are better off retired like J-7 in China? Significant claim needs signigicant evidence. One liners are against forum rules.Budget constraints.
Could be. Real evidence would be top secret and put you in jail.And? F-22 is so worthless that they are better off retired like J-7 in China? Significant claim needs signigicant evidence. One liners are against forum rules.
F-22 Block 20 are "worthless". "Worthless" relative to facing modern J-20 and PLAAF's overall systemic warfare. Any other aircraft of any other country, and they would still wipe the floor with them.And? F-22 is so worthless that they are better off retired like J-7 in China? Significant claim needs signigicant evidence. One liners are against forum rules.
Just to keep flying the Block 20 F-22s as they are costs the Air Force about $485 million a year, Moore said, for a price of $3.5 billion through the end of the decade. To upgrade those aircraft to Block 35 standards, though—as some in Congress have urged—would cost an additional $3.5 billion.
On top of price, there is a larger, practical challenge; the effort needed to upgrade the 32 airplanes “would take a decade to get started,” Moore said. “There’s a lot of engineering work that that would take.”
The engineering work is especially troublesome because Lockheed Martin, the prime contractor for the F-22 and F-35, has limited capacity, Moore said.
Its money, engineering resources, opportunity costs. It ain't worth it“Lockheed is not fully staffed for engineers,” Moore said. “So if we were to stand up an effort like this, it would be reasonable to expect they would have to pull some engineering talent off of F-35—probably that means Block 4—in order to get this accomplished. I don’t think that is a [worthwhile] trade to us.”