This is not the PLA, but seems to be the first combat use of a robot dog. It searched first two floors of a house before entering the basement and was knocked over and disabled by gunfire. Appears have been customised for bomb disposal.
From a read of the article this was the first time a robot dog from Boston dynamics was shot, and the sentence in question mentions that it operated in a team, not necessarily that this was previously done, nor did it say they were robot dogs.That’s super commonly done by the police, you see it on TV all the time. In fact it also mentions it in like the 4th sentence of the article.
Ah yes, I missed the "dog" part of your postFrom a read of the article this was the first time a robot dog from Boston dynamics was shot, and the sentence in question mentions that it operated in a team, not necessarily that this was previously done, nor did it say they were robot dogs.
Police sent in two other robots often used for bomb disposal into the house to find the suspect along with the robotic dog.
Although you are right, its more accurate to say this is the first recorded loss of a robot dog in combat via enemy gunfire.
Some renders from Kestrel Defense that shows the company's robotic dog mounting a QJS-161 machine gun. Kestrel Defense says the dog can carry 200 rounds of ammo in this configuration.
Why are these drones only ever armed with an inverted QBZ-95 generally speaking? Wouldn't it be far more practical to have them armed with a belt fed machinegun of some sort?
They are sacrificial often for clearing buildings. One mag on a qbz95 is sufficient. In most cases it won't get to fire. Adding weight will also reduce operational time for the batteries.Why are these drones only ever armed with an inverted QBZ-95 generally speaking? Wouldn't it be far more practical to have them armed with a belt fed machinegun of some sort?