US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

it's moderately interesting
House panel wants cheaper Patriot missile
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A House panel wants the Army to come up with a plan to get a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
air-and-missile defense system.

The House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee is pushing in its mark-up of the fiscal year 2020 defense authorization bill — released June 3 — for the Army to bring options to Congress for a low-cost interceptor to be used in the Raytheon-made Patriot system. That is because the most updated variant is roughly $5 million a shot, and a cheaper missile would be attractive to foreign customers with Patriot systems.

In recent years, reports have cropped up, for example, of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
threats in the Middle East, fueling the desire to have a less expensive interceptor in the mix.

“With ballistic missile threats increasing globally, combatant commander global force management requirements for the missile defense capacity have consistently been increasing,” the subcommittee states in its bill.

Patriot air defense systems are the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the Army and its allies are expending pricey missiles to take out cheaper targets.

With the Lockheed Martin-made Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement (PAC-3 MSE) interceptor’s high cost, the panel notes, “the incorporation of a low-cost interceptor to supplement existing Patriot interceptor variants could assist in increasing U.S. procurement quantities.”

And foreign customers are in the market for a cheaper missile, the subcommittee adds, could make the development of a new interceptor even less expensive because increased sales would drive down the cost of production.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to supplement its order of Patriot missiles in the second phase of its acquisition plan for the Patriot system. Raytheon has offered SkyCeptor, a variant of the Israeli company Rafael’s Stunner missile.

The committee is directing the Army, should the language in the bill survive to become law, to provide a briefing to the panel by the end of the year “on options to incorporate a low-cost interceptor into the Patriot system.”

It adds, “The report should include cost, schedule, technical, and operational considerations, in addition to an assessment of potential for foreign military sale.”

A few years ago, even though concern over the Army’s shrinking munition stockpile was growing due to operations in the Middle East, the service was
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— the Patriot Guided Enhanced Missile.

That decision still has not been made.

GEM-T missiles cost roughly 50 percent less than an MSE version and are used by a variety of Patriot customers around the world. There are 16 countries that own or have ordered Patriot systems globally.

Raytheon has recently proposed a GEM-T missile containing Gallium Nitride (GaN) in the transmitter portion of the system, which will improve the missile’s performance. Raytheon has developed the GaN version of GEM-T for an undisclosed country and would roll it into GEM-T orders for the Army in the future if given the go-ahead.

It is unclear what the appetite within the service is for a low-cost Patriot interceptor as the Army is focused on developing its future Integrated Air-and-Missile Defense system as one of its top modernization priorities.

The Army, according to its fiscal year 2020 five-year budget plan, wants to develop a new interceptor for IAMD. The system will replace Patriot and consists of a Northrop Grumman-developed command-and-control system. The service is also holding
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
 
Apr 6, 2019
Nov 5, 2018
thought it's over, but Pentagon Appoints Four-Star Officer to Do New Review of 2017 Niger Attack
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now
Pentagon Ends Reviews of Niger Ambush that Killed 4 Soldiers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Pentagon announced it has concluded its reviews of a 2017 ambush that left four U.S. soldiers dead in the African nation of Niger and said it has found the discipline it meted out to be adequate.

Last week, Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick M. Shanahan accepted that conclusion, which was the result of a monthlong review conducted by four-star
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Gen. Robert Brown that did not go beyond the scope of the initial investigation conducted by Special Operations Africa Command. Brown found the administration actions, primarily against junior officers, adequate.

Based on an examination of the review, "I am satisfied that all findings, awards, and accountability actions were thorough and appropriate," Shanahan said in a statement issued Wednesday.

The release of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Wednesday ends more than a year of reviews after the Pentagon wrapped an internal investigation into the 2017 ambush. It detailed a series of "individual, organizational, and institutional failures and deficiencies that contributed to the tragic events" but "no single failure or deficiency" to blame for what happened.

A 12-member Army special forces unit was accompanying 30 Nigerien forces on a mission to capture or kill a high-level Islamic State group leader in West Africa when they were outnumbered and attacked by more than 100 extremists carrying small arms just outside the village of Tongo Tongo.

The investigation into the Oct. 4, 2017, attack resulted in the implementation of 20 recommendations on issues including training, turnover, equipment and improved procedures, according to the Pentagon.

