iraq was not supplied by NATO but they were and took longer to take over than Ukraine and ukraine is a bigger country,
You are correct Iraq was not supplied in a meaningful way by anyone. The distance from the border to Kiev is significantly shorter than the distance from Kuwait to Baghdad. Roughly 100 km vs 670 km.
Where the Russians have done will is the Southern Front. Again, not denying that. Never have. The distance from Genichesk to Mariupol is about 250 km. +/-
The logistics problems seem to be mostly in the north: AFVs being found with no gas but functional. etc.
unless you're a fan of baghdad bob or you think Russians are supposed to be some super soldiers.
Nope.
Based on the videos I've seen of the soldiers on the ground, with a few exceptions, they seem quite competent. Not super. Not morons. The bunching up on roads is a really bad sign though.
What I do see is an army that cannot move the amount of troops they built up. I see tanks without gas in less than a week into the war. We were seeing that *3* days into the war. That says logistics problems.
No one can say poor performance especially when there still using kids gloves on this conflict. you got to have a list of poor or bad standards before passing judgement of where they are on that scale, atleast your better than the turkish shill that is mad they got stopped by those same people who have also historically kicked their asses multiple times.
Why be insulting? You're doing it again. There's no need to be. Poking at someone doesn't help your argument. Convince, don't insult. You might even win an argument based on reason.
If we want a mocking session, that can be done if the site would let us open a forum for roasts.