US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

zyklon

Senior Member
Registered Member
AIPAC is going to get around to it, eventually

the worse part is how cheap it is to do this, Aipac only spent $800K in lobby efforts??

JUST $800K???? HOW CHEAP ARE YOU, there are mercenary companies more expensive than this

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
specified in AIPAC's most recent quarterly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
represents direct spend on lobbying in the second quarter of 2026 (Q3 FY26): think payments to registered lobbyists — often, if not usually, former staffers and officials — for literally talking to or otherwise engaging with both elected and appointed American officials, though mostly members of Congress.

This is on top of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and a total of $3,757,105 (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) that AIPAC spent on such efforts in the first quarter of 2026 and the entirety of calendar year 2025, respectively.

AIPAC — or at least what is technically speaking
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— does not actually funnel cash directly to its chosen candidates from its own checkbook.

Instead, political contributions — whether cold hard cash or nominally independent media spend — are disbursed via subordinate and affiliate PACs and Super PACs, and moreover, through AIPAC's massive network of Zionist (mega)donors and their various vehicles.

Think of AIPAC as one of the principal C2 nodes of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that tells its members, affiliated donors and broader network where to direct their dollars and whom to shower with spend — which can total in the billions in a single election cycle — rather than the ultimate uberdonor in itself.
 

AlexYe

Senior Member
Registered Member
The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
specified in AIPAC's most recent quarterly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
represents direct spend on lobbying in the second quarter of 2026 (Q3 FY26): think payments to registered lobbyists — often, if not usually, former staffers and officials — for literally talking to or otherwise engaging with both elected and appointed American officials, though mostly members of Congress.

This is on top of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and a total of $3,757,105 (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) that AIPAC spent on such efforts in the first quarter of 2026 and the entirety of calendar year 2025, respectively.

AIPAC — or at least what is technically speaking
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— does not actually funnel cash directly to its chosen candidates from its own checkbook.

Instead, political contributions — whether cold hard cash or nominally independent media spend — are disbursed via subordinate and affiliate PACs and Super PACs, and moreover, through AIPAC's massive network of Zionist (mega)donors and their various vehicles.

Think of AIPAC as one of the principal C2 nodes of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that tells its members, affiliated donors and broader network where to direct their dollars and whom to shower with spend — which can total in the billions in a single election cycle — rather than the ultimate uberdonor in itself.
Yeah I understand that, still even if collectively its a couple of billions on all things, thats (while high) relatively cheap.
Imagine in a different world if Soviets wanted to mess with US, had done indirect lobbying than spending on other things


Meanwhile Hegseth has ordered Gender affirming care for Military personal over 30.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Screenshot (49018).png
 

SlothmanAllen

Senior Member
Registered Member
The US Department of Defense is planning to construct a new missile instrumentation ship based on the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel and will be produced at Philly Hanwha Shipyard. Not much info around the ship right now, but I think it will be interesting to see what radar systems it will have.

I believe the currently active missile range instrumentation ship is the USNS Howard O. Lorenzen which houses the Cobra King radar system. That ship was comissioned in 2014 and is under US Navy control. I suspect the Navy will also own this new ship, but I don't think that is clear in this announcement.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WASHINGTON —
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
will construct a new missile range instrumentation vessel, dubbed Golden Defender, to support the Pentagon’s Golden Dome missile shield system, the head of the Office of Management and Budget said today.

“We quickly realized that there was an emergent need that the NSMV design naturally lent itself to, and with a hot production line here in Philly, we quickly worked with our partners across government to identify the resources to support additional construction, leveraging Hanwa’s Philly Shipyard and its experienced workforce,” Vought said during a visit to the shipyard to christen the Lone Star State NSVM. “It is thus my honor to announce the awarding of a contract to build the missile range instrumentation vessel Golden Defender right here in Philadelphia under the combined management of Hanwha Philly and TOTE Services as the vessel construction manager.”

USNS Howard O. Lorenzen

1920px-Howard_O._Lorenzen_on_the_Columbia_River_%28140516-Z-PL933-055%29.jpg
 
Top