The report said U.S. forces didn't have time to train together before they deployed and didn't do preparatory battle drills with their Nigerien partners.

The mission was hastily planned with lack of attention to details because of time-sensitive intelligence, received hours earlier, that could lead to capture of a high-value target.

The time-sensitive nature of the mission resulted in hasty planning and a lack of attention to details, the unclassified report stated.

Investigators found that
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Command in Africa had no process to deal with time-sensitive or real-time mission approvals and the command seemed implicitly to allow for last-minute notice of operations.

Nine individuals have been disciplined, mainly with letters of reprimand or administrative action. Maj. Gen. Marcus Hicks, who was serving as the commander of special operations forces in Africa at the time of the attack, was the most senior officer punished. That has left some lawmakers and family members of the fallen soldiers asking whether junior officers were unfairly being forced to take the brunt of the blame.

The Pentagon also announced Wednesday that the Army has approved nine awards for valor, including four awarded posthumously to the soldiers killed in the ambush and ensuing firefight.

Killed in the attack were Army Sgt. La David T. Johnson, 25, of Miami Gardens, Florida; Staff Sgt. Bryan C. Black, 35, of Puyallup, Washington; Staff Sgt. Jeremiah W. Johnson, 39, of Springboro, Ohio; and Staff Sgt. Dustin M. Wright, 29, of Lyons, Georgia.

Four Nigerien troops were also killed, and two American soldiers and eight Nigerien forces were wounded.

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations Owen West said the team "served gallantly under fire."

"Ambushed by a numerically superior force, these soldiers upheld the highest standards of small unit infantry combat," West said. "If not for the courageous actions of several soldiers, additional loss of life likely would have occurred."

Wright and La David Johnson were awarded the Silver Star; Black and Jeremiah Johnson were awarded the Bronze Star with V for valor. Jeremiah Johnson was also posthumously promoted to Sgt. 1st Class.

The U.S. military in Africa has taken steps to increase the security of troops on the ground, adding armed drones and armored vehicles and taking a harder look when American forces go out with local troops.

"As a result of this firefight, a team on patrol in Africa would not be in an uncovered position," West said.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Nimitz and Ford Carriers Need Upgrades to Deploy With F-35Cs
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

June 6, 2019 3:37 PM
Currently, the Navy does not have an aircraft carrier — either Ford-class or Nimitz-class — that can support the service’s most advanced fighters for a full deployment, service officials told USNI News on Thursday.

Earlier this week, lawmakers expressed their frustration with the Navy for accepting delivery of Ford-class carriers before they can accommodate deploying with F-35C Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters, while considering the Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act. But the Navy currently doesn’t have a Nimitz-class carrier that can deploy with F-35Cs either.

“The Nimitz-class and Ford-class aircraft carriers, by design, can operate with F-35Cs, however, there are modifications to both carrier classes that are required in order to fully employ the capabilities of the F-35s and enable them to be more effective on a full-length deployment,” Capt. Daniel Hernandez, a Navy spokesman, said in an email to USNI News.

The modifications required to make each aircraft carrier class able to deploy with F-35Cs don’t require a fundamental redesign of either class. Hernandez described the modifications as involving work to support the long-term deployment of F-35Cs, such as adding classified spaces to the carriers and installing more robust jet blast deflectors.

Each class of carrier is currently able to launch and recover F-35C Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters, the variant designed for catapult launching and arrested landing on carriers. Without the carrier modifications, the ships are unable to support an F-35C for more than a short visit.

“These F-35C modifications for CVN-78 and CVN-79 are currently scheduled for a future post-delivery modernization maintenance period that will occur prior to the planned F-35C operations on those carriers,” Hernandez said. “This has always been the plan for CVN-78 and CVN-79 over several budget cycles. CVN-80 and CVN-81 will be constructed with those modifications made during construction and will not require a post-delivery modification.”

Members of the House Armed Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee sought to speed up the Navy’s modification schedule by including language in their FY 2020 NDAA mark
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ford-class carrier, John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) until the carrier can deploy F-35Cs.

