Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suetham

Senior Member
Registered Member
Thats irrelevant. The West would love to have a war and draw Russia to an economic quagmire.

The only embassy withdrawal that matters is China's. If you see China withdrawing its embassy staff then you can be 100% assured that a war will happen.
We are not going to see China withdrawing staff from the Chinese embassy in Ukraine because there will simply be no invasion. That's hysteria. But it's good to report and post to be saved.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
We are not going to see China withdrawing staff from the Chinese embassy in Ukraine because there will simply be no invasion. That's hysteria. But it's good to report and post to be saved.
While its important to not overhype a potential invasion, we should also not downplay the possibility of it happening.

After all, surely all these Russian troops (and increasing by the day) near Ukraine are surely not there for just for a picnic.

Anyway, we will soon find out. The Americans say next week. Let's wait
 

Suetham

Senior Member
Registered Member
While its important to not overhype a potential invasion, we should also not downplay the possibility of it happening.

After all, surely all these Russian troops (and increasing by the day) near Ukraine are surely not there for just for a picnic.

Anyway, we will soon find out. The Americans say next week. Let's wait
The invasion will only take place if Ukraine tries to re-annex Donbass. In reality, Russian troops are there for two purposes: to prevent the retaking of Donbass and to put pressure on NATO's foreign policy in Eastern Europe. The red line is Ukraine.

If by any chance the Ukrainian Army really does advance into Donbass, the Russians will stop them like they stopped them in 2015.

The narrative of the US and the West is precisely trying to cover the facade of a Ukrainian advance in Donbass, knowing that such an advance will result in civilian casualties in the pro-Russian population in Donbass, in this way, they try to discredit the Russians when the Russian media reports. this to the world that such civilians are being massacred and that the Russian Army has "invaded" Donbass, when in reality it has only advanced to protect the pro-Russian population in Donbass.

The script is the same as in Georgia, if Russia did not intervene, the Ossetians would be massacred by the Georgian army.

Now an interesting observation is the Russian mobilization through the rail network. It has no parallel in the world.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
The narrative of the US and the West is precisely trying to cover the facade of a Ukrainian advance in Donbass, knowing that such an advance will result in civilian casualties in the pro-Russian population in Donbass, in this way, they try to discredit the Russians when the Russian media reports. this to the world that such civilians are being massacred and that the Russian Army has "invaded" Donbass, when in reality it has only advanced to protect the pro-Russian population in Donbass.

The script is the same as in Georgia, if Russia did not intervene, the Ossetians would be massacred by the Georgian army.
I think that's the point. Even if (which it doesn't) Russia doesn't want a war, the West wants a war.

They would happily trade Ukraine for economically crippling Russia. That would be a net benefit to them
 

semiconprof

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Excellent material to read and understand, especially the mention of George Kennan, the father of the containment doctrine who really warned NATO not to expand eastwards, arguing that in the future the organization would have a resurgent Russia, a fact that is really proven.
The importance of buffer zone is completely lost to the west thanks to their hubris and boneheaded virtual signaling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top