Rumor has it that it might look a lot like the SAC design.
That means now we know that the SAC's J-XDS will be designated J-58!
Rumor has it that it might look a lot like the SAC design.
That means now we know that the SAC's J-XDS will be designated J-58!
It’s J-47…
On an unrelated note did folks from F-16.net start freaking out over the decision yet?
It wasn't about to be cancelled, but they had paused it for reassessment due to various factors, costs, capabilities, necessity etc etc.Heh, called it. From the first J-36 thread:
View attachment 148281
It was about to be cancelled right?
I bet this legit was the case indeed lmaoIt wasn't about to be cancelled, but they had paused it for reassessment due to various factors, costs, capabilities, necessity etc etc.
Well all they had to do was name it after Trump to get it approved! Not a big deal haha!
The crying over Boeing is overblown imo. NGAD is designed such that govt owns IP and can contract out and compete any components to other companies. I.E. its totally possible for a scenario where Boeing flails in software and another firm like Lockheed could win that contract.Massive salt and tears in TWZ comments section. Really wished that Boeing didn’t get this…