There are no technical difficulties involving either the aircraft or the catapults and recover systems aboard the carriers that are preventing the F-35C from deploying.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
aboard a Nimitz-class carrier occurred on Nov. 3, 2014.

The Navy plans to make the needed carrier modifications during the next several years as carriers are available to receive the modifications. The Navy’s first F-35C squadron, VFA-147, is expected to deploy aboard USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) in 2021, USNI News previously reported.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility in Bremerton, Wash., undergoing a $34.3 million dry-docking planned incremental availability, expected to be completed in July 2020, according to the Navy

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
@bd popeye @Air Force Brat @Obi Wan Russell @Jura @Brumby @asif iqbal @siegecrossbow @duncanidaho @Deino

US Navy stands up 1st MQ-4C Triton Squadron, VUP-19 to be deployed to Western Pacific this summer or Fall

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
][/url]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Very Exciting news Jeff Head, hey pray for Jim today, he's having a spinal block...
 
Saturday at 7:37 PM
May 24, 2019
while now noticed
Pentagon seeks funds to reduce U.S. reliance on China's rare earth metals
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
US Commerce Department offers solution for obtaining minerals critical to the military
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A report by the U.S. Commerce Department recommends the government strengthen relations with foreign companies that provide minerals critical to military development.

The report was released Tuesday amid a trade war between the United States and China.

“The United States is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. If China or Russia were to stop exports to the United States and its allies for a prolonged period — similar to China’s rare earths embargo in 2010 — an extended supply disruption could cause significant shocks throughout U.S. and foreign critical mineral supply chains,” the report states.

The report also notes that the U.S. is import-reliant on 31 of the 35 minerals designated as critical by the Department of the Interior. Furthermore, the U.S. completely relies on imports for 14 of these minerals.

The report also says the country’s imports of “critical mineral commodities” exceed 50 percent of its annual consumption. These rare earth minerals are often used in the production of aircraft, computers and GPS systems.

Last year China produced 78 percent of the world’s rare earth minerals, according to researchers at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

“These critical minerals are often overlooked but modern life without them would be impossible,” Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said in a news release. “Through the recommendations detailed in this report, the Federal government will take unprecedented action to ensure that the United States will not be cut off from these vital minerals.”

One solution to this problem is to enhance international trade and cooperation in relation to rare earth minerals, according to the report.

However, the Government Accountability Office in April found that the U.S. is reliant on China for several critical minerals. And China has noted that it could
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from some rare earth minerals should the trade war continue.

The report from the Department of Commerce proposes a continued expansion of rare earth minerals trading with Canada, Australia, the European Union, Japan and South Korea. It notably does not include China.

The report does, however, mention China as an area to which American production companies relocated, and it called for more investment in the National Defense Stockpile program.

The NDS program, which would provide critical materials to support industrial investments to help civilian needs in an emergency, is not financially sustainable, according to the report.

The report also recommends the U.S. expand public-private partnerships to spur investment from industry, and that the country focus on expanding domestic production of critical minerals to break its import reliance.
 
May 30, 2019
Jan 31, 2019
and here's and update:
U.S. 2nd Fleet Declares Operational Capability Ahead of Major European Exercise
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now
U.S. 2nd Fleet Kicks Off BALTOPS 2019
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A massive U.S.-led NATO and European partner exercise is kicking-off near Russia in the Baltic Sea and led by the Norfolk, Va.-based U.S. 2nd Fleet.

This year’s BALTOPS involves ships, aircraft and 8,500 personnel from 18 NATO and European partner nations, U.S. 2nd Fleet commander Vice Adm. Lewis told reporters on Friday. This is the first exercise conducted under the leadership of reestablished 2nd Fleet, which was
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

“No one nation can face today’s challenges alone. Our partner and NATO alliances must continue to strengthen our deterrence and defense efforts and adapt through improving readiness and responsiveness,” Lewis said during a Friday morning teleconference with reporters.

The BALTOPS 2019 exercise will also practice amphibious operations in the Baltic Sea, including a scheduled landing in Klaipeda, Lithuania next week. About 90 miles down the coast, Russia maintains a large Soviet-era naval base in Kaliningrad, a Russian controlled enclave wedged between Poland and Lithuania.

“It’s also a really good opportunity to operate with the U.S. amphibious forces in the NATO amphibious leaders symposium construct and we’re putting to test some command and control arrangements which we really haven’t had the opportunity to execute thus far,” said Rear Adm. Andy Burns, the commander of the United Kingdom Maritime Forces, and acting as Lewis’ deputy for the exercise.

So far, Lewis and Burns said they hadn’t noticed any unsafe or otherwise out of the ordinary behavior from the Baltic Sea Russian fleet.

Earlier on Friday,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a Russian Udaloy-class destroyer came within 100 feet of the U.S. cruiser USS Chancellorsville (CG-82) in the Philippine Sea in an incident, the U.S. Navy called “Unsafe and unprofessional.

“We recognize that Russia is a Baltic Sea state and therefore we would expect some interaction because they will be exercising their freedom to operate on the high seas alongside us, and as Adm. Lewis has pointed out, we’re prepared for that, but we’d expect them to act in a professional manner and follow the law of the seak” Burns said.

Lewis and Burns do recognize there’s a possibility for Russian interference and said BALTOPS plans for such theoretical interactions. For instance, while the U.S. did not send an aircraft carrier to the exercise, and doesn’t plan to in the future, Lewis said Spain contributed an amphibious assault ship carrying Harrier jets and similar in design to the U.S. Navy’s Wasp-class. This ship can provide air cover to the exercise, Lewis said.

“I don’t see that as a provocation, but I do consider it to be a contribution to deterrence,” Lewis said of the Spanish ship. “We are very aware of the difference between deterrence and provocation, and we’re not interested in provoking anyone.”
 
Wednesday at 8:11 AM
Yesterday at 8:42 PM
now NavalToday says it's "likely" they'll send IAMD destroyers;
US Navy replacing Spain-based destroyers with newer ones, adding helicopter squadron
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
What you need to know about the upcoming homeport shifts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Shaking up its forward-deployed flotilla in Spain, eight U.S. Navy warships and a California helicopter squadron have been tabbed for homeport shifts over the next three years.

Initially announced on Tuesday but fleshed out for Navy Times on Friday, the Pentagon plans call for all four guided-missile destroyers stationed in Rota to return home over the next two years, to be swapped out with updated hulls.

And the Naval Air Station North Island-based squadron tentatively has been slated to relocate to Rota to support the quartet of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, officials said.

“The rotation of these ships will be staggered, and we expect them to start around the July 2020 time frame,” said Cmdr. Kyle Raines, spokesman for the U.S. 6th Fleet in Naples.

“The transition is expected to be complete by sometime in the Spring of 2022.”

Raines said that the warship swaps in Rota will be conducted pierside as one-for-one turnovers with the replacements. The process likely will take a week or so to complete with each move.

“At no time will there be less than four ships based in Rota, even as the exchanges take place,” he said.

The Pentagon believes the first warship to switch out will be the Naval Station Mayport-based destroyer
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which is scheduled to replace the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in 2020.

Carney was the last destroyer to make the homeport switch to Spain, arriving in Rota on Sept. 25, 2015.

It’s expected to return to Florida.

Then the Arleigh Burke, the oldest destroyer in the fleet, will replace the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The Donald Cook arrived in Spain on Feb. 11, 2014 and is expected to return to Norfolk.

Commissioned in 1991, Arleigh Burke began a DDG Modernization session in 2010 to extend its service life to four decades.

On March 5, it entered Norfolk’s Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center to begin an Extended Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability, too.

Navy officials consider the last three homeport shifts “pre-decisional,” which means that they could be changed.

“These moves are more than a year away, so we’re not prepared to say they are set in stone,” said Cmdr. Francisco “Mags” Magallon, a spokesman for the Navy at the Pentagon.

They involve the Norfolk-based guided-missile destroyers Oscar Austin and Bulkeley, which are expected to relieve sister destroyers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in 2021 or later.

Under the current Pentagon plan, Ross and Porter will return to Norfolk for overhauls before being slotted back into deployment rotations.

The longest move will be made by the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 79, currently assigned to Naval Air Station North Island.

“The helicopter squadron, we expect, will be the last to arrive sometime in 2022,” Raines said. “Logistically it’s a tougher move than those of the ships and thus is expected to take the longest to execute.”
 
